Quote:
Originally Posted by Paleoeat
Apparently my buddy Tarlach has plenty of evidence that tubers were not eaten. But he's not sharing this info...yet.
|
As you just quoted - you can't prove a negative. I have not ever found any evidence to show that paleo man ate tubers.
Why not go and do your own research and make your own decisions?
I have spend last three years studying the paleo diet and I'm quite happy with all of my conclusions. I don't have to make anyone else believe what I do.
You are quite happy to exclude tubers like potatoes, yams and sweet potato because Cordain says so, why would you even consider other tubers ok? They are all classified the same way for a reason.
The fact that potatoes are not edible raw is probably a good sign that paleo man did not evolve eating tubers, or we would not react so badly to them.
Jicama has 93% of it's calories as carbs. I can't see any reason why anyone would want to eat it, unless it was just because 'it tastes good'.
At lease mineralman can admit this is the reason. He's not keeping his carb addiction a secret.
Paleo man may not have exploited every resource as you put. He seemed to spend a lot more time and effort hunting than doing anything else (almost everyone can agree on this), indicating that meat and or fat was the number one priority.
It was only recently that man decided grains and tubers were foods worth farming and there is plenty of evidence to show that this is when mans health dropped significantly.
Paleo man was probably carnivorous by choice and maybe omnivorous by necessity...