Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Tue, Oct-02-12, 02:44
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 26,731
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/153/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 109%
Location: UK
Default Obese Brain May Thwart Weight Loss

Quote:
From Science Daily
October 1, 2012

Obese Brain May Thwart Weight Loss: Diets High in Saturated Fat, Refined Sugar May Cause Brain Changes That Fuel Overconsumption

"Betcha can't eat just one!" For obese people trying to lose weight, advertising slogans such as this one hit a bit too close to home as it describes the daily battle to resist high calorie foods.

But new research by Terry Davidson, director of American University's Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, indicates that diets that lead to obesity -- diets high in saturated fat and refined sugar -- may cause changes to the brains of obese people that in turn may fuel overconsumption of those same foods and make weight loss more challenging.

"It is a vicious cycle that may explain why obesity is so difficult to overcome," said Davidson, also a professor of psychology at AU.

Davidson recently published his research, "The Effects of a High-Energy Diet on Hippocampal-Dependent Discrimination Performance and Blood-Brain Barrier Integrity Differ for Diet-Induced Obese and Diet-Resistant Rats," in the journal Physiology & Behavior.

Fat Rats Suffer Memory Impairment, Damage to Brain's Armor

Davidson, formerly with Purdue University, focuses his research on the hippocampus -- the part of the brain responsible for memory and learning.

For this study, Davidson and his team trained rats given restricted access to low-fat "lab chow" on two problems -- one that tested the rats' hippocampal-dependent learning and memory abilities and one that did not. Once the training phase completed, the rats were split into two groups: one group had unlimited access to the low-fat lab chow, while the other had unlimited access to high-energy (high-fat/calorie) food.

The high-energy food was high in saturated fat (animal fats, such as those found in cheese or meat or certain plant-based fats, such as cottonseed oil and coconut oil) -- considered to be the most unhealthful dietary fat as research has linked it to cardiovascular disease and certain types of cancer.

When both groups of rats were presented the problems again, the rats that became obese from the high-energy diet performed much more poorly than the non-obese rats did on the problem designed to test hippocampal-dependent learning and memory. They tested the same as the non-obese rats on the other problem.

When the researchers later examined all of the rats' blood-brain barriers (if the brain were an exclusive nightclub, the blood-brain barrier -- a tight network of blood vessels protecting the brain -- would be the bouncer at the door carefully policing who gets in), they found that the obese rats' blood-brain barriers had become impaired as they allowed a much larger amount of a dye that does not freely cross the blood-brain barrier into the hippocampus than did blood-brain barriers of the non-obese rats (the dye was administered to all of the rats).

Interestingly, the non-obese rats group included rats from both the low-fat lab chow group and the high-energy diet group. But this isn't a matter of some rats having a super-high metabolism that allowed them eat to large amounts of the high-energy food and remain a reasonable weight.

"The rats without blood-brain barrier and memory impairment also ate less of the high-energy diet than did our impaired rats," Davidson said. "Some rats and some people have a lower preference for high-energy diets. Our results suggest that whatever allows them to eat less and keep the pounds off also helps to keep their brains cognitively healthy."

A Vicious Cycle

The hippocampus is also responsible for suppressing memories. If Davidson's findings apply to people, it could be that a diet high in saturated fat and refined sugar impacts the hippocampus's ability to suppress unwanted thoughts -- such as those about high-calorie foods, making it more likely that an obese person will consume those foods and not be able to stop at what would be considered a reasonable serving.

"What I think is happening is a vicious cycle of obesity and cognitive decline," Davidson said. "The idea is, you eat the high fat/high calorie diet and it causes you to overeat because this inhibitory system is progressively getting fouled up. And unfortunately, this inhibitory system is also for remembering things and suppressing other kinds of thought interference."

Davidson's findings are compatible with other studies finding a link between human obesity in middle age and an increased likelihood of developing Alzheimer's disease and other cognitive dementias later in life.

"We are trying to figure out that link," Davidson said. "We have compelling evidence that overconsumption of a high fat diet damages or alters the blood-brain barrier. Now we are interested in the fact that substances that are not supposed to get to the brain are getting to it because of this breakdown. You start throwing things into the brain that don't belong there, and it makes sense that brain function would be affected."

A Lifelong Battle

As evidenced by contestants of NBC's reality show "The Biggest Loser," formerly obese celebrities who undergo gastric by-pass surgery, and other numerous examples of extreme weight loss, it is possible for obese people to win the battle of the bulge. Unfortunately, the attempt to keep it off is, more often than not, a lifelong battle that requires permanent lifestyle changes. Davidson says this could be due in part to permanent changes in the brain.

"I do think it [the damage] becomes permanent, but I don't know at what point it becomes permanent," Davidson said. "Other research has found that obese people and formerly obese people have weaker hippocampal activity when consuming food than do people who have never been obese. Just because you lose the weight doesn't mean you regain the brain function. This could help explain why it is so difficult for formerly obese people to keep the weight off."

Journal Reference:
Terry L. Davidson, Andrew Monnot, Adelai U. Neal, Ashley A. Martin, J. Josiah Horton, Wei Zheng. The effects of a high-energy diet on hippocampal-dependent discrimination performance and blood–brain barrier integrity differ for diet-induced obese and diet-resistant rats. Physiology & Behavior, 2012; 107 (1): 26 DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.05.015
http://www.sciencedaily.com/release...21001171115.htm


Quote:
The effects of a high-energy diet on hippocampal-dependent discrimination performance and blood–brain barrier integrity differ for diet-induced obese and diet-resistant rats

Abstract

Rats that consume high-energy (HE) diets (i.e., diets high in saturated fats and sugar) show impaired hippocampal-dependent learning and memory (e.g., Kanoski and Davidson (2011) [1]). To further investigate this effect, we trained rats given restricted access to low-fat lab chow on hippocampal-dependent serial feature-negative (FN) and hippocampal-independent simple discrimination problems. When training was completed, Group Chow received ad libitum lab chow. The remaining rats received ad libitum HE diet. Performance on both discrimination problems was tested following 7, 14, 21 and 28 days of HE diet exposure. FN, but not simple discrimination, was abolished initially for all rats, and then re-emerged for Group Chow. For rats fed HE diet, those that weighed the least and had the lowest amount of body fat (HE-diet resistant (HE-DR) rats), performed like Group Chow on both discrimination problems. However, HE diet-induced obese (HE-DIO) rats (i.e., rats that weighed the most weight and had the most body fat) performed like Group Chow on the simple discrimination problem, but were impaired throughout testing on the FN problem. Subsequent assessment of blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability revealed that concentrations of an exogenously administered dye were elevated in the hippocampus, but not in the striatum or prefrontal cortex for HE-DIO rats relative to the HE-DR and Chow groups. The results indicate that the adverse consequences of HE diet on hippocampal-dependent cognitive functioning are associated with detrimental effects on the BBB and that both of these outcomes vary with sensitivity to HE diet-induced increases in weight and adiposity.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...031938412002028
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Tue, Oct-02-12, 07:53
bkloots's Avatar
bkloots bkloots is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 10,150
 
Plan: LC--Atkins
Stats: 195/162/150 Female 62in
BF:
Progress: 73%
Location: Kansas City, MO
Default

Quote:
Our results suggest that whatever allows them to eat less and keep the pounds off also helps to keep their brains cognitively healthy."
This is a huge "whatever."

Unfortunately, my N=1 experiment going back to 1964 has an enormous flaw. When I'm gaining weight, I'm not tracking anything. I only track stuff (calories, carbs, whatever) when I'm trying to lose weight.

So, fifty years or so into my weight management saga, I actually do not know what my maintenance parameters are. How many calories? How many carbs? How much exercise? I've done it all, without a definite picture.

So far, Atkins/low-carb is the best I've come up with as a way to sustain reasonable maintenance without unacceptable deprivation. But I have no idea whether my hippocampus is cooperating or not when I sit down to my ribeye and salad.
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Tue, Oct-02-12, 08:10
Nancy LC's Avatar
Nancy LC Nancy LC is offline
Experimenter
Posts: 25,863
 
Plan: DDF
Stats: 202/185.4/179 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 72%
Location: San Diego, CA
Default

Quote:
If Davidson's findings apply to people, it could be that a diet high in saturated fat and refined sugar impacts the hippocampus's ability to suppress unwanted thoughts -- such as those about high-calorie foods, making it more likely that an obese person will consume those foods and not be able to stop at what would be considered a reasonable serving.

They really need to separate out the two variables: fat and sugar and not pretend they're the same thing.
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Tue, Oct-02-12, 10:38
WereBear's Avatar
WereBear WereBear is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 14,675
 
Plan: EpiPaleo/Primal/LowOx
Stats: 220/130/150 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 129%
Location: USA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nancy LC
They really need to separate out the two variables: fat and sugar and not pretend they're the same thing.


True. I see their continued focus on fat stemming from their misconceptions about calories.
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Tue, Oct-02-12, 11:32
gonwtwindo's Avatar
gonwtwindo gonwtwindo is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 6,671
 
Plan: General Low Carb
Stats: 164/162.6/151 Female 5'3"
BF:Sure is
Progress: 11%
Location: SoCal
Default

I'm having a hard time with the fat & sugar always being viewed as one. I wish they'd redo their research to 3 groups, i.e., one low-fat, one high-fat, one high-sugar.

For that matter, high-protein, too. And low-all-of-the-above. Heh.
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Tue, Oct-02-12, 12:04
teaser's Avatar
teaser teaser is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 15,075
 
Plan: mostly milkfat
Stats: 190/152.4/154 Male 67inches
BF:
Progress: 104%
Location: Ontario
Default

Quote:
one that tested the rats' hippocampal-dependent learning and memory abilities and one that did not.


How do you get a rat to even solve a problem? Give it an opportunity for food, mating. Convince it that it's in some kind of danger, or make the problem solving necessary for the rat to have a little fun on the running wheel. Lots of ways. Can anybody think of any way to get a rat to solve a problem that doesn't have hormonal consequences? This might as easily measure motivation--and motivation particular to whatever reward was offered for the hoped for behaviour, as actual ability to think.
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Tue, Oct-02-12, 12:35
Nancy LC's Avatar
Nancy LC Nancy LC is offline
Experimenter
Posts: 25,863
 
Plan: DDF
Stats: 202/185.4/179 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 72%
Location: San Diego, CA
Default

Quote:
How do you get a rat to even solve a problem?

They do things like have a hidden platform in water. They have to swim around and find the platform. If their little memories work well, they remember where the platform is the next time. If they don't, they swim around longer until they bump into it.

Maze running, etc.

Maybe that wasn't the question you were asking. But it seems like as long as the exercise is the same between all the groups of rats it shouldn't make any difference.
Reply With Quote
  #8   ^
Old Tue, Oct-02-12, 16:44
aj_cohn's Avatar
aj_cohn aj_cohn is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 3,948
 
Plan: Protein Power
Stats: 213/167/165 Male 65 in.
BF:35%/23%/20%
Progress: 96%
Location: United States
Default

Also, I'd wager that the high-fat rat chow was also high in PUFAs. When will Purina make a high-fat chow with fats that are actually healthy for you? Hell, I'd buy some, just for the convenience.
Reply With Quote
  #9   ^
Old Tue, Oct-02-12, 17:36
teaser's Avatar
teaser teaser is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 15,075
 
Plan: mostly milkfat
Stats: 190/152.4/154 Male 67inches
BF:
Progress: 104%
Location: Ontario
Default

That's the sort of thing I was talking about, Nancy, thanks. But still--is the rat having trouble finding the platform because of problems with memory, or is it just all stressed out from being tossed in the water--or is it even just depressed? That's one way they check for depression in rodents, toss 'em in water and see how long they bother to swim. All we can measure here is the behaviour.
Reply With Quote
  #10   ^
Old Fri, Oct-05-12, 00:09
RubySpider's Avatar
RubySpider RubySpider is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 494
 
Plan: My Own
Stats: 293/293/180 Female 165 cm
BF:
Progress: 0%
Location: Washington, USA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by teaser
That's one way they check for depression in rodents, toss 'em in water and see how long they bother to swim. All we can measure here is the behaviour.


Observation: Rat is on the bottom of the tank.
Conclusion: Rat was depressed.
Bonus conclusion: The rat has been cleared of charges of witchcraft.

Sorry, it is October after all!
Reply With Quote
  #11   ^
Old Fri, Oct-05-12, 05:16
WereBear's Avatar
WereBear WereBear is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 14,675
 
Plan: EpiPaleo/Primal/LowOx
Stats: 220/130/150 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 129%
Location: USA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aj_cohn
Also, I'd wager that the high-fat rat chow was also high in PUFAs. When will Purina make a high-fat chow with fats that are actually healthy for you? Hell, I'd buy some, just for the convenience.


AJ Chow! Now with Omega 3s!
Reply With Quote
  #12   ^
Old Fri, Oct-05-12, 09:48
Nancy LC's Avatar
Nancy LC Nancy LC is offline
Experimenter
Posts: 25,863
 
Plan: DDF
Stats: 202/185.4/179 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 72%
Location: San Diego, CA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RubySpider
Observation: Rat is on the bottom of the tank.
Conclusion: Rat was depressed.
Bonus conclusion: The rat has been cleared of charges of witchcraft.

Sorry, it is October after all!

LOL!

Bonus bonus conclusion: The rat weighs more than a duck, since ducks float.
Reply With Quote
  #13   ^
Old Fri, Oct-05-12, 09:51
kitann kitann is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 219
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 210/154/130 Female 63 inches
BF:
Progress: 70%
Location: East Central Kansas
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nancy LC
They really need to separate out the two variables: fat and sugar and not pretend they're the same thing.

I wish they could sort it out too. I'm not prepared to comment on their methods, but in The End of Overeating: Taking Control of the Insatiable American Appetite David Kessler makes a case for how certain combinations of sugar (carbs) fat and salt make foods 'hyperpalatable' and short circuits the brains ability to signal satiety. I read it some years ago and don't remember a lot of details but it is a worthy read. The Amazon description gives a nice synopsis of his thesis.
"Dr. David Kessler, the dynamic former FDA commissioner who reinvented the food label and tackled the tobacco industry, now reveals how the food industry has hijacked the brains of millions of Americans. The result? America s number-one public health issue. Dr. Kessler cracks the code of overeating by explaining how our bodies and minds are changed when we consume foods that contain sugar, fat, and salt."

Anyway, that is another view of why/how they may keep lumping fats and sugars together. It seems people who eat high fat and high carb have more trouble maintaining healthy weight, as I can attest!
Reply With Quote
  #14   ^
Old Fri, Oct-05-12, 10:21
Nancy LC's Avatar
Nancy LC Nancy LC is offline
Experimenter
Posts: 25,863
 
Plan: DDF
Stats: 202/185.4/179 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 72%
Location: San Diego, CA
Default

I read it too, it was very good.
Reply With Quote
  #15   ^
Old Fri, Oct-05-12, 10:34
Zuleikaa Zuleikaa is offline
Finding the Pieces
Posts: 17,049
 
Plan: Mishmash
Stats: 365/308.0/185 Female 66
BF:
Progress: 32%
Location: Maryland, US
Default

I especially liked the part where they compared the brain scans of people who ate fat, sugar, salt to those on drugs.

They both lit up the same areas of the brain and after a while they discovered that the brain had actually been "rewired" by each "drug".
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 21:04.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.