Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Tue, May-15-12, 10:02
PilotGal PilotGal is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 36,355
 
Plan: KetoCarnivore
Stats: 206.6/178/160 Female 5'7
BF:awesome
Progress: 61%
Location: USA
Default Gastric bypass death brings focus on risks

article


The wedding photo hangs next to an urn containing Hilary Lane’s ashes.

Quote:
Holding a bouquet of roses, she smiles confidently into the camera. A year after gastric bypass surgery, she was no longer a size 24 and was fast on her way to fitting into a slim 6.

But she never stopped losing weight.

The surgery she had in 2005 triggered a genetic mutation to take over her metabolism and prevent her body from processing proteins. The music teacher at Whitsitt Elementary School had wasted away to only 88 pounds by the time she died in April. She was 43.

While a gastric bypass can help severely obese people maintain a healthier weight and in some cases even cure diabetes, the surgery has its own set of risks. The death rate from the actual surgery is less than 1 percent, but complications can occur later, ranging from calcium malabsorption to the rare genetic disorder that killed Lane.

“I want people to understand the risks involved,” said her husband, Randy Lane, who had hoped to be celebrating his sixth wedding anniversary this month.

The surgery, which is performed on about 220,000 Americans a year, does more than restrict what someone can eat — it also changes how the digestive tract absorbs food. Patients have to maintain special diets, take supplements and be closely monitored.

Yet doctors really don’t have any other effective options for treating morbid obesity, generally defined as being 100 or more pounds overweight. Lifestyle changes, such as diet and exercise, are rarely successful for these patients without surgical intervention. Prescription drugs have been yanked off the market because of adverse — sometimes deadly — side effects. No new diet drug has received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval in more than a decade, although the agency’s recommending committee has endorsed two medicines, Qnexa and lorcaserin, that could become available later this year.

For Hilary Lane, gastric bypass surgery seemed to be the only option. No one knew then to warn her about a rare and difficult-to-detect genetic disorder called acquired urea cycle failure.

Her problems began about four years after the gastric bypass surgery. Doctors at Vanderbilt University Medical Center were perplexed. No nutritional equation worked because her body was turning protein into ammonia and her liver was failing to convert it to urea. Her body could not excrete the toxin.

Cynthia Le Mons, the executive director of the National Urea Cycle Disorders Foundation, believes the complication that led to Hilary Lane’s death is not as rare as doctors think. She knows of six women who have developed urea cycle failure after gastric bypass surgery since 2007. Five of the six died.

“That’s just the tip of the iceberg,” Le Mons said. “If we know about it, it’s just a microcosm of what is going on.”

The surgery requirements
Although almost a third of Tennessee’s adult population is obese, the number of state residents classified as morbidly obese who would qualify for gastric bypass surgery falls to between 5 percent and 8 percent, said Dr. Ronald H. Clements, Vanderbilt’s director of bariatric surgery.

Hilary Lane qualified. She weighed more than 300 pounds.

Although she was no couch potato, she had been heavy since elementary school, said her sister, Catherine Parks McAfee.

“She was the most active overweight person you have ever seen,” McAfee said. “She was never sedentary. She was diving coach of the Sequoia Swim Club for 25 years and a music teacher at a Metro elementary school, always going, doing choirs and private lessons for piano and all kinds of things.”

Hilary Lane met her husband on Match.com, and their first face-to-face encounter was at a Bellevue restaurant on a winter evening.

“She had a magic smile,” he said. “Her eyes were incredible.”

She had not had the surgery yet, but her weight didn’t keep him from asking her out again.

“I’m not really a vain person,” Randy Lane said. “Outward appearances don’t really affect me. I go more for personality, intellect. You have to be fun.”

The following summer, she told him about her plans to have the surgery. It took place the year before their wedding at Smiley Hollow, a family farm in Ridgetop that hosts special events.

“It was probably the best day of her life,” McAfee said. “I’d say she felt like a princess. She was where she had always wanted to be.”

The first years of the marriage were wonderful. Hilary Lane enjoyed planning weekend camping trips and being close to nature. The couple loved spending mornings on a bend of the Harpeth River near their Kingston Springs home.

“We would sit there in our chairs, drink coffee, read the paper and watch the river float by,” Randy Lane said.

The health complications
The first indication of a problem was the continued weight loss. Later, the ammonia spikes interfered with her thought processes and caused personality changes.

“At first they tested to see if maybe she was throwing up,” McAfee said. “They didn’t know. She had no signs of that. Every time she was in the hospital, there would be more and more questions — almost like we were the first case ever.”

Hilary Lane ended up in the intensive care unit at the Vanderbilt hospital a year and a half ago, but she recovered. Then she got sick again.

“Last fall, she just started deteriorating,” Randy Lane said. “It was a cruel, cruel disease. You can’t do anything about it. You just watched her get weaker and weaker. When her ammonia level would go up, things didn’t make sense to her. She hurt all the time from last September until she passed. She was in constant pain.”

The genetic disorder, which typically affects children, involves a deficiency of an enzyme that removes ammonia from the bloodstream. Eating protein causes ammonia spikes, but when people with the disorder don’t eat protein, their bodies begin breaking down lean muscle mass.

“We were in this dilemma,” he said. “She would take nutrients but her ammonia level would go up, and to get her ammonia level down, of course, she couldn’t take any nutrients. That’s the cycle she got into.”

The family did not learn until shortly before her death that she had acquired urea cycle failure.

The genetic disorder
There are few documented cases in medical literature about gastric bypass surgery triggering the genetic mutation into action, according to both Dr. Clements at Vanderbilt and Le Mons, who heads the foundation for the disorder.

Testing for the mutation before the surgery is a challenge because more than 300 mutations have been linked to the disorder, Le Mons said.

“Those are just the known ones,” she said. “We have kids and adults coming out of the woodwork with new mutations all the time.”

Every medical decision involves a risk-benefit analysis, Clements said, and patients are warned about complications from gastric bypass surgery. However, it has proven to work better than anything else to help morbidly obese people maintain a healthy weight, he said.

Even those who are able to lose 100 pounds without surgery often gain it back.

“I’ve had some patients lose 500 pounds over their lifetime, gaining and losing, gaining and losing that same 100 pounds or so,” he said. “Bariatic surgery is absolutely not the perfect fix-all, be-all, everything is going to be lovely afterward. That’s not true either. There are risks associated with the operation — absolutely no question about that.”

Clements said anyone who has the surgery requires long-term follow-up. Bone density is something doctors watch.

“When you do a gastric bypass, you decrease the absorption of fat,” he said. “Vitamin D has to be dissolved in fat before your body can absorb it. So when you cut down on fat absorption to be able to lose weight, you also cut down on the ability to absorb vitamin D. The area of the intestine that we bypass in the gastric bypass is also largely responsible for calcium absorption.”

But the benefits of the surgery far outweigh the risks, Clements said.

Randy Lane wants people to realize that those risks are real.

“I’m not mad at the surgeon that did it,” he said. “I’m not mad at Vanderbilt. I’m not mad at anybody. This is just something that happened. But there’s got to be a Ph.D. out there that can figure this out.”
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Tue, May-15-12, 12:04
WereBear's Avatar
WereBear WereBear is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 14,682
 
Plan: EpiPaleo/Primal/LowOx
Stats: 220/130/150 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 129%
Location: USA
Default

That is so incredibly sad.

When I think of all the folks here who managed to lose even more weight than that; with improvements to their health, not risking death at all!

I understand that 60-80% of WLS patients do keep their diabetes in remission; but if they stretch the pouch and go back to their old eating habits, the diabetes returns. Duh! Once again, there's so many people just on this board who have gotten better results with far less risk.

As I say over and over, I can lock people in Low Carb Jail for six months and get great results. Where's my grant?
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Tue, May-15-12, 12:20
MizKitty's Avatar
MizKitty MizKitty is offline
95% Sugar Free!
Posts: 7,010
 
Plan: Very high fat LC/HCG
Stats: 310/155.4/159 Female 67 inches
BF:
Progress: 102%
Location: Missouri
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WereBear
As I say over and over, I can lock people in Low Carb Jail for six months and get great results. Where's my grant?


If you need someone to lobby for you, give me a ring!
Can Oprah be your first prisoner? LOL.

Quote:
The death rate from the actual surgery is less than 1 percent


Meaning, they didn't die on the operating table. It's shocking how many die shortly thereafter (weeks, months, years) from complications, and the cause of death is recorded as the complication, and never counted as death caused by the surgery.
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Tue, May-15-12, 12:44
WereBear's Avatar
WereBear WereBear is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 14,682
 
Plan: EpiPaleo/Primal/LowOx
Stats: 220/130/150 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 129%
Location: USA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MizKitty
If you need someone to lobby for you, give me a ring!
Can Oprah be your first prisoner? LOL.


LOL back, but gosh, imagine if Oprah had really tried low carb and stuck with it? We'd have our revolution!


Quote:
Originally Posted by MizKitty
Meaning, they didn't die on the operating table. It's shocking how many die shortly thereafter (weeks, months, years) from complications, and the cause of death is recorded as the complication, and never counted as death caused by the surgery.


Yes, they manipulate the statistics for cancer the same way. People are not informed of the risks of treatment; which get buried in some other category when the patient expires... of something that isn't cancer, but is cancer-treatment-related.

I don't see it with statin prescriptions, either; nary a whisper of side effects, though now it's been reported that at least 30% get them, and many are permanent disabilities, especially with elderly patients.

I'm certainly not saying we shouldn't treat these illnesses to the best of our ability; we just shouldn't do them without informed consent. Experiments work that way; when are they going to admit they've been experimenting all along?

Last edited by WereBear : Wed, May-16-12 at 04:10.
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Tue, May-15-12, 18:38
Merpig's Avatar
Merpig Merpig is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 7,582
 
Plan: EF/Fung IDM/keto
Stats: 375/225.4/175 Female 66.5 inches
BF:
Progress: 75%
Location: NE Florida
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MizKitty
Meaning, they didn't die on the operating table. It's shocking how many die shortly thereafter (weeks, months, years) from complications, and the cause of death is recorded as the complication, and never counted as death caused by the surgery.
Yes, this poor woman would be considered a surgical "success" because she survived longer than the one-month follow-up period or so that is usual. So she would not show up in any WLS mortality statistics.
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Wed, May-16-12, 15:59
Dodger's Avatar
Dodger Dodger is offline
Posts: 8,765
 
Plan: Paleoish/Keto
Stats: 225/167/175 Male 71.5 inches
BF:18%
Progress: 116%
Location: Longmont, Colorado
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merpig
Yes, this poor woman would be considered a surgical "success" because she survived longer than the one-month follow-up period or so that is usual. So she would not show up in any WLS mortality statistics.
I figured as much. Drug trials seem to run the same way. No concern for the long-term effects.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:57.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.