Sat, Oct-16-10, 04:48
|
|
Every moment is NOW.
Posts: 23,064
|
|
Plan: LC (ketogenic)
Stats: 520/381/280
BF: Why yes it is.
Progress: 58%
Location: Ozarks USA
|
|
Seems to me when the hunter/gathering sorts traveled, it wasn't all that far, was gradually, was only alongside their prey. It wasn't about being social and joining a city, it was about eating.
When agrarian sorts traveled, it seems like it was to find new places to settle, new social enclaves, forming cities, etc. And they could take their food with them, in the sense that they could plant anywhere with workable soil.
You don't hear much about H/G spreading disease but you certainly everywhere see that agrarians spread disease as they traveled to new places (eg smallpox to natives in America) or just flat out developed disease due greatly to crowded conditions (black plague surely wouldn't have been the issue it was if the people were in density/distance of farmers or small tribes rather than old crowded cities. On the bright side, you can certainly say that the plague "reduced the crowding").
(I was once in college when the BP came up and I said, "Do you have ANY idea how many people Europe would have right now if that hadn't happened?!" My professor told me I was a ghoul. ;-) )
So it doesn't seem surprising that H/G were not the larger numbers and usually die off when running into the others. If you can eat grass, no matter how poorly it serves your health, you're likely to do better than if you actually depend on roving meat with legs, which can be decimated by many factors in particular by other men... and I think it's possible low-level chronic exposure to poisons (which grains and dairy might actually be, albeit I sure do love dairy, and I loved grains until I realized my gluten issue...) might actually serve as a sort of vaccination or gradual tolerance effect, compared to people with almost no exposure to those things, suddenly running into them.
PJ
|