Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtle2003
Since the graphic showed the obese rat being slimmed down several times and allowed to become obese again, I'm guessing the treatment works after the subject gets fat.
|
My understanding was that the rats were treated with a drug, not with food. I was wondering about the use of food as treatment or preventive.
Quote:
Also, I don't think he said that anti-angiogenic treatment would not work after a cancer is established - he showed several cures for animals with advanced cancers - but he pointed out that it didn't always work and that preferentially the treatment should be applied before a cancer can even grow beyond the microscopic, harmless phase.
|
Again I was talking about food. My recollection was that all of the dramatic animal stories involved treatment with anti-cancer drugs. Then he transitioned to the idea of
preventing cancer with an anti-angiogenic diet, so that those tiny cancers that many of us are walking around with all unawares don't grow into a disease state.
He certainly isn't suggesting that we treat full-blown cancer with food alone or that we give anti-cancer drugs to people without diagnosed cancer. He's proposing that we might prevent, not treat, with food.
By analogy, I'm obese already. I have the equivalent of full-blown the cancer, not the tiny potential cancer. Even if the drug could reduce my weight, that doesn't mean that eating the anti-angiogenic foods would be sufficient to do so.
It seems that if we apply the analogy of cancer prevention, the food may or may not be useful in preventing obesity, but I'm sceptical that I'll grow thinner if I start eating lots of tomato sauce and strawberries. I've already reached the "disease" state; too late for prevention.