Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Kitchen: Low-Carb Recipes > Kitchen Talk
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Mark Forums Read Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46   ^
Old Wed, Mar-04-09, 10:07
awriter's Avatar
awriter awriter is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 1,096
 
Plan: Kwasniewski Ratios
Stats: 225/158/145 Female 65
BF:53%/24%/20%
Progress: 84%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by capmikee
As I mentioned earlier, I can't do tomato.

I did remember that, but as I said in my OP on the topic, the tomato paste amount is very small, and it caramelizes away when you roast the bones. Only the taste (and a lot of it!) remains, just like when you cook with wine and the alcohol burns off.

Quote:
I was still using NT as a reference, just put in less carrots than they recommended. I'll try it another way next time. But are you saying I shouldn't even add anything acidic?

I am. Think about the chemical reaction when you 'cook' fish in a citric acid, as with cerviche. You don't want that process going on in the beef stock, just as you don't want to add any 'sweet' from things like carrots and parsnips. OTHO, it's why you do want to increase the umami quotient of beef by adding the dried mushrooms.

Lisa
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #47   ^
Old Wed, Mar-04-09, 10:25
capmikee's Avatar
capmikee capmikee is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 5,160
 
Plan: Weston A. Price, GFCF
Stats: 165/133/132 Male 5' 5"
BF:?/12.7%/?
Progress: 97%
Location: Philadelphia
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by awriter
I did remember that, but as I said in my OP on the topic, the tomato paste amount is very small, and it caramelizes away when you roast the bones. Only the taste (and a lot of it!) remains, just like when you cook with wine and the alcohol burns off.

I'm not taking my chances.

Quote:
I am. Think about the chemical reaction when you 'cook' fish in a citric acid, as with cerviche. You don't want that process going on in the beef stock,

Why not? I want to get the minerals from the bones.
Reply With Quote
  #48   ^
Old Wed, Mar-04-09, 12:50
awriter's Avatar
awriter awriter is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 1,096
 
Plan: Kwasniewski Ratios
Stats: 225/158/145 Female 65
BF:53%/24%/20%
Progress: 84%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by capmikee
I want to get the minerals from the bones.

Exactly! You want the minerals from the bones to go into the stock - not be destroyed by the enzymes. Thus, no acids. By all means feel free to add them to the broth or soup from the stock however, because will have not only already removed the bones, you're only cooking the broth/soup for a brief time.

Lisa
Reply With Quote
  #49   ^
Old Wed, Mar-04-09, 12:59
capmikee's Avatar
capmikee capmikee is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 5,160
 
Plan: Weston A. Price, GFCF
Stats: 165/133/132 Male 5' 5"
BF:?/12.7%/?
Progress: 97%
Location: Philadelphia
Default

Huh? Calcium, magnesium, etc. are atomic elements. The only thing that can destroy them is a nuclear reaction. I thought if you don't add acid, they stay in the bones and don't dissolve into the stock.
Reply With Quote
  #50   ^
Old Wed, Mar-04-09, 16:18
awriter's Avatar
awriter awriter is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 1,096
 
Plan: Kwasniewski Ratios
Stats: 225/158/145 Female 65
BF:53%/24%/20%
Progress: 84%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by capmikee
Huh? Calcium, magnesium, etc. are atomic elements. The only thing that can destroy them is a nuclear reaction.

Sorry I wasn't clearer - I meant the acid would prevent the good stuff from melting into the stock. Just like the fish in cerviche stays firm, unlike fish 'cooked' by heat in fat or water. The acid does that.

Quote:
I thought if you don't add acid, they stay in the bones and don't dissolve into the stock.

I know that's what you think. Unfortunately, you've got it backwards. Take garlic and onion. If you don't cook them a bit in fat first, to get them soft, but add them raw to an acid like tomato sauce, the acid prevents them from melting into the sauce. Cooking them a bit first allows it.

By adding acid to your stock, you're doing the same thing to your bones. I'm not sure how I can state this more clearly.

Lisa
Reply With Quote
  #51   ^
Old Wed, Mar-04-09, 16:28
Nancy LC's Avatar
Nancy LC Nancy LC is offline
Experimenter
Posts: 25,863
 
Plan: DDF
Stats: 202/185.4/179 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 72%
Location: San Diego, CA
Default

Unfortunately Harold McGee doesn't say a peep about vinegar in broth in "On Food and Cooking". Gelatin comes from bones too and you can get that out of bones without acid. Maybe it's like that?
Reply With Quote
  #52   ^
Old Wed, Mar-04-09, 16:33
capmikee's Avatar
capmikee capmikee is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 5,160
 
Plan: Weston A. Price, GFCF
Stats: 165/133/132 Male 5' 5"
BF:?/12.7%/?
Progress: 97%
Location: Philadelphia
Default

I still don't know what it has to do with ceviche. Cooking, whether by heat or chemicals, is mostly hydrolysation of proteins. It doesn't have anything to do with minerals. Garlic and onion have oils that don't dissolve in water - that's why they need fat to get the flavors out. Maybe you're talking about the fat and collagen, and the flavorful meat proteins, not the minerals?
Reply With Quote
  #53   ^
Old Tue, Nov-10-09, 01:09
gadge's Avatar
gadge gadge is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 504
 
Plan: HCG
Stats: 28/22/16 Female 72 inches
BF:yes
Progress: 50%
Location: LA Metro
Default

Hey there. Capmikee, did you ever get the beef bone broth thing right? I just made some this weekend and it is--um, unremarkable. I just finished simmering, so I'll see if it sets up at all. I am guessing its not going to do much, and the flavor is just meh. I will try again this weekend. Any tips?
Reply With Quote
  #54   ^
Old Tue, Nov-10-09, 09:57
capmikee's Avatar
capmikee capmikee is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 5,160
 
Plan: Weston A. Price, GFCF
Stats: 165/133/132 Male 5' 5"
BF:?/12.7%/?
Progress: 97%
Location: Philadelphia
Default

No. I've decided to go simpler, but I still haven't made anything fantastic. Along the way, though, I discovered I don't need to add any herbs or vegetables to make great chicken broth.
Reply With Quote
  #55   ^
Old Tue, Nov-10-09, 10:14
Nancy LC's Avatar
Nancy LC Nancy LC is offline
Experimenter
Posts: 25,863
 
Plan: DDF
Stats: 202/185.4/179 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 72%
Location: San Diego, CA
Default

Well, I don't know if this will help your broth making but whenever I cook beef sous vide I get the most divine broth. It isn't a ton, just the juices that squeeze out of the meat. Enough to make a really nice gravy.
Reply With Quote
  #56   ^
Old Tue, Nov-10-09, 11:55
Squarecube's Avatar
Squarecube Squarecube is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 877
 
Plan: atkins/paleo/IF
Stats: 186.5/159.0/160 Male 5' 11"
BF:
Progress: 104%
Location: NYC
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by capmikee
Does anyone have suggestions for better beef stock? I just heard that it has lots of magnesium - I could definitely use that!


It wasn't until I got a pressure cooker that I made stock that I really liked.

Also, re: Beef stock. Cooks Illustrated tested different methods -- oh um, 2 years ago or so. They ended up adding ground beef to the stock -- surprise surprise -- the ground meat helped to get that meaty flavor.
Reply With Quote
  #57   ^
Old Tue, Nov-10-09, 15:09
gadge's Avatar
gadge gadge is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 504
 
Plan: HCG
Stats: 28/22/16 Female 72 inches
BF:yes
Progress: 50%
Location: LA Metro
Default

Capmikee: Thank you then. Next time I will go with no veg. It tasted to veggie to me anyway.

Nancy: Totally jealous of your sous vide set up. I might buy the Eades' sous vide thingy if I'm a good girl for the rest of the year.

Square: I considered a pressure cooker. I might try the ground beef. Thanks for the tip.
Reply With Quote
  #58   ^
Old Tue, Nov-10-09, 18:25
Nancy LC's Avatar
Nancy LC Nancy LC is offline
Experimenter
Posts: 25,863
 
Plan: DDF
Stats: 202/185.4/179 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 72%
Location: San Diego, CA
Default

Quote:
Nancy: Totally jealous of your sous vide set up. I might buy the Eades' sous vide thingy if I'm a good girl for the rest of the year.

You can make your own for under $300! Just buy the controller, $140, very large rice cooker $40-50 and foodsaver ($100ish) or some other device to evacuate the air out of bags.

I kind of laid out my setup in that Sous Vide thread in the kitchen forum.

My love to the Eades but I'd much rather have it piece meal so if something fails I can just replace that one piece, until I have more trust in their appliance's reliability.
Reply With Quote
  #59   ^
Old Tue, Nov-10-09, 23:35
gadge's Avatar
gadge gadge is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 504
 
Plan: HCG
Stats: 28/22/16 Female 72 inches
BF:yes
Progress: 50%
Location: LA Metro
Default

That's a really good point. Perhaps I'll go with the NancyLC-brand after all.
Reply With Quote
  #60   ^
Old Wed, Nov-11-09, 09:53
Squarecube's Avatar
Squarecube Squarecube is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 877
 
Plan: atkins/paleo/IF
Stats: 186.5/159.0/160 Male 5' 11"
BF:
Progress: 104%
Location: NYC
Default

Has anybody bought the eadesmachine? I'm tempted.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 19:27.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.