Quote:
Originally Posted by petra65
Yes Larry, I know Elle. She and I talked quite a bit on the old board. I saw here name on here too. I'll check out that thread.
Me and onderland........Well, yes, I got a new job, sold my house, bought a new one, one of my dogs died.........fell off the wagon but here I am again. I have been going to the new PP board but it isn't the same.
|
So sorry about your dog. I decided after Timmy, The Timid, had to be put down because of a ruptured disk, that I just could not go through that again. So I had planned to have no more pets, until some JERK (being nice
) dumped out a cat that took up residence in my barn. Very long story short - she presented me with three kittens that I got the cat rescue people to place for me, THANK GOODNESS! There was no chance for her to get placed, so she is spayed and an outside cat, even though she was obviously raised inside. I have a DIL that is allergic to cats, plus put up with cat hair for over twenty years, so do not want to go through that again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by petra65
I commented over there that I missed you. Randy told me I might find you here. Do you still eat sardines every day?
|
Yes, I am sitting here finishing up my breakfast of sardines.
Here is a post about my breakfast that will give you my macroneutrent counts for it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by petra65
Love the orchids. I tried to grow one once but I'm not usually good with inside plants. I do very well with my outside garden. Getting used to the new climate here has been a challenge. A lot of my new plants didn't fare so well last year because I haven't quite learned what grows best in this soil, sun conditions etc. Full sun in MS and full sun in PA are definitely not the same thing!
|
Oh, orchids are easy, if I can do it. There are a few key things to do. ONE, be patient, the branch secretary (that got me started) gave me two orchids when I retired in Feb. 2003. One finally bloomed last year and again this year, the other still has not.
TWO, repot new orchids immediately - I do not like the sphagnum moss that they are potted in from the nursery, it holds too much moisture next to the roots and makes them prone to rotting. I repot in a bark mix made especially for orchids. AND put them in clay pots not plastic. I like the shorter, fatter azalea pots, but also use the orchid pots with the slits in the sides. THREE, water once a week (or a suitable time depending upon how dry the air is, in the house where they are) by soaking the whole pot in a larger container where you can fill it so the water level is near the top of the pot. I soak mine for at least an hour and have sometimes got busy and left them in for five hours. Let them drain well when you lift them out of the soaking container. Then lightly spritz (finest mist you can get from a recycled spray cleaner - well rinsed- bottle or something similar) the leaves and exposed roots every day - I sometimes do it morning and night as I am checking on them, especially if they are growing a bloom stalk. I have to rotate the plant/pot to keep the stalk growing up straight. Otherwise it will bend excessively toward the window - light.
Quote:
Originally Posted by petra65
Larry-I checked out that thread. I didn't read all 61 pages of it. So far, I'm still happy with PP in it's original format. My plan at this point is to try it as written. It I get stuck I will move from hedonist to more purist eating to see what is stalling me first before I try any more drastic measures. If I'm still having problems, I'll try something else. Sound like a reasonable plan?
|
Yes, But PP/PPLP is really a high/higher fat plan. Someplace (should have bookmarked it!!) Dr. Mike said that they dare not say that because that would have immediately stopped to book from being published. So the brainwashing of the last thirty years has been so effective that even you have aversions to a high fat diet.
However lets look at the numbers. From PPLP, the highest protein minimum is 46 grams per meal per day, or 138 grams. Then let us allow a 50% excess, so that is 207 grams. This is 828 calories. Then if you allow 100 grams of carbohydrates, a level which is on the cusp of being too much for weight loss, since Dr. Mike blogged about the body need something like 150 grams of glucose in the blood per day to feed the red blood cells plus the few in the brain stem, kidneys, and ?forgot the other? that have no mitichondria which is necessary to metabolize fat, that is another 400 calories. Most sources use at least 1800 calories as the basic metabolic requirement. SO the remaining calories MUST be made up from fat, as that is the one remaining macro nutrient. The leaves 572 calories to come from fat, or only 64 grams of fat. BUT at that level of carbohydrates, it is a stretch to be called a PP/PPLP diet.
SO if you make carbohydrates in the 30 gram range and keep protein at the minimum, then you will need 1800 - 120 - 552 = 1128 calories, more than half of the required 1800, not low fat by any means! And if you use a more likely protein minimum of 34 grams per meal, then there is only 408 calories, not 552, leaving another 144 calories (16 grams) of fat to make up the energy lost by the reduced protein. That is then 70% fat.
PP/PPLP, even at a very hedonistic level, still needs a third of the calories from fat. But at more realistic values of carbohydrate and protein, the fat level gets to 50% easily. Most of the ladies on the High-Fatters thread are loosing quite well with high levels of fat, which I consider WELL within the PP/PPLP guide lines, so that is why I thought you should look at it and think about whether or not it might help you also.