Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Wed, Apr-05-06, 06:26
Leedslass Leedslass is offline
New Member
Posts: 14
 
Plan: Charles Clark is closest
Stats: 162/147/140 Female 170cm
BF:
Progress: 68%
Location: Leeds, Yorkshire, UK
Default Low-cal diet 'long-life benefits'

From today's BBC site. Note the reference to the importance of low insulin levels in longevity - and the "surprising" lack of reference to low-carb in achieving this!

Low-cal diet 'long-life benefits'

Most people in the study reduced their calorie intake
Scientists have found tangible signs that a low-calorie diet could reverse signs of ageing in the body.
A six-month study showed cutting calories lowered insulin levels and core body temperatures.

The Louisiana State University team said further studies were needed to confirm the findings, in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

A British expert said the research was interesting, but that many other factors affected life expectancy.

This study reinforces the importance of being a healthy weight

Dr Frankie Phillips, British Dietetic Association

It is known that reducing the amount of calories that rodents and other animals take in long-term lengthens their life.

It is thought that restricting calorie-intake affects processes in the body such as metabolism and sensitivity to insulin - as well as the health benefits from losing weight.

Less energy

Researchers from Louisiana State University studied 48 overweight men and women between March 2002 and August 2004.

All were healthy, but none exercised.

They were either put on an eating plan to maintain their existing weight, given a plan to cut their calorie intake by 25%.

A third group was told to restrict their calorie intake and exercise, and a fourth was put on a very low-calorie diet - 890 kcal a day until their weight had gone down by 15%, - followed by a weight maintenance diet.

After six months, the non-diet group had lost an average of 1% of their weight, the calorie restriction group, 10.4%, those who were on a calorie restricted diet plus exercise, 10% and the very low-calorie diet, 13.9%.

Fasting insulin levels - recorded between meals - were significantly reduced in all the three diet groups.

Low insulin levels is one of the common factors to have been recorded in people who live to over 100.

People on either of the calorie restriction diets had reduced average core body temperature, which has been previously suggested to be an aid to living longer.

Being cooler means the body does not have to expend as much energy.

In addition, there was a reduction in the amount of DNA damage - errors that occur when a cell divides - seen in the three groups.

Ageing reversal?

Dr Leonie Heilbronn, who led the research, said: "Our results indicate that prolonged calorie restriction caused a reversal in two of three previously reported biomarkers of longevity.

But she added: "Longer-term studies are required to determine if these effects are sustained and whether they have an effect on human ageing."

Dr Frankie Phillips, of the British Dietetic Association, said the research was interesting because it gave an insight into how losing weight affected the body.

But she said it did not tell the whole story about how long someone will live.

"Socio-economic factors and the environment can also influence how long you live."

She added: "We also know that being obese can cut up to nine or 10 years off someone's life. So by losing weight, you are effectively increasing your life expectancy by that long."

"This study reinforces the importance of being a healthy weight."

But Dr Phillips said she was concerned that some people in the study were put on extremely low-calorie diets - something she said people should only do for a short period of time and under the supervision of their GP or a dietician.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Wed, Apr-05-06, 07:34
Frogbreath Frogbreath is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 571
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 282/209/120 Female 5'2"
BF:
Progress: 45%
Location: Tallahassee, FL, US
Default

Unbelievable that they didn't even try the low carb approach since it is already known to lower insulin production.
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Wed, Apr-05-06, 07:50
kwikdriver's Avatar
kwikdriver kwikdriver is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,581
 
Plan: No grains, no sugar.
Stats: 001/045/525 Male 72
BF:
Progress: 8%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leedslass
A third group was told to restrict their calorie intake and exercise, and a fourth was put on a very low-calorie diet - 890 kcal a day until their weight had gone down by 15%, - followed by a weight maintenance diet.

After six months, the non-diet group had lost an average of 1% of their weight, the calorie restriction group, 10.4%, those who were on a calorie restricted diet plus exercise, 10% and the very low-calorie diet, 13.9%.


Shouldn't the people on the very low calorie diet have run into the terrifying "starvation mode," and stopped losing?
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Wed, Apr-05-06, 08:11
Nancy LC's Avatar
Nancy LC Nancy LC is offline
Experimenter
Posts: 25,865
 
Plan: DDF
Stats: 202/185.4/179 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 72%
Location: San Diego, CA
Default

Ah yes, the fattening air effect!
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Wed, Apr-05-06, 09:04
Sherrielee Sherrielee is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 411
 
Plan: Atkins/Bernstein
Stats: 240/171/130 Female 5'8"
BF:
Progress: 63%
Location: Southeast USA
Default

"Starvation Mode" is what always saves stranded folks....they actually stop burning calories!!! Not to mention how the sad Concentration Camp victims looked so blubbery when rescued!

What's up with this starvation mode thing. When I don't eat...exercise or not...I lose weight...are there REALLY folks out there that maintain their weight with little or no food?
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Wed, Apr-05-06, 09:31
KateIsGrea KateIsGrea is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 155
 
Plan: Schwarzbein (was CAD)
Stats: 185/172/130 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 24%
Location: Virginia
Default

Quote:
What's up with this starvation mode thing. When I don't eat...exercise or not...I lose weight...are there REALLY folks out there that maintain their weight with little or no food


Yes there are.

I was anorexic for ten years and did not just keep wasting away despite the fact I ate an average of 300 calories per day and exercized for at least two hours.

There were weeks I lost weight and weeks I did not. Your body fights you when you deprive it of food. Eventually you will lose weight. Only some of it will be fat. You will also start to eat your own muscle tissue and lose bone mass.

A starving body does very strange things that you would not expect. I do not reccomend it.
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Wed, Apr-05-06, 12:56
Whoa182's Avatar
Whoa182 Whoa182 is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 1,770
 
Plan: CRON / Zone
Stats: 118/110/110 Male 5ft 7"
BF:very low
Progress: 100%
Location: Cardiff
Default

Since you only ate 300 calories per day... no wonder why =/
Reply With Quote
  #8   ^
Old Wed, Apr-05-06, 13:54
Whoa182's Avatar
Whoa182 Whoa182 is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 1,770
 
Plan: CRON / Zone
Stats: 118/110/110 Male 5ft 7"
BF:very low
Progress: 100%
Location: Cardiff
Default

What is really excellent about this study is that all groups were given the same nutritional shakes and had the same recommended percentage of carbs/fat/protein. The control group was not just on a standard typical american diet so the toxicity effects didn't come into play here.

the same physiological changes that happen in animals had happened in this study on the three CR groups (body temperature never decreased for VLC).

It's really nice to see for the first time very good proof that Calorie Restriction itself causes less DNA damage.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 14:40.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.