Quote:
Originally Posted by Duparc
Gotbeer, I can see that we are engaging in an affray here.
|
An "affray", sir? I have no quarrel with your disinterest in engaging the Vegans - that is certainly a valid strategy, even if I think it an unwise one. I am simply positing that there is valid case for engagement as well.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duparc
I note too that you advertise yourself as an atheist yet manage to quote Proverbs. A Freudian slip, maybe?
|
Though others may have arrived at their atheism by differing paths, I am an Atheist not because I am ignorant of Scripture, but rather, because I am overly familiar with it. That particular proverb (31:6-9) is handy when engaging those of the faithful who are nominally teetotalers and who believe that eschewing alcohol has a sound Scriptural basis. It doesn't - at least, not in any way that makes sense to me, and particularly in light of Proverbs 31:6-9!
Likewise, God-talk in general makes little sense to me, in part because I'm not completely certain what people mean by "God", and in part because inconsistencies in conventional God-talk leave me with insurmountable doubts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duparc
I doubt, however, if morality is part of the constitution.
|
To which constitution do you refer, sir? My morality is innate in my human constitution. Where the morality of others may come from, I cannot say, but like God-talk, various views of morality often leave me puzzled.
For example, your own notion that the credulous should be defrauded into the purchase of goods of dubious value - certain bridges - seems to me to lack a compelling moral case.
In many U.S. jurisdictions, the willful failure to stop an easily preventable human death is called "Depraved Indifference", and is a serious criminal offense. In that sense, morality
is in the US constitution to the extent that the constitution allows such prosecutions to proceed.