Thu, Jan-02-20, 13:17
|
|
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25,669
|
|
Plan: Primal/P:E
Stats: 171/145/145
BF:
Progress: 100%
Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bkloots
I don't believe that seeing lingerie on large women on the fashion runway, high fashion on full figures on the red carpet, or celebrities on YouTube with large personalities and bodies constitutes the end of fat shaming.
|
Agreed, not by a long shot. Anyone who suggests that has never Read The Comments.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grav
Fat shaming, in my view, is the logical outcome of the still-prevailing narrative that all of the big questions in nutrition science have been definitively answered, case closed, lock the door and throw away the key. After all, where else could the fault possibly lie, if the science is so 100% watertight?
|
Very true, and I'll add that there's still an awful lot of money to be made by keeping the current status quo ( *cough* Weight Watchers etc *cough* ). Blame people for not being able to stick to a starvation diet, so you don't lose your customers.
Quote:
We don't begrudge smokers or alcoholics for struggling to overcome their addiction, because as a society, enough of us understand how difficult it really is to do so. The sooner the same becomes true for those struggling with obesity, the better.
|
True, though I think a major difference is that at least to an extent, most people can hide a chemical addiction. I'm met lots of smokers who I never knew smoked until they mentioned it or I saw a cigarette in their hand. There are lots of functional alcoholics and drug abusers. But you can't hide obesity - and with one glance, people assume they know a heck of a lot about your life. But point taken, if only the shamers acknowledged that there are a myriad of factors contributing to obesity, and would mind their own business.
Last edited by Kristine : Thu, Jan-02-20 at 13:23.
|