Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Mon, Apr-05-04, 10:03
gotbeer's Avatar
gotbeer gotbeer is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 2,889
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 280/203/200 Male 69 inches
BF:
Progress: 96%
Location: Dallas, TX, USA
Default "Americans shrinking as junk food takes its toll"

Americans shrinking as junk food takes its toll

Poverty and poor diet mean the average US man is getting smaller, while Europeans keep growing taller

Robin McKie, science editor

Sunday April 4, 2004, The Observer


http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story...1185457,00.html

Researchers have made a startling discovery: Americans are shrinking. A nation once famed for its strapping, well-nourished youth is gradually diminishing in physical stature.
By contrast, the heights of men and women from Europe are increasing inexorably. The average Dutchman, whose country produces the Continent's loftiest men, is now more than six feet tall - almost two inches above his American counterpart. And he is still growing. Across the Netherlands hotel owners are lengthening beds and raising door mantles to stop the nation's tall youth suffering from irreparable anatomical damage.

According to a New Yorker essay on the subject last week, Dutch ambulances are even having to keep their back doors open on many occasions to allow for the prodigious dimensions of their patients' legs.

New research has shown some unexpected disparities between statures of Americans and Europeans, indicating that recent social changes and diet are major influences on adult height.

For British men, too, are outstripping their transatlantic rivals. At the time of the American Revolution, the average US male was two inches taller than his British counterpart. Today he is almost half an inch shorter.

This surprising reappraisal of American and European physiques is the work of researcher John Komlos of Munich University. 'Much of the difference is due to the great social inequality that now exists in the United States,' Komlos told The Observer last week. 'In Europe, there is - in most countries - good health service provision for most members of society and plenty of protein in most people's diets. As a result, children do not suffer illnesses that would blight their growth or suffer problems of malnutrition. For that reason, we have continued to grow and grow.'

On the other hand, America has eight million people with no job, 40 million individuals with no health insurance, 35 million living below the poverty line, and a population that exists mainly on junk food. There, the rise in average height that marked its progress as a nation through the 19th and 20th centuries has stopped and has actually reversed - albeit very slightly - in recent years. Many Americans are rich and do well anatomically as a result, but there is a large underclass that is starting to drag the country down the stature charts.

This discovery, which has been revealed through research that Komlos has assembled over decades, amounts to an assault on the values of the free market economy espoused by Americans and provides powerful support for those who back European ideas about universal healthcare.

Fluctuations in human stature are not new and have occurred regularly throughout history. Our early hunter-gatherer ancestors were tall and lean. Later, as farming spread across the world, dense populations learnt to live on only a few standard crops and suffered considerable nutritional neglect. The result was a decline in stature.

Similarly, climatic changes have had a profound effect on human height - a physical attribute that is now regarded by historians, scientists and economists as a key indicator of the health of any group of people living at any particular time and place. For example, during the Little Ice Age, in which temperatures plummeted across the world between 1300 and the mid-19th century, there was a noticeable decrease in human stature.

'There are two possible mechanisms for this observation,' said Professor Chris Stringer of the Natural History Museum. 'Firstly, all mammals get shorter and rounder when climates cool. It is a physiological response to cold. Short, round bodies preserve heat better than tall cool ones.

'However, there is an alternative explanation for shrinking stature in bad weather. It means poor crops, and that in turn means malnutrition and, of course, the consequence of that is poor stature.

'Those tiny suits of armour that you see when you visit the Tower of London were worn by people who were badly nourished. During winter they would have only salt meat and a few vegetables to live on. That's not going to help you grow very well.'

Modern society now protects humans from such problems, though in recent years it has become clear that political factors are having some effect on nutrition levels and proper diet and therefore stature. And it is in this arena that Komlos has made his key discoveries.

Through painstaking investigations he has calculated the heights of men at different times over our recent historical past. This shows that, around 1850, Americans - blessed with Western technology that allowed its citizens to spread unstoppably across the United States - lived relatively fine lives that let its menfolk reach an average height of 5ft 9in. By contrast, Dutchmen were only able to reach about 5ft 7in.

By the early 20th century the average American man was still about the same height as his predecessor. But the average Dutchman had nearly caught up and was only about half an inch shorter.

But in the 20th century Americans were overtaken. The average US male is now about 5ft 10in. The average Dutchman is just over 6ft.

More importantly, the latter is continuing his rise in average height. The Americans have long since stopped growing and, according to some measures, may actually be getting smaller. 'In relative terms, Americans are certainly shrinking in comparison with Europeans,' says Komlos.

One possible explanation lies with immigration. As more Mexicans and Chinese enter the US, these individuals may lower the average height, it is argued. But statisticians dismiss this suggestion. During the 19th century the country took in millions of malnourished, and therefore small, people. Yet Americans remained the tallest people in the world at that time.

In fact, the very idea that various peoples are programmed, on average, to be short or tall is thrown into doubt by Komlos's work. Apart from a few rare races, such as African pygmies who are genetically programmed to have low stature, virtually everyone in the world has the potential to reach the same average height as the Dutch, and that includes the Mexicans, Chinese, Inuit, and other peoples who are not usually noted for their stature.

To achieve that status will require some arduous social engineering. The Dutch health service, with its magnificent support services for pregnant woman (quality of life in the womb is a key factor in determining future health and height) and its high-protein diets based on dairy food, will not be easy to emulate in a world whose population is now soaring towards seven billion.

Growth Spurt

The steady increase in the height of British youngsters which began over a century ago continues to manifest itself today, particularly among girls.

According to figures provided by the Child Growth Foundation, the height of the average British nine-year-old girl rose from 4ft 4in (130.6cm) in 1983 to 4ft 5in (132.7cm) in 2003, while the average British nine-year-old boy increased from 4ft 4in to just under 4ft 5in.

'It would appear that girls are doing slightly better than boys, but that may simply be due to the fact that girls are reaching puberty earlier and earlier, and are beginning their adolescent growth spurt before boys,' said Tam Fry, of the foundation.

The increase is also roughly in line with the general trend observed over the past 100 years that the average child is increasing in height at a rate of between four and five inches a century.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Mon, Apr-05-04, 11:58
Nancy LC's Avatar
Nancy LC Nancy LC is offline
Experimenter
Posts: 25,863
 
Plan: DDF
Stats: 202/185.4/179 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 72%
Location: San Diego, CA
Default

Of course, the assumption here is that taller is better and I believe that isn't necessarily true. I think I recall reading that tall people die earlier than short ones do.
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Mon, Apr-05-04, 13:41
Elihnig's Avatar
Elihnig Elihnig is offline
Don't dream it be it
Posts: 5,736
 
Plan: Low Carb
Stats: 292.4/272.0/165 Female 70 inches
BF:
Progress: 16%
Location: Maine
Default

Wasn't there another study done about how fruit juices stunt children's growth?



Beth
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Mon, Apr-05-04, 14:10
adkpam's Avatar
adkpam adkpam is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,320
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 185/151/145 Female 67 inches
BF:
Progress: 85%
Location: Adirondack Mountains, NY
Default

The way I read it, Americans are substituting what used to be known as "good protein" with sugary junk. And it shows.
Yes, it's possible for a population's long term health to suffer due to what might be called excess nutrition, but these studies are called into question when they start teasing out what kind of nutrition is supplied...in general, height at maturity can represent a genetic maximum, based on the amounts of nutrients available. If it's in the form of protein and other nutrient dense foods, the higher average height is a result of good nutrition. If it is as a result of higher calories, but not nutrition, the body uses it to create height, but with a lower overall health profile.
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Mon, Apr-05-04, 14:12
Lisa N's Avatar
Lisa N Lisa N is offline
Posts: 12,028
 
Plan: Bernstein Diabetes Soluti
Stats: 260/-/145 Female 5' 3"
BF:
Progress: 63%
Location: Michigan
Default

Quote:
In fact, the very idea that various peoples are programmed, on average, to be short or tall is thrown into doubt by Komlos's work. Apart from a few rare races, such as African pygmies who are genetically programmed to have low stature, virtually everyone in the world has the potential to reach the same average height as the Dutch, and that includes the Mexicans, Chinese, Inuit, and other peoples who are not usually noted for their stature.


Personally, I think genetics does play a part in how tall you will eventually become. For example, I have two daughters, both with the same father. One is in the 80th percentile for height (4' 5" at 9 years old..hmmm...same as the British girls who are supposedly taller) and the other is about the 5th percentile for height (3' 11" at 8 years old). Since they live in the same household, received the same prenatal and preventative medical care and eat the same meals, according to the theory above, they should be roughly the same height when compared against their sibling at the same age. They are not. At age 8, my oldest daughter was 4' 2" tall.
I myself came from a family that did not lack for anything and we all had more than adequate health care and nutrition. My mother was 5' 6". I'm 5' 3".
While genetics plays a big role in determining your greatest possible height, whether or not you achieve that height does depend on good nutrition and health care, but to say or imply that stature is influenced soley by nutrition is false, IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Mon, Apr-05-04, 15:30
ttc#2's Avatar
ttc#2 ttc#2 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,087
 
Plan: atkins
Stats: 164/146.0/135 Female 64 in
BF:38.5/31/20
Progress: 62%
Location: Texas
Default

I am not familiar with European Newspapers and have no idea about the reputation of the paper from which this article orginates, but I always question statistics that do not include citations from researchers published in peer reviewed journals.

Statistics are very easy to generate, valid conclusions are another matter all together.

Who are the researchers? Where did they publish their findings?
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Mon, Apr-05-04, 19:43
woodpecker woodpecker is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 265
 
Plan: atkins
Stats: 185/180/165 Male 68 inches
BF:25
Progress: 25%
Location: Nova Scotia
Default

Expert:Lucy Mackenzie
Date:9/24/2001
Subject:Japanese Getting Taller?

Question
Hello Lucy,
I wonder if you could help to shed some light on a subject that I have discussing with my husband..why are the Japanese people becoming taller? In the times of the Samurai, my husband says that the average height of a Japanese man was around 5'3". Nowadays Japanese are taller people. Does this have anything to do with their change of eating habits, i.e more Western and junk food?
Thanks Lucy!

Answer
Dear Jean

You are right. If you are in Japan for any length of time you will notice that the younger the person the taller and more filled out they seem to be. This is because the Japanese traditionally ate a vegetarian based diet, and especially during the war they lived on just rice and vegetables and maybe a little fish. They did not have many dairy products either to help their skeletons to grow.
These days though, being a wealthy country with access to imported meat and dairy, they are very healthy and tall. On a personal note I noticed that young men benefit from this especially well, if you get my meaning.
Of course, obesity is now a problem with young children and I think they eat way too much sugar and junk as a nation.

HOpe this helped.
Regards
Lucy
ref: http://experts.about.com/q/2884/1883748.htm
Reply With Quote
  #8   ^
Old Mon, Apr-05-04, 20:35
liz175 liz175 is offline
Lowcarb since 7/2002
Posts: 5,991
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 360/232/180 Female 5'9"
BF:BMI 53.2/34.3/?
Progress: 71%
Location: U.S.: Mid-Atlantic
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lisa N
Personally, I think genetics does play a part in how tall you will eventually become......While genetics plays a big role in determining your greatest possible height, whether or not you achieve that height does depend on good nutrition and health care, but to say or imply that stature is influenced soley by nutrition is false, IMO.


I read the original article in The New Yorker that this article was based on and that is exactly what it said -- most size differences within populations are because of genetics, but average size differences between populations are the result of nutrition. Some people are genetically programmed to be shorter and some people are genetically programmed to be taller. However, that doesn't explain shifts and differences among the same population -- the Dutch are much taller on average than they were a generation ago and those of us in the United States are actually getting somewhat smaller than we were a generation ago (even adjusting for all the immigration).
Reply With Quote
  #9   ^
Old Tue, Apr-06-04, 23:23
alaskaman alaskaman is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 870
 
Plan: Dr Bernstein
Stats: 195/175/170
BF:
Progress: 80%
Location: alaska
Default

I read years ago that a whole generation of british people were short, after ww2, food rationing continued for several years, supposedly the officials miscalculated the amounts necessary. Don't know if this is true or not.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 15:33.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.