Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Mark Forums Read Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Sat, Mar-08-14, 00:35
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 26,727
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/153/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 109%
Location: UK
Default ‘No proven link’ between cancer and eating meat

Quote:
From The Times
London, UK
8 March, 2014

‘No proven link’ between cancer and eating meat



Warnings that eating meat could be as dangerous as smoking are overblown because the evidence on the link between food and cancer is inconclusive, according to a leading expert.

Professor Tim Key, of the University of Oxford’s cancer epidemiology unit, said that it was difficult to isolate the connection between different types of food and serious illnesses because “everything you eat is correlated with everything else you do”.

“When it comes to diet and cancer people just didn’t realise how difficult this was going to be,” he said.

Professor Key, one of the foremost experts on the link between diet and disease, said that nutritional science was in its infancy and so scientists did not yet have the evidence to back up many of the bold claims made about eating meat, sugar and carbohydrates.

He is running a mass-observational study on vegetarians, which involves up to 70,000 British people. By contrast, a widely reported study, which found that a diet rich in animal protein led to a fourfold increase in the risk of death from cancer or diabetes among those under 65, surveyed 6,381 people.

Professor Key said that while the vegetarians in his study ate less animal protein and less saturated fat, his published research showed that their rates of early death compared with those of meat-eaters were exactly the same.

He also found that there was no difference in the rates of bowel cancer between the two groups, despite the widely held view that eating a lot of red meat, particularly processed meat, was linked to the disease.

“There is a lot of evidence that meat may have an effect on bowel cancer, but that would imply vegetarians had a lower risk of bowel cancer. This we didn’t see,” Professor Key said. “I think we have to conclude, we don’t understand what goes on in the mechanism of bowel cancer, it’s not clear at all

“In relation to cancer and diet, the only two things that are unequivocal are obesity and alcohol, both cause cancer. There are loads and loads of studies and they are completely consistent. Once you get onto other things, meat, bacon, fibre, the data is just not clear.”

He also addressed food regimes such as the Atkins, Dukan and Paleo diets which advocate cutting carbohydrates in favour of protein to lose weight.

Pointing to the fact that vegetarians eat less protein and are thinner than meat-eaters, Professor Key said “that is not compatible with the arguments that lower-protein diets make you fat”.

There is evidence that meat-eating is bad for the heart, with vegetarians showing a significantly reduced risk of heart disease, but the evidence is less clear for other diseases.

Professor Key said that there were areas in rural China and Japan where the population ate little meat but the stroke rate was surprisingly high. He is a vegan, for ethical rather than health reasons, and, despite the lack of conclusive evidence, a second expert, Walter Willett, of the Harvard School of Public Health, has also restricted his meat consumption.

Professor Willett, who is the most cited author in the science of nutrition, eats read meat only once or twice a year, and explained that even when the science was not cast-iron, it seemed plausible to him that this was a healthy change. “The relation with cancer is complicated; it depends on the type of animal product, time of life and type of cancer,” he said. It made sense to cut meat intake because “being smart means making decisions on probabilities; to put odds in our favour”.

Conflicting advice

  • Professor Valter Longo, University of Southern California Excess protein increases risk of cancer — a chicken breast could be “as deadly as a cigarette”
  • British Nutrition Foundation No evidence of link between average red meat consumption and cancer
  • European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition Processed meat could cause one in 30 early deaths
  • World Cancer Research Fund Eat no more than 70g processed meat a week; children should have none
  • Paleo Factory-farmed meat and fish cause cancer. Eat grass-fed beef, free-range chickens, wild salmon.
  • Dr Katharina Nimptsch, Harvard Eating more chicken as a teenager reduces likelihood of colon cancer
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/healt...icle4027103.ece
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Sat, Mar-08-14, 16:06
Dodger's Avatar
Dodger Dodger is offline
Posts: 8,764
 
Plan: Paleoish/Keto
Stats: 225/167/175 Male 71.5 inches
BF:18%
Progress: 116%
Location: Longmont, Colorado
Default

I cut carbs for the same reason that Willett cut red meat.
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Sat, Mar-08-14, 18:34
Merpig's Avatar
Merpig Merpig is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 7,582
 
Plan: EF/Fung IDM/keto
Stats: 375/225.4/175 Female 66.5 inches
BF:
Progress: 75%
Location: NE Florida
Default

And just today I was listening to a news quiz program on the radio that referenced this study:
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/health/...-earlier-death/
Quote:
Too much meat and cheese may be a recipe for disaster, according to a new study that links the consumption of animal-based protein to an increased risk of early death for people in their 50s and early 60s.

The study of more than 6,000 American adults found those between the ages of 50 and 65 with diets high in animal protein were 74 percent more likely to meet an untimely end than those who consumed less animal protein or got their protein from non-animal sources.

For deaths due to cancer, the risk was four times higher, according to the study published today in the journal Cell Metabolism.

Eating plant-based proteins like nuts and beans seemed to reverse the unhealthy trend. And after the age of 65, the trend dissipated, suggesting that a diet high in protein from animals or plants can be beneficial later in life.

“The main message is to go to a safe level of protein and try as much as possible to have those proteins come from plant-based products,” said study author Dr. Valter D. Longo,
I must say that at the end they did go on to say:
Quote:
Editor’s note: This story has been updated to reflect the fact that Dr. Longo founded a company that sells plant-based meal replacements.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 23:25.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.