Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Tue, Aug-19-03, 10:15
gotbeer's Avatar
gotbeer gotbeer is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 2,889
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 280/203/200 Male 69 inches
BF:
Progress: 96%
Location: Dallas, TX, USA
Default "Weigh stars' secrets against real-people plans"

Reel diets, real results

Weigh stars' secrets against real-people plans

Tuesday, August 19, 2003


link to article

The fault, Dear Reader, is not in our stars but in ourselves that we are tubby things.

Apparently.

I mean, the stars do try to show us the skinny way.

Pick up the The National Inquirer at the grocery and read "Lose Ten Pounds In Ten Minutes!"

Turn on "Entertainment Tonight" when you get home, or log into iVillage.com next time you sit down at a computer.

The fabulous dietary wisdom of the stars -- and their extreme new eating plan du jour -- will probably knock the pounds right off you.

Atkins got you down? Weight Watchers too traditional?

How about these tips?


Herbal tea and vitamins keep Demi Moore's system cleaned out and filled up!


Supermodel Claudia Schiffer eats absolutely nothing but fruit before noon!


Former Hollywood hottie Minnie Driver dropped 30 pounds by spirituality!

These are actual eating strategies certified by the Tabloid Dietary Institute. You can check them out at the above-mentioned sources and try 'em until the fat globules start to melt away.

There are other, more sensible star stories.

Renee Zellweger used the The Zone to get back to "Nurse Betty" shape after packing on pounds for "Bridget Jones," and Jennifer Aniston lost 30 pounds in "the Zone."

The Barry Sears "Zone"combination of 40 percent carbs, 30 percent protein and 30 percent fat is designed to keep insulin levels under control.

Insulin and our societal insensitivity to it are the basis for low-carb eating plans. The diets are most popular among actors, models and dancers -- all people who have to look good for a living.

But the calculations required to do the 40/30/30 split day in and day out can be daunting.

For a low-concept version of low-carb, try Sugar Busters. It seemed to work for Sharon Stone and Tori Spelling.

The Atkins Diet, which helped Catherine Zeta-Jones lose her post-pregnancy pudge, was the first and still is the most popular of low-carb plans.

It's also the most controversial.

For decades after its introduction by the late Dr. Robert Atkins, it was ridiculed by nutritionists -- but not subjected to rigorous testing.

Now it is being studied, thanks in part to a New York Times story last year by science writer Gary Taubes.

My own informal study, based on what people tell about their eating, is this:

In the Hall of Weight Loss, there are two pews. One is low-fat. One is low-carb. Men do better on low-carb, women do better on low-fat.

Let me introduce you to three women colleagues who, over the past six months, have lost the equivalent of Lance Armstrong.

You may have seen their work in the paper.


Mary Bradley, feature writer and columnist, who lost 53 pounds;


Pauline Clea, Home &Garden editor, who lost 65 pounds, and


Ellen Lyon, business writer, who lost 55 pounds.

How'd they do it?

Celebrity diet devotees, you're gonna hate this: Weight Watchers.

Weight Watchers has a way of reinventing its eating plan to suit public tastes. With the new plan coming in September, WW has tweaked the idea of bonus points.

Briefly, WW calculates points for just about everything edible by considering the fat content, number of calories and the fiber. By adding points throughout the day, dieters decide what to eat.

Here's a typical eating day for Clea: BREAKFAST: 6 points 1 cup of Fiber One cereal (2 points) 8 oz. of fat free milk (2 points) 1 packet of Equal (0 points) 1 6 oz. banana (2 points) SNACK: 1 point 1 cup watermelon (1 point) LUNCH: 5 points 2 cups of salad: greens, carrots, peppers, tomatoes, cucumber (0) 2 tablespoon lite olive oil vinaigrette salad dressing (2 points) 3 oz. of grilled chicken breast (3 points) SNACK: 3 points 1 cup watermelon (1 point) 1 cup light vanilla yogurt (2 points) DINNER: 5 points Egg white omelet (1/4 cup egg whites, 1 slice of fat free cheese, and 1/4 each of mushrooms, onions, tomatoes) (3 points) 2 slices of 40 calorie wheat bread (1 point) 2 tablespoon of fat free margarine (1 point) SNACK: 5 points 2 cups of broccoli florets (0) 4 tablespoon of fat free ranch dressing (4 points) 1 fat free string cheese (1) Total points: 25

In a day, Clea's allowed from 22 to 27 points.

But under the new Weight Watcher regime, she can eat the minumum 22 points a day and bank the rest for a Friday night blowout or a major Sunday dinner.

The idea is that eating the same calories day after day feels as dull to your metabolism as it does to your appetite. The body likes variety and responds to it.

All the counting and diary-keeping makes it easier to follow the program, Bradley believes.

"If you're not well-organized when you start, it will help you be," she said.The major factor that most WW members mention is the weekly meeting, both for the encouragement from others and the discussions of how to eat and why.

PAT CARROLL: 255-8149 or pcarroll~patriot-news.com
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Tue, Aug-19-03, 11:46
RosaAlta's Avatar
RosaAlta RosaAlta is offline
100% pork rind free
Posts: 457
 
Plan: Atkins-ish
Stats: 215/182.5/180 Female 5 ' 10 1/2"
BF:
Progress: 93%
Location: USA
Default

Just reading that sample daily menu reminds me of how much I hated Weight Watchers. I tried them in college and had a hell of a time. They used to have this little clicker you carried around all day and recorded your fat grams & glasses of water on. I hated clicking everything and looking everything up before I ate it. Plus, their weight charts (in 1994) were outdated and expected me to be way too thin. I hated having to set my goal by their standards. When I hit 165 (my goal now), I am going to look like a million bucks! But WW would say I was still too heavy. Screw them.
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Thu, Aug-21-03, 16:02
Dodger's Avatar
Dodger Dodger is offline
Posts: 8,769
 
Plan: Paleoish/Keto
Stats: 225/167/175 Male 71.5 inches
BF:18%
Progress: 116%
Location: Longmont, Colorado
Default

Weight Watchers is essentially a low calorie diet that uses calorie counting. Each point is equivalent to so many calories.

Mike
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 21:32.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.