Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Mark Forums Read Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Thu, Nov-12-20, 04:12
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 26,727
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/153/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 109%
Location: UK
Default Everyone knows salt is bad for you. Sorry, but everyone is wrong

Not low carb per se, but I'm sure it will be of interest anyway:


Joanna Blythman: Everyone knows salt is bad for you. Sorry, but everyone is wrong

https://www.heraldscotland.com/news...everyone-wrong/

Quote:
THE tectonic plates that underpin dietary gospel are shifting. Previously unassailable tablets of nutritional stone are rocking on their very foundations. The first mighty rumble of late was the call from top US scientists, including former members of the US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, to lift the dietary guideline limits on saturated fat.

“There is no strong scientific evidence that the current population-wide upper limits on commonly consumed saturated fats in the US will prevent cardiovascular disease or reduce mortality. A continued limit on these fats is not justified.”

Mind you, the anti-sat fat paradigm was already melting away, like butter on a hot day.

Then came another major shift, with the recent publication in the European Heart Journal of a paper, whose authors include two former presidents of the American Heart Association, challenging official recommendations on salt: "These guidelines have been developed without... high-quality evidence that low sodium intake reduces cardiovascular events”.

They conclude that, contrary to all the salt restriction advice we’ve been given, “most of the world’s population consume a moderate range of dietary sodium,1-2 teaspoons of salt a day), that is not associated with increased cardiovascular risk”.

I have long been sceptical about government advice on salt consumption. Salt has been damned by public health gurus because it can raise blood pressure, which in turn can contribute to heart attacks and stroke.

Yet the evidence apparently implicating salt has long been shaky. A major 2014 review of data on salt and health concluded that we are targeting the wrong white crystals.

“Clinicians should shift focus away from salt and focus greater attention to the likely more consequential food additive: sugar.”

Drastically reducing our salt intake can even be quite risky, it seems. A major study of 100,000 people in 2015 found that those who followed lower salt intake guidelines actually had more heart trouble than those who didn’t.

I’m someone, like many others I know, all women, whose blood pressure tends to be on the low, not high side. And being Scottish, brought up on porridge prepared with salt, not sugar, seasoning with salt is just part of the cooking process for me.

A crock of grey sea salt sits beside my hob, I add the flakes or ground crystals with my fingers, and taste dishes as I prepare them to achieve the right level of saltiness. I prefer this less refined salt to the standard salt; it’s much easier to overdose with the latter, I find.

I also relish salty ingredients, such as aged Parmesan cheese, capers and anchovies. Yet such ingredients, analysed in terms of how much salt is in every 100 grams of food, provoke condemnation from old-school, anti-salt stalwarts. Flashing red lights all round.

But it seems to me that, used judiciously, they enliven other blander ingredients. I have seen no evidence to suggest that a normal level of salt used in traditional home cooking is bad for you.

But my body revolts against many types of salty ultra-processed food: Pringles, flavoured crisps, stock cubes, leave me gasping for water. Neither bacon nor cheese, despite being categorised as high salt foods, has that effect.

As it turns out, most of the salt people in the UK consume is in ultra-processed food, only 15-20% of our dietary salt intake comes from home cooking, or adding salt at the table.

Salt figures prominently in the food manufacturer’s flavour enhancing toolkit, along with sugar and synthetic flavourings. If you mainly prepare your own home-cooked food from scratch, when you taste common convenience foods, such as ready meals, they do taste surreally salty by comparison.

But I’m not convinced that seasoning your food with salt at home is anything other than a good idea. It seems to me that this natural, traditional flavour enhancer has been damned unfairly because of its association with high tech ultra-processed foods, wherein it keeps company with palate-tricking additives, and shockingly high amounts of added sugar, to manipulate our tastebuds.

I remember tasting salt-free bread in Tuscany. It was a penance to eat. I heard that this practice stemmed from a war-time shortage of salt, through necessity, not inspiration.

We’ve been using salt to preserve and season our food for centuries. It is a crucial kitchen condiment.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Thu, Nov-12-20, 09:42
GRB5111's Avatar
GRB5111 GRB5111 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 4,041
 
Plan: Very LC, Higher Protein
Stats: 227/186/185 Male 6' 0"
BF:
Progress: 98%
Location: Herndon, VA
Default

One need only to read "The Salt Fix" by James DiNicolantonio to understand the bizarre role salt has been placed in by the medical and BP research communities. It is the essence of life and is essential for humans to live. It also makes my food taste great without need for much of anything else. This article, particularly the comment about substituting cutting back on sugar rather than salt, "the other white crystal," echos DiNicolantonio's writings directly.
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Thu, Nov-12-20, 11:44
Dodger's Avatar
Dodger Dodger is offline
Posts: 8,764
 
Plan: Paleoish/Keto
Stats: 225/167/175 Male 71.5 inches
BF:18%
Progress: 116%
Location: Longmont, Colorado
Default

The one thing that greatly reduced my blood pressure was switching from a low-fat eating plan to a low-carb eating plan. I salt my meats quite liberally.
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Thu, Nov-12-20, 11:47
Ms Arielle's Avatar
Ms Arielle Ms Arielle is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 19,214
 
Plan: atkins, carnivore 2023
Stats: 200/211/163 Female 5'8"
BF:
Progress: -30%
Location: Massachusetts
Default

Ditto !!

When my bp creeps up , it's a reminder to get back to LC.

Three salts in my kitchen : sea salt (usually pink), iodized salt and No Salt (for the potassium).

Lack of salt leads to terrible muscle cramps, from just feet to feet to inner thigh. I salt LIBERALLY.
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Sun, Nov-22-20, 10:23
WereBear's Avatar
WereBear WereBear is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 14,674
 
Plan: EpiPaleo/Primal/LowOx
Stats: 220/130/150 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 129%
Location: USA
Default

In fact, the lower carb one eats, the more a person NEEDS more salt.

I got the pink Himalyan and love it! The regular salt is metallic tasting to me now.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 15:34.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.