Thu, May-26-05, 12:32
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 136
|
|
Plan: SugarBusters
Stats: 298/198/170
BF:
Progress: 78%
Location: Idaho
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGO1223
Been reading up on G.I. and know that carbs are still somewhat restricted.
Given that fact, and other rules combined, I'm curious, would one actually go into ketosis, or would the carbs negate that? Also, does weight loss tend to be a bit slower than L.C.? If ketosis is a sure sign that fats are being burned, if you are not in ketosis, what is the science behind losing weight? Is it simply less carb intake? Or a combination of factors?
I hope this makes sense.
I have 6 lbs. to lose after going off L.C. and regaining after meeting my goal, and am looking for something less restrictive, so that I can have more fruit, especially during summer. Plus it would be easier to cook for DH and myself at the same time. I just want those 6 lbs. gone, and not risk gaining more.
Thanks!
|
I have been in ketosis and out of ketosis on SugarBusters. Ketosis is not the only sign that fat is being burned, in fact some people will NEVER show ketosis on the sticks.
It is true for me that weight loss is slower on SuB, but it is the only way that I can lose while still cooking for my family. My entire family is now "doing" SuB.
If you want to chat about SuB drop me a private message.
|