Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Thu, Sep-30-10, 14:05
liddie01's Avatar
liddie01 liddie01 is offline
Butter is Better!
Posts: 5,894
 
Plan: Atkins OWL
Stats: 234/220.4/160 Female 5"8.5"
BF:its back again!
Progress: 18%
Location: Mount Carmel, Pa.
Default Low Carb on CBS News

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Tue, Oct-05-10, 05:29
liddie01's Avatar
liddie01 liddie01 is offline
Butter is Better!
Posts: 5,894
 
Plan: Atkins OWL
Stats: 234/220.4/160 Female 5"8.5"
BF:its back again!
Progress: 18%
Location: Mount Carmel, Pa.
Default

NEW YORK, Aug. 3, 2010
Report: Low-Carb Diet Beats Low-Fat
Over Time, Low-Carb Diet Trumps Low-Fat Diet on "Good" Cholesterol and Works Just as Well to Lose Weight

* Font size
* Print
* E-mail
* Share
* 4 Comments

Like this Story? Share it:
Share On Facebook
0diggsdigg

*

(CBS)

* Stories
* Proposed Diet Meds under Fed Scrutiny
* How to Weekend-Proof Your Diet

(AP) Over the long term, a low-carb diet works just as well as a low-fat diet at taking off the pounds - and it might be better for your heart, new research suggests.

Both diets improved cholesterol in a two-year study that included intensive group counseling. But those on the low-carbohydrate diet got a bigger boost in their so-called good cholesterol, nearly twice as much as those on low-fat.

In previous studies, low-carb diets have done better at weight loss at six months, but longer-term results have been mixed. And there's been a suggestion of better cholesterol from low-carb eating.

The latest test is one of the longest to compare the approaches. At the end of two years, average weight loss was the same for both - about 15 pounds or 7 percent.

The key difference was in HDL, or good cholesterol: a 23 percent increase from low-carb dieting compared to a 12 percent improvement from low-fat, said Gary Foster, director of Temple University's Center for Obesity Research and Education, who led the federally funded study.

He said the low-carb boost is the kind one might get from medicines that improve HDL.

"For a diet, that's pretty impressive," Foster said.

The findings, published in Tuesday's Annals of Internal Medicine, are based on a study of 307 adults, two-thirds of them women. Participants were obese but didn't have cholesterol problems or diabetes.

Half followed a low-carb diet modeled after the Atkins' plan and half went on a low-calorie, low-fat diet. All attended group sessions to help them change bad eating habits, get more active and stick to their diets.

The volunteers had periodic checks of their weight, blood, bone density and body composition. After two years, there were no major differences between diet groups, except in good cholesterol. Why the low-carb diet had a bigger effect on good cholesterol isn't known, the researchers said.

As low-carb plans became popular, experts feared the diet would drive up the risk of heart disease because it allows more fat. The latest results suggest those concerns are unfounded, Foster said. In the low-carb group, there was an early rise in "bad" cholesterol, the kind that builds up in arteries. But after two years, both groups ended up with similar improvements to bad cholesterol.

The study's strengths include its size, length and its multiple locations - Denver, Philadelphia and St. Louis, said Dr. William Yancy, of the Durham VA Medical Center in North Carolina.

"These are results we should have a lot of confidence in," said Yancy, who has done similar diet research but was not involved in the study.

Foster, the study leader, said dieters should be less concerned about which diet to use, and focus on finding the support or technique - like writing down what they eat - that keeps them on track.

"It doesn't make a difference for weight loss how you get there," he said.

With the current obesity epidemic, more than one way is needed to attack the problem, Yancy said.

"Both of these are options. These diets work," he said.
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Tue, Oct-05-10, 05:48
dymondsn's Avatar
dymondsn dymondsn is offline
New Member
Posts: 18
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 175/156/140 Female 504
BF:
Progress: 54%
Default

Thanks for posting this- always good to have some reaffirmation about Atkins.
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Tue, Oct-05-10, 08:24
Groggy60's Avatar
Groggy60 Groggy60 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 486
 
Plan: IF/Low carb
Stats: 219/201/172 Male 70 inches
BF:
Progress: 38%
Location: Ottawa, ON
Default

Amazing they don't ever seem to report on insulin levels in these studies. The cure for type 2 diabetes. That news might put an end to low fat forever.
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Tue, Oct-05-10, 08:45
costello22's Avatar
costello22 costello22 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,544
 
Plan: VLC
Stats: 265.4/238.8/199 Female 5'5.5"
BF:
Progress: 40%
Default

Hallelujah! I shared that on my facebook page.
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Tue, Oct-05-10, 09:39
RobLL RobLL is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,648
 
Plan: generalized low carb
Stats: 205/180/185 Male 67
BF:31%/14?%/12%
Progress: 125%
Location: Pacific Northwest
Default

What is interesting is that weight loss was about the same for both. Those of us who are diabetic don't have a choice - but for many either will work.
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Tue, Oct-05-10, 12:36
M Levac M Levac is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 6,498
 
Plan: VLC, mostly meat
Stats: 202/200/165 Male 5' 7"
BF:
Progress: 5%
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobLL
What is interesting is that weight loss was about the same for both. Those of us who are diabetic don't have a choice - but for many either will work.

Low carb will be better in all things measured including weight lost in spite of an otherwise unrestricted intake. See here and there:

http://forum.lowcarber.org/showthread.php?t=418030
http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/...the-mainstream/

It's interesting that you say diabetics don't have a choice. It's my understanding that diabetes is caused by carbohydrate poisoning. It seems that if one isn't diabetic yet, they'll become so eventually unless they go low carb now and for pretty much the rest of their life. It's like saying it's fine to eat poison unless you are already poisoned, then it's not fine anymore. Or, it's fine to drink until you are drunk, at which point it's not fine to drink anymore.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:15.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.