Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Exercise Forums: Active Low-Carbers > Advanced/High Intensity
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Fri, May-15-09, 14:24
KrisR KrisR is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 172
 
Plan: moderate carb
Stats: 300/209/154 Female 5'5"
BF:
Progress: 62%
Location: NSW, Australia
Default Periodization anyone?

Does anyone have any knowledge and/or experience with 'periodization'? From my preliminary research, it looks like it's just mixing up your exercising routine but perhaps I'm overly simplifying it.

I guess the thing that's driving my question is whether it's of maximum benefit to the body to alternate between traditional strength training (2-3 sets of 10-12 reps) with slow cadence strength training (1 set of 3-7 reps at slow speed). I've been doing slow burn for nearly 6 months now and although I'm maintaining my condition, I'm not reducing inches any longer.

What do you all think?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Thu, Jun-04-09, 12:56
Scars Scars is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 231
 
Plan: Personalized
Stats: 190/178/170 Male 5'8"
BF:
Progress:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KrisR
Does anyone have any knowledge and/or experience with 'periodization'? From my preliminary research, it looks like it's just mixing up your exercising routine but perhaps I'm overly simplifying it.

I guess the thing that's driving my question is whether it's of maximum benefit to the body to alternate between traditional strength training (2-3 sets of 10-12 reps) with slow cadence strength training (1 set of 3-7 reps at slow speed). I've been doing slow burn for nearly 6 months now and although I'm maintaining my condition, I'm not reducing inches any longer.

What do you all think?


Periodization is manipulating training variables in a way that optimizes your results. It applies to training as well as diet. It is different than just randomly changing your workouts.

To answer your question, absolutely it is better to alter your program. No single program is going to be vastly superior for any appreciable amount of time. In fact, since you've been training slowly, I would discard slow tempo resistance training altogether for at least a few months. Introduce some new training stimulus to your routine.

In terms of a routine, you have to look at your goals, equipment availability, lifting experience and most importantly - individual posture and biomechanics. It wouldn't be a bad idea to hire a trainer for a couple of sessions to establish this - one who does movement screens and postural assessments.

And while there is no single program that is vastly superior to any other - free weights, body weight and cable exercises should make up the vast majority of any program. If you have been on machines, you may need to rehabilitate your movement mechanics a bit as they will be comprimised by doing exercises on machines.

Hope that helps. If you have any other questions, please ask.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 22:15.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.