Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Sun, Oct-16-22, 03:46
JEY100's Avatar
JEY100 JEY100 is online now
Posts: 13,433
 
Plan: P:E/DDF
Stats: 225/150/169 Female 5' 9"
BF:45%/28%/25%
Progress: 134%
Location: NC
Default FDA says at least 7cereals have no nutritional value

Depending on the news source, this announcement from the FDA, which is now open to comment, points out the obvious about high sugar sugar cereals…they are not Nutritious. Raisin Bran, Honey Nut Cheerios, Corn Flakes, Honey Bunches of Oats, Frosted Mini Wheats, and Special K no longer qualify as healthy under the agency's new definition, CNBC reports.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/11/fda...ot-qualify.html

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/nu...lue/ar-AA12VR0s

FDA Says These Cereals Are No Longer Healthy
Considered to once be a healthy option for breakfast, the FDA now says, nope.
The Street: https://www.thestreet.com/investing...t-general-mills

Last edited by JEY100 : Sun, Oct-16-22 at 05:12.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Sun, Oct-16-22, 05:21
Dodger's Avatar
Dodger Dodger is offline
Posts: 8,764
 
Plan: Paleoish/Keto
Stats: 225/167/175 Male 71.5 inches
BF:18%
Progress: 116%
Location: Longmont, Colorado
Default

They were never healthy even with yucky low-fat milk!
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Sun, Oct-16-22, 06:13
Ms Arielle's Avatar
Ms Arielle Ms Arielle is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 19,219
 
Plan: atkins, carnivore 2023
Stats: 200/211/163 Female 5'8"
BF:
Progress: -30%
Location: Massachusetts
Default

Wow!!!!

Thank goodness for DANDR as with that information 20 years ago I was able to get my young kids off that junk.

Until I found a bag of sugar coated mini wheats in my son's shirt draw yesterday. A HUGE bag, like 2 gal size!!!! Where did I go wrong.....oh wait, they are teenagers!!!
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Sun, Oct-16-22, 07:35
deirdra's Avatar
deirdra deirdra is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 4,328
 
Plan: vLC/GF,CF,SF
Stats: 197/136/150 Female 66 inches
BF:
Progress: 130%
Location: Alberta
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dodger
They were never healthy even with yucky low-fat milk!
and their "fortification" with vitamins & minerals. It would probably be healthier to eat the box and pop a daily vitamin/mineral supplement.

If Corn Flakes & Special K make the list with half to 1/3 the amount of sugar as some of the others on the list, there must be a lot more than 7 that have been or should be stripped of their labels, like "Heart Healthy" Froot Loops. The statement from the FDA implies that it is the public's fault for choosing unhealthy foods full of ingredients the government subsidizes, not the fault of the FDA, ADA etc. that put "healthy" on the labels.

Last edited by deirdra : Sun, Oct-16-22 at 07:45.
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Thu, Oct-20-22, 05:16
WereBear's Avatar
WereBear WereBear is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 14,675
 
Plan: EpiPaleo/Primal/LowOx
Stats: 220/130/150 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 129%
Location: USA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deirdra
The statement from the FDA implies that it is the public's fault for choosing unhealthy foods full of ingredients the government subsidizes, not the fault of the FDA, ADA etc. that put "healthy" on the labels.


Yes. Do YOUR job and we'll do ours.

But still, any progress against the Vegan Lobby is progress. Which is kind of how I now see the vast Corporate Machine that sees food and drugs as something we CONSUME like streaming television or cupholders in our vehicles.

When it is life itself.
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Fri, Oct-21-22, 08:31
Calianna's Avatar
Calianna Calianna is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,891
 
Plan: Atkins-ish (hypoglycemia)
Stats: 000/000/000 Female 63
BF:
Progress: 50%
Default

Take note of the fact that it's not just the sugar content that relegates those cereals to "unhealthy" status:

Quote:
The agency used cereal as an example to detail the new criteria.

For a healthy stamp from the FDA, cereals have to contain three-fourth ounces of whole grains, and no more than 1 gram of saturated fat, 230 milligrams of sodium and 2.5 grams of added sugars.


To qualify for the healthy status, a cereal needs to meet ALL of those criteria.

Most of those cereals fit the criteria for required whole grains, and limited sat fat.

The sweet ones ended up on that list because of their added sugar content, but Corn Flakes and Special K also ended up on that list because of the sodium content, which for dry cereal needs to be under 240mg/serving - corn flakes has 300mg sodium/serving, Special K has 270mg sodium/serving.

Not sure how they'll "fix" that to get back on the healthy list, since you know they're going to do whatever it takes. They could probably get away with replacing some of the sodium with potassium chloride though since KCl has a salty (but bitter) flavor.

They're going to need to play with the sweeteners in order to get back under the 2/5mg added sugars too, so perhaps they'll just switch to enough artificial sweeteners make it slightly sweeter to help counteract the bitterness of the KCl.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 16:22.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.