Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Tue, Dec-28-21, 07:40
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 26,729
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/153/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 109%
Location: UK
Default Easy access to junk food thwarts obesity efforts

Quote:
Easy access to junk food thwarts obesity efforts

A crackdown on junk food will struggle to reduce obesity because of the “ubiquity and desirability” of unhealthy options, experts have warned.

Easy access to junk food 24 hours a day makes losing weight difficult for millions of people, according to a review commissioned by the National Institute for Health Research, which advises ministers.

The Department of Health and Social Care has announced compulsory calorie labelling in large food outlets, a 9pm curfew for television adverts for foods high in fat, salt and sugar and restrictions on store and online promotions for unhealthy foods.

The new review by the Centre for Food Policy at City University found that it could be almost impossible for people to stick to their diets.

“Fast-food marketing and advertising was seen as pervasive and a real challenge to controlling weight, as it made less nutritious options very tempting,” the review found. “Fast-food options were also easier to access, as they were more likely than healthier options to be located close to homes and workplaces.”

The review of research from 2010 to 2020 comes after Britain was classed as the heaviest nation in western Europe, with almost two thirds of the adult population overweight.

It said: “People engaging in weight management reported eating more, simply because food was always easily available and this close and constant exposure triggered them to want food more often.

“People also reported that being met everywhere with promotions made it very difficult not to think about food or make unplanned purchases of foods high in fat, salt and sugar.

“Fast-food marketing and advertising was seen as pervasive and a real challenge to controlling weight, as it made less nutritious options very tempting.” It said the relative cheapness of unhealthy food, which was more likely to be promoted in shops, made weight loss particularly hard for people on a low income.

The review said: “Efforts to manage weight were consistently undermined by the ubiquity and desirability of high in fat, salt and sugar options, particularly in the workplace and where the numbers of fast-food outlets were high.”

It report found that social occasions that centred on food “often involved eating foods or amounts that were not planned or desired in order to meet other people’s expectations”.

Kimberley Neve, a researcher at the NIHR and the lead author of the review, said the government did not need to become the “nanny state” but must ensure there was a wider range of options to allow people to eat healthily.

“It should be about making healthier food easier to find and to buy,” she said. “The growth in fast-food online delivery apps during the Covid restrictions has increased availability to fast food.”

Caroline Cerny, of the Obesity Health Alliance, told The Guardian: “The UK’s health problems reflect an environment that is flooded with unhealthy food and drinks.”

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...forts-d0v0p8qf6


Quote:
UK obesity plan will fail without action on unhealthy food – report

Exclusive: Centre for Food Policy says efforts to lose weight are being thwarted by constant exposure in retail and advertising


Ministers have been warned that their efforts to tackle Britain’s obesity crisis are likely to fail because the public are constantly “bombarded” by unhealthy food options.

Britain has one of the highest obesity rates in Europe, with two in three adults overweight or obese and the NHS spending £6bn a year treating obesity-related ill-health, a figure that is forecast to rise to £10bn a year by 2050. The government has announced plans to introduce a 9pm watershed on TV and a ban on paid-for advertising online for unhealthy food and drink, plus new restrictions on the promotion of unhealthy food and drink in retail outlets and online.

However, a damning 28-page report, commissioned by the government’s own obesity research unit and seen by the Guardian, warns that these efforts will fail unless much wider action is urgently taken to transform the entire food environment.

The review, by the Centre for Food Policy at London’s City University, found that easy access to and availability of unhealthy food 24 hours a day across the UK makes losing weight “difficult” for millions of people who are trying. “People engaging in weight management reported eating more, simply because food was always easily available and this close and constant exposure triggered them to want food more often,” the review found.

“People also reported that being met everywhere with promotions made it very difficult not to think about food or make unplanned purchases of HFSS [high in fat, salt or sugar] food.”

Even Britons who are “trying really hard” to lose weight are being “thwarted in their efforts” because of the amount of unhealthy food they encounter each day. City University’s experts undertook the review for the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) obesity policy research unit, which commissions independent research to inform ministers.

The review concludes that even well-designed weight management services will only have a “limited impact” on Britain’s long-term efforts to promote and maintain weight loss if ministers fail to improve the food environment at the same time.

Kimberley Neve, the lead author of the review, said: “This review highlights not only how difficult it is to lose weight in Britain, and keep it off, but also that it’s not just about willpower or self-control: even people trying really hard are thwarted in their efforts by unhealthy food options that are everywhere – they’re easy to find, cheap to buy, quick and appealing.”

The review found that the relatively lower cost of unhealthy food options made weight management “particularly difficult” for people on a low income, with unhealthy food more likely to be promoted and on offer in shops and supermarkets.

“With Christmas treats in abundance in the supermarkets, and new year resolutions around the corner, the narrative needs to shift so that instead of going on the usual January diet, people ask for a food environment that supports them to be healthy,” said Neve, a research assistant for the food systems and policy analysis workstream of the NIHR Obesity Policy Research Unit at City University’s Centre for Food Policy. “For that, you need policy to level the playing field for industry to start making changes.”

Experts not involved with the review said its findings were incredibly stark.

Jane DeVille-Almond, the chair of the British Obesity Society, said: “Pretty much every activity we encounter, outside our homes today, involves our senses being bombarded with food aromas. The sad fact is many of these foods are considered bad food choices, especially if we are trying to lose weight or eat more healthily.”

Britain must “steer changes” in the food environment if it is to become healthier, she said. “Cinemas, leisure and activity centres, hospitals, work spaces, supermarkets and food outlets all need to work on offering and promoting tasty healthier choices.”

Caroline Cerny, the alliance lead at the Obesity Health Alliance (OHA), said the review showed Britain’s obesity crisis was “far less a problem of individual behaviour and lack of willpower” and “far more about the environments around us”. She added: “The UK’s health problems reflect an environment that is flooded with unhealthy food and drinks.”

A separate report by the OHA published earlier this year said Britons are exposed to an “obesogenic environment” from birth, “one in which calorie-dense, nutrient-poor food is accessible, abundant, affordable and normalised and where physical activity opportunities are not built into everyday life.”

The new review found that people often come up with diet plans, but shops, supermarkets, advertising on public transport and workplaces can make it almost impossible for them to stick to their routine.

“The ubiquity and appeal of unhealthy foods means that people actively trying to lose weight or keep it off must avoid parts of the food environment – a certain aisle in the supermarket, the work canteen or a friend’s party – to be able to adhere to healthy eating plans,” it said.

“Government attempts to address this with new restrictions on junk food marketing in 2022 are a positive first step,” said Cerny. “But we need much more, including levies on the food industry to incentivise them to produce healthier products.”

Ministers are being urged to accept seven policy recommendations. These include shifting the balance in the UK food environment so there are more discounts on healthier foods such as fruit and vegetables. Businesses should also be helped “to provide healthier options in the workplace” for employees, and fast food outlets should be incentivised to sell healthy options, the review urges.

Tam Fry, the chair of the National Obesity Forum, said similar measures were urged a decade ago, but ministers failed to act. “The government’s responsibility deal launched in 2011 was an attempt to tackle all the issues around HFSS food and was accepted by food companies as long as it was free from regulation. The government declined to legislate and the deal unravelled. The researchers’ demands must now be mandated – no ifs and no buts.”

A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: “As part of our obesity strategy to get the nation fit and healthy, we are introducing mandatory calorie labelling in large restaurants, cafes and takeaways, restricting advertising of foods high in fat, salt and sugar being shown on TV before 9pm and in paid-for advertising online, as well as restricting less healthy food promotions in stores and online.

“Additionally we have invested £70m into adult weight management services made available through the NHS and councils, so that people living with obesity have access to support that can help them to lose weight.

“The Office for Health Improvement and Disparities will build on our national efforts to tackle obesity, improve mental health and promote physical activity.”

https://www.theguardian.com/society...ironment-report
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Tue, Dec-28-21, 07:57
bkloots's Avatar
bkloots bkloots is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 10,150
 
Plan: LC--Atkins
Stats: 195/162/150 Female 62in
BF:
Progress: 73%
Location: Kansas City, MO
Default

Quote:
promotions made it very difficult not to think about food or make unplanned purchases of foods high in fat, salt and sugar.
Just wait until people (UK and US alike) find out how difficult it is to manage diabetes, heart, and blood pressure medication, get in and out of vehicles and other seats, carry shopping bags, climb stairs....etc. The government will not help those problems with informative food labels.

I simply do not understand why personal responsibility for one's own health and happiness must inevitably be overwhelmed by environmental or social pressure. If that were the case, every free soul on the planet with access would be vaccinated against covid-19. Millions (in the US) seem to have a super-power of resistance to that particular pressure. Sigh.

As we've often advised on this forum: shop around the edges of your grocery store. Don't bring anything into your home that isn't in your plan. What is this "unplanned"??? Planned or not, reaching for the junk food is, in the moment, a personal choice. Just say no...no...no....YES to something else.

It's your life.

Last edited by bkloots : Tue, Dec-28-21 at 08:12.
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Tue, Dec-28-21, 08:56
JEY100's Avatar
JEY100 JEY100 is offline
Posts: 13,431
 
Plan: P:E/DDF
Stats: 225/150/169 Female 5' 9"
BF:45%/28%/25%
Progress: 134%
Location: NC
Default

And from the US, this recent Newsweek article:

TOXIC FOOD: Americans Are Addicted to 'Ultra-Processed' Foods, and It's Killing Us

https://www.newsweek.com/2021/12/17...us-1656977.html

Quote:
Being severely overweight has never been so dangerous. During the COVID-19 epidemic, Americans who are obese, without any other risk factors, were hospitalized at three times the rate of those who weren't, by some estimates. When combined with other diet-related health conditions such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes, obesity raises the risk of hospitalization sixfold and the risk of death twelvefold.

Those numbers have raised the stakes in the nation's epidemic of diet-related disease and added to the growing alarm of politicians and nutrition experts, some of whom are starting to call upon regulators to rein in food companies. They're pushing measures similar to those used to curb the influence of tobacco companies in the 1990s, such as limiting the marketing of certain kinds of food to children and actively discouraging the consumption of key ingredients—chief among them, sugar.

At issue is the explosive growth in a broad class of food products that are not merely processed in the conventional sense to lengthen shelf life, but are also often modified to maximize flavor, visual appeal, texture, odor and the speed with which they are digested. These foods are made by deconstructing natural food into its chemical constituents, modifying them and recombining them into new forms that bear little resemblance to anything found in nature. So radically are they altered that nutrition scientists have given them a new name: ultra-processed.
Continues in article....
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Tue, Dec-28-21, 11:23
GRB5111's Avatar
GRB5111 GRB5111 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 4,042
 
Plan: Very LC, Higher Protein
Stats: 227/186/185 Male 6' 0"
BF:
Progress: 98%
Location: Herndon, VA
Default

The two articles posted by Demi read like a Jonathan Swift novel. The only terms missing are the Yahoos and the Houyhnhnms. The verbiage is classic government-speak. Clearly, food manufacturers are marketing to the Yahoos and winning many sales. Despite irresistible aromas wafting in the ether, there are those who both understand how to eat in a healthy way and are able to resist the constant bombardment of food messages raining on the public. Removing food ads after 9pm? Some stop eating after 6:30pm and are not seduced by these messages. I only wish the U.S. government would ban prescription commercials at all times, but that's unlikely to happen. When do we think that we'll start relying on people to make their own health decisions? Possibly when reliable and factual health information is available? Tobacco was excoriated on the health front and look what happened. Sugar, and those foods that convert to sugar along with the manufactured seed oils should be candidates for that, but oh wait, it's too lucrative for the media to stop showing these ads, because what's a little extra fat for the populace when a business is booming??? We know it's okay when it's done in moderation . . .

Beyond belief, but it's the world in which we live.

Last edited by GRB5111 : Tue, Dec-28-21 at 12:43.
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Sat, Jan-08-22, 12:45
Dalesbred's Avatar
Dalesbred Dalesbred is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 164
 
Plan: IF/Keto/80:20
Stats: 162/150/142 Female 5 feet 6 inches
BF:
Progress: 60%
Location: Wetherby, Yorkshire, UK
Default

It’s the constant snacking and eating, and encouragement to do the same. Why would you need to eat in the cinema (sneaky glass of wine to sip, OK) but the buckets of popcorn? All about profit I guess. Keeping people on a high carb diet keeps them hungry, on a low carb diet you are rarely hungry. And what could they serve in the cinema to an audience with a healthy appetite? Nuts, jerky, celery sticks, cheese? It just wouldn’t work, no thanks, I’m not hungry.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 22:02.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.