Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Fri, Jul-29-22, 08:28
Nancy LC's Avatar
Nancy LC Nancy LC is offline
Experimenter
Posts: 25,865
 
Plan: DDF
Stats: 202/185.4/179 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 72%
Location: San Diego, CA
Default What if the focus on calories is wrong?

What if the focus on calories is wrong?

Hardly ever seen anything like this in the WaPo.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Fri, Jul-29-22, 08:42
JEY100's Avatar
JEY100 JEY100 is offline
Posts: 13,440
 
Plan: P:E/DDF
Stats: 225/150/169 Female 5' 9"
BF:45%/28%/25%
Progress: 134%
Location: NC
Default

Only because it is an Opinion piece?
Hard to deny Harvard expert Dr David Ludwig his say
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Fri, Jul-29-22, 09:43
Nancy LC's Avatar
Nancy LC Nancy LC is offline
Experimenter
Posts: 25,865
 
Plan: DDF
Stats: 202/185.4/179 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 72%
Location: San Diego, CA
Default

True, but even so!
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Fri, Jul-29-22, 09:48
Ms Arielle's Avatar
Ms Arielle Ms Arielle is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 19,232
 
Plan: atkins, carnivore 2023
Stats: 200/211/163 Female 5'8"
BF:
Progress: -30%
Location: Massachusetts
Default

Dr Fung has addressed how the body compensates for low caloric in take. Calories in v calories out is a static model. The metabolic body is adaptive.

As for an opinion price, perhaps that area of the WaPo is more popular than printing that same article in the science or medicine section.
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Tue, Aug-02-22, 04:30
WereBear's Avatar
WereBear WereBear is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 14,684
 
Plan: EpiPaleo/Primal/LowOx
Stats: 220/130/150 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 129%
Location: USA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ms Arielle
As for an opinion price, perhaps that area of the WaPo is more popular than printing that same article in the science or medicine section.


I forget how old I was when I thought "controversial" meant "they are telling the truth and upsetting people" but that definition still holds.
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Thu, Aug-04-22, 11:47
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 26,755
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/153/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 109%
Location: UK
Default

Quote:
When Scientific Paradigms Collide

What if overeating doesn’t make you fat?


This post expands upon, and was modified from, an opinion article in The Washington Post


https://davidludwigmd.medium.com/wh...de-360b5408a066
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 21:49.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.