Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Mark Forums Read Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Fri, Jun-21-19, 01:43
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 26,729
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/153/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 109%
Location: UK
Default Low-carb diet may reduce diabetes risk independent of weight loss

Quote:
From Science Daily
June 20, 2019

Low-carb diet may reduce diabetes risk independent of weight loss

Researchers report reversal of metabolic syndrome in some cases


A low-carb diet may have benefits for people at risk of developing type 2 diabetes even if they don't lose any weight, a new study suggests.

Researchers at The Ohio State University wanted to know what happens to obese people with metabolic syndrome, a precursor to diabetes, when they eat a diet low in carbohydrates but don't shed any pounds. They found that more than half of study participants no longer met the criteria for metabolic syndrome immediately following a four-week low-carb diet.

The new study included 16 men and women with metabolic syndrome, a cluster of factors that also put people at higher risk of heart disease and stroke. The conditions that contribute to metabolic syndrome include high blood pressure, high blood sugar, excess body fat around the waist and abnormally low 'good' HDL cholesterol or high triglyceride levels. About a third of American adults have the syndrome, according to the American Heart Association.

After eating a low-carb diet, more than half the participants -- five men and four women -- saw their metabolic syndrome reversed even though they were fed diets that intentionally contained enough calories to keep their weight stable.

Previous work in the Ohio State lab and elsewhere has shown that low-carb diets can be beneficial for people with metabolic syndrome and diabetes, but nutrition scientists and others have debated whether that's a product of the diet or a product of the weight loss typically seen when people reduce carbs, said the study's senior author, Jeff Volek, a professor of human sciences at Ohio State.

"There's no doubt that people with metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes do better on low-carb diets, but they typically lose weight and one of the prevailing thoughts is that the weight loss is driving the improvements. That was clearly not the case here," Volek said.

"Our view is that restricting carbs even without weight loss improves a host of metabolic problems. Obviously, quality of diet matters because quantity is locked down in this experiment."

The study appears today (June 20) in the Journal of Clinical Investigation Insight.

Over about four months, each study participant ate three month-long controlled diets -- high-carb, moderate-carb and low-carb -- with a two-week break between diets. The order in which the participants ate the diets was randomly assigned.

The research team, led by research scientist Parker Hyde, ensured that the participants would not lose weight by providing them with pre-prepared meals that contained an amount of calories equal to their energy expenditure.

After eating the low-carb diet, the participants had a variety of significantly improved health measures, particularly lower triglycerides and improved cholesterol readings. Despite the fact that the low-carb diet contained 2.5 times more saturated fat than the high-carb diet, it decreased saturated fat in the bloodstream and was associated with an increase in the size of cholesterol particles in the blood, which decreases the risk of cardiovascular disease, Hyde said.

The researchers also report evidence of increased fat-burning efficiency after a low-carb diet and an improvement in blood sugar. They did not see statistically significant improvements in blood pressure or insulin resistance.

Three participants no longer had metabolic syndrome after the moderate-carbohydrate diet and one no longer had the syndrome after the high-carb diet. Volek said that those results are likely explained by the fact that even these study diets -- particularly the moderate-carb diet -- represented a shift toward fewer carbs for study participants.

"Even a modest restriction is carbs is enough to reverse metabolic syndrome in some people, but others need to restrict even more," he said.

Because of the study design, waist circumference was not factored in as a contributor to metabolic syndrome. Had the participants been permitted to lose weight, it is likely that several more would have been considered free of the condition after the low-carb diet, Volek said.

This research doesn't address the potential long-term benefits and challenges of adopting a low-carbohydrate diet, and the researchers suggest that future long-term diet studies on people with metabolic syndrome need to include low-carb diets.

The research was supported by the National Dairy Council and the Dutch Dairy Association.


Journal Reference:
Parker N. Hyde, Teryn N. Sapper, Christopher D. Crabtree, Richard A. LaFountain, Madison L. Bowling, Alex Buga, Brandon Fell, Fionn T. McSwiney, Ryan M. Dickerson, Vincent J. Miller, Debbie Scandling, Orlando P. Simonetti, Stephen D. Phinney, William J. Kraemer, Sarah A. King, Ronald M. Krauss, Jeff S. Volek. Dietary carbohydrate restriction improves metabolic syndrome independent of weight loss. JCI Insight, 2019; 4 (12) DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.128308



https://www.sciencedaily.com/releas...90620100036.htm
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Fri, Jun-21-19, 04:47
Dodger's Avatar
Dodger Dodger is offline
Posts: 8,764
 
Plan: Paleoish/Keto
Stats: 225/167/175 Male 71.5 inches
BF:18%
Progress: 116%
Location: Longmont, Colorado
Default

I'm not surprised at all by the results. If each diet I lasted longer than a month, there would have been more reversal of metabolic syndrome.
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Fri, Jun-21-19, 10:21
CityGirl8 CityGirl8 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 856
 
Plan: Protein Power, IF
Stats: 238/204/145 Female 5'8"
BF:53.75%/46.6%/25%
Progress: 37%
Location: PNW
Default

I feel like the whole study was Phinney and Volek saying "Oh for Pete's sake!! Fine. We will prove to you that it's lower carbs that are making a difference. Now STFU."
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Fri, Jun-21-19, 11:01
HappyLC HappyLC is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,876
 
Plan: Generic low carb
Stats: 212/167/135 Female 66.75
BF:
Progress: 58%
Location: Long Island, NY
Default

Quote:
They did not see statistically significant improvements in...insulin resistance.


I don't understand how you can reduce diabetes risk without fixing insulin resistance.
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Sat, Jun-22-19, 09:09
CityGirl8 CityGirl8 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 856
 
Plan: Protein Power, IF
Stats: 238/204/145 Female 5'8"
BF:53.75%/46.6%/25%
Progress: 37%
Location: PNW
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyLC
I don't understand how you can reduce diabetes risk without fixing insulin resistance.
I assume that in addition to testing fasting glucose--which is what they use to diagnose pre-diabetes--that they tested some other markers like fasting insulin or a post-prandial glucose. Those tests would give some indication of insulin resistance--how much insulin your body pumps out in response to food. It sounds like over the four weeks of the study that people probably had drops in their fasting glucose, but not significant changes in their fasting insulin or post-prandial glucose.

The study is saying that fasting glucose numbers in a certain range are a risk factor for diabetes and over the four weeks they lowered that particular risk factor.

Four weeks isn't very long, and I would expect it to take longer than that to repair underlying metabolic damage.
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Sun, Jun-23-19, 07:05
WereBear's Avatar
WereBear WereBear is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 14,674
 
Plan: EpiPaleo/Primal/LowOx
Stats: 220/130/150 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 129%
Location: USA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CityGirl8
I feel like the whole study was Phinney and Volek saying "Oh for Pete's sake!! Fine. We will prove to you that it's lower carbs that are making a difference. Now STFU."


In their "Science for Dummies" series
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Sun, Jun-23-19, 08:10
teaser's Avatar
teaser teaser is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 15,075
 
Plan: mostly milkfat
Stats: 190/152.4/154 Male 67inches
BF:
Progress: 104%
Location: Ontario
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyLC
I don't understand how you can reduce diabetes risk without fixing insulin resistance.



Quote:
Researchers at The Ohio State University wanted to know what happens to obese people with metabolic syndrome, a precursor to diabetes, when they eat a diet low in carbohydrates but don't shed any pounds. They found that more than half of study participants no longer met the criteria for metabolic syndrome immediately following a four-week low-carb diet.


They're just looking at metabolic syndrome generally as a risk factor for developing diabetes. So that while, individually, hdl cholesterol, triglycerides, high blood pressure, diagnostic criteria for metabolic syndrome are not directly glucose/insulin related, (not that indirectly either), together they're seen as a risk.

But certainly glucose and insulin are more obviously risk, they're practically the disease itself. I do think this shows that low carb improves things whether there's weight loss or not--but leaving out weight loss leaves a good deal of improvement on the table.

The argument that you have to lose weight to benefit looks worse for the low fat group than the low carb group, here.
Reply With Quote
  #8   ^
Old Sun, Jun-23-19, 08:22
GRB5111's Avatar
GRB5111 GRB5111 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 4,042
 
Plan: Very LC, Higher Protein
Stats: 227/186/185 Male 6' 0"
BF:
Progress: 98%
Location: Herndon, VA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by teaser
The argument that you have to lose weight to benefit looks worse for the low fat group than the low carb group, here.

Yes, the low fat group made no impression here. Isolating for weight alone as a precursor to diabetes has always been the belief of all ADA directed programs and supported by the broader medical community. This study eliminates the tendency to have an "easy button" for assigning root cause to one or two conditions.
Reply With Quote
  #9   ^
Old Sun, Jun-23-19, 08:28
Bob-a-rama's Avatar
Bob-a-rama Bob-a-rama is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,961
 
Plan: Keto (Atkins Induction)
Stats: 235/175/185 Male 5' 11"
BF:
Progress: 120%
Location: Florida
Default

Duh! Type 2 Diabetes is sugar/insulin related. My father had type2 and the doc said "no sugar and no refined carbs".

No sugar or high glycemic foods, and low need for insulin.

Type 1 diabetics need to keep their insulin needs low, and eating minimal carbs does just that.

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #10   ^
Old Sun, Jun-23-19, 08:57
Dodger's Avatar
Dodger Dodger is offline
Posts: 8,764
 
Plan: Paleoish/Keto
Stats: 225/167/175 Male 71.5 inches
BF:18%
Progress: 116%
Location: Longmont, Colorado
Default

It must have been difficult to keep those on the low-carb diet from losing weight. When I started low-carbing, I ate until I was no longer hungry every meal and still kept losing weight. I would have had to stuff myself to not lose any weight.
Reply With Quote
  #11   ^
Old Mon, Jun-24-19, 07:34
Bob-a-rama's Avatar
Bob-a-rama Bob-a-rama is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,961
 
Plan: Keto (Atkins Induction)
Stats: 235/175/185 Male 5' 11"
BF:
Progress: 120%
Location: Florida
Default

I have to watch my caloric intake. I need under 2k/day or else I gain. Everybody is different.

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #12   ^
Old Mon, Jun-24-19, 17:02
Ms Arielle's Avatar
Ms Arielle Ms Arielle is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 19,217
 
Plan: atkins, carnivore 2023
Stats: 200/211/163 Female 5'8"
BF:
Progress: -30%
Location: Massachusetts
Default

Wo nder what the carb levels were for the high, med, and low carb levels?

Dr. Atkins said a person must get off low carb for a few days to take the glucose test to get accurate picture....Im confused. Maybe not?? Or different test?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 17:28.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.