Quote:
Originally Posted by watcher16
I do this for 1 1/2 year now, and still like it very much.
In some info I picked up that training a muscle should be followed by day's of rest. Maybe up to ten day's maybe even more!
Has anybody experience with these large in-between periods?
|
That is the mind set among today's bodybuilding circles.
In lieu of a very lengthy discussion, let me just say that IMO, it is neither true nor false, but rather contingent on the type of training you are doing. Also IMO, the kind of training that necessitates these long rest periods is not the best way to train in a functional since.
I believe that a person would experience better gains by training with heavier percentages of their 1RM (75%+), avoid training to failure, doing forced reps, supersets etc. and instead train more often. The idea behind this is neural training rather than neural breakdown/damage. As Pavel Tsatsouline puts it, ‘Grease the Groove.” He has a great book on this subject called ‘Power to the People.’
I train myself this way (used to train the other way
) and everyone else that solicits my help, rather it be my friends, people in the gym, or other. To date, I have not heard a single person complain about the progress they have made or the method of training. The only naysayers are the ones that are to close-minded to even give it an honest run.
Some will tell you that is kind of training is only good for strength gains and while that is true, that is not all. It is the only way, or at the very least, the best way to train to increase myofibril hypertrophy (increased muscle density by increased number of fibers), which is the true definition of muscle tone. If increased size is what you are after, it can be achieved by higher volume (e.g. 10-20 sets/exercise) training.
I’m no doctor or scientist, but this is what I know to be true.
Siff, Staley, Zatsiorsky and Verkoshansky, to name a few, may be able to offer you more proof on this, for lack of a better term, theory.