Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Daily Low-Carb Support > General Low-Carb
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Sat, May-19-01, 10:15
doreen T's Avatar
doreen T doreen T is offline
Forum Founder
Posts: 37,231
 
Plan: LC, GF
Stats: 241/188/140 Female 165 cm
BF:
Progress: 52%
Location: Eastern ON, Canada
Post SUGAR ALCOHOLS (maltitol, etc) ... Essay

ABOUT SUGAR ALCOHOLS (MALTITOL, SORBITOL, DARNITOL , etc..)

These sweeteners are neither sugars, nor alcohols, but they are carbohydrates nonetheless. They are sometimes called POLYOLS, to avoid confusion. At the present time, they have not been legally classified for product labelling purposes, as are sugars, starch and fiber. So, some manufacturers are choosing to omit them from the total carb count in the nutrient data panel of the label (they MUST however declare the amount of sugar alcohol in the ingredient list). Because they aren't actually SUGAR, products that contain them may use the term "sugar free" on the label. Some manufacturers and distributors (esp. in Canada and Europe) are choosing to declare the full carbs in the nutrient data panel, and national diabetes associations are pressuring for gov't legislation to make this a legal requirement.

There are some claims that sugar alcohols don't have carbs, and therefore don't count; that they can be completely subtracted if listed on the label. This statement is not entirely "false" but it is misleading. Sugar alcohols do have carbs, and approx. 1/2 to 3/4 the calories of regular sugar. They are more slowly and incompletely absorbed from the small intestine than sugar, thus producing a much smaller and slower rise in blood sugar ... and consequently insulin. But this is a YMMV thing. Some Type 1 diabetics have reported that they sense an immediate "sugar rush" from eating even a small amount. Others notice no change, and absolutely no effect on ketosis.

Sugar alcohols do have carb calories, and the body will use these as fuel, or store as fat, whether or not insulin is involved. You need to look at the total CALORIES for one serving of the product. Subtract from this total the number of calories from any protein in the product (prot = 4 cal. per gm), then subtract the calories from any FAT in the product (fat = 9 cal. per gm). What's left is the calories from carbohydrate ... divide this remainder by 4 (carbs = 4 cal. per gm). If the number you get is bigger than the number of carbs declared on the label, the product has hidden carbs, and it's most likely the polyol. Calories do not just disappear into thin air!

The "laxative effect" happens for two reasons. First, because the sugar alcohols are not completely absorbed, they hold on to a lot of water in the bowel. This causes diarrhea. Another consequence is that when undigested carbs reach the colon, the normal bacteria present there go WILD --- resulting in unpleasant gas, and bloating. Sorbitol and mannitol are the worst offenders in this department, maltitol less so. The effect is dose-related -- you would be wise to pay attention to the serving size listed on the product label. This amount would be considered "safe" for the average adult -- make note of this before giving to a smaller child! Nothing like watching your kid doubled over with cramps and diarrhea because they ate too many "sugar free" sweets. To the best of my knowledge, sugar alcohols ARE safe for children, and pregnant/nursing mothers ... just keep an eye on the dose.

There are some newer sugar alcohols slowly making their way on the market, which have less laxative effect, and even less blood sugar and insulin consequence. Erythritol and inulin are two to watch for. There's another called HSH (hydrolyzed starch hydrolysate) also called maltitol syrup. The thing is, the different sugar alcohols have different properties, and can't be used for all things. Sorbitol is used in hard candies ... it produces a nice, clear candy that doesn't crystalize, and stays hard and dry in a humid environment. Because it doesn't crystalize, sorbitol is used in ice cream to help it stay creamy. Mannitol also can absorb a lot of moisture before it gets damp and sticky, therefore it's used to "dust" sticks of gum, to keep them dry. Maltitol and erythritol provide smooth bulk, and are ideal for chocolates and soft candies to give a creamy "melt in the mouth" quality.

Sugar alcohols are not acted upon by bacteria in the mouth, and therefore do NOT cause tooth decay. In fact, xylitol actually INHIBITS oral bacteria, and is often used in sugarless mints and chewing gum for this reason.

BOTTOM LINE

We are all individuals, and our bodies will react differently to these products. Depending on other factors, such as what else we've consumed along with it or on an empty stomach, we may even find ourselves having totally different reactions each time we eat it. So proceed with caution.

Be aware that there is potential to cause a rise in blood sugar and insulin ... although slower. Also the possibility to knock you out of ketosis, if you're following a ketogenic program such as Atkins. Pay attention to the serving SIZE. A 45-gram (1-1/2 oz) chocolate bar may state on the label that one serving is 15 grams (1/2 oz). That's only 1/3 of the bar, so keep that in mind when you're about to chow down.

If you are following Induction level lowcarb eating, it would be wise to avoid these products until at LEAST the 2 weeks are up, and your body's metabolism is settled well into ketosis and fat-burning mode. Same for other lowcarb programs, which may not be ketogenic, but do have strong effects on the metabolism (eg. Protein Power, Carb Addicts). Give your body the chance to adjust to the new WOE first, then cautiously add these products.

KEYWORD moderation. Most lowcarbers find they can indulge very occasionally in a polyol-sweetened treat without consequence to their weight loss effort, and perhaps a mild laxative effect or some gas. It's a trade-off, but helps to stave off cravings for high-sugar goodies. A problem could develop though, for someone with carb-addiction .... these candies just become a substitute addiction. Also, the sweet taste can trigger EMOTIONS (for an addict) that will result in a "rush" of hormones and enzymes in the body, ultimately leading to an insulin spike ... and fat STORAGE. And remember that candy is NOT a meal substitute. There's little or no protein, vitamins or essential fatty acids ..

Doreen
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Sat, May-19-01, 10:35
wayner wayner is offline
New Member
Posts: 3
 
Plan:
Stats: //
BF:
Progress:
Location: Texas
Default Laxative effect :)

Hi Dorren

Thanks for the info... I have seen your name around here alot seems you got the know how on the subject. Speaking of the
laxative effect ever since I have been on the low carb have had that effect. Is this normal? I have not had any of the sugar alcohols to my knowledge.

Thanks Wayner
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Sat, May-19-01, 11:12
doreen T's Avatar
doreen T doreen T is offline
Forum Founder
Posts: 37,231
 
Plan: LC, GF
Stats: 241/188/140 Female 165 cm
BF:
Progress: 52%
Location: Eastern ON, Canada
Default

hi Wayner, welcome aboard ..

Um, this question has come up before ... there's some good information in another message thread on this forum, so I'll give you the link ... Click here to read it.

Hope the problem doesn't stick around, take care

Doreen
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Sat, May-19-01, 11:14
debbiedobson's Avatar
debbiedobson debbiedobson is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,127
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 162/162/135
BF:
Progress: 0%
Location: Toronto
Default

as usual doreen, you are a wealth of knowledge. thank-you for all the hard work and research that you do!
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Sat, May-19-01, 18:10
rainny's Avatar
rainny rainny is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 415
 
Plan: CKD
Stats: 245/215/130
BF:
Progress:
Location: Waller TX
Question

Thanks Doreen! You always know the right was to say everything! And I hope no one is doing what I did with the chocolate! Unless it is just to test their limits. I'm like testing limits...that was a personal test for me. Like I said before I don't react the same as other do to some things and visa versa. But I did need to see where my body stood with this product...and THANKFULY with me it was good.
Any ways Thanks again and good luck to all who try it!
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Fri, Dec-16-05, 17:10
jazzfan's Avatar
jazzfan jazzfan is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,313
 
Plan: Body For Life
Stats: 320/295/180 Female 67 inches
BF:too much thanks!
Progress: 18%
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Default

Help! I found a recipe I'm dying to try, but it calls for 1/4 C. of maltitol. Anybody know of an adequate substitute? There's also 1 C. of Splenda in the recipe - couldn't I just add more Splenda instead of maltitol? Just a question of how much then...

Thanks in advance!
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Fri, Dec-16-05, 17:27
kevinpa's Avatar
kevinpa kevinpa is offline
Kitchen Experimenter
Posts: 3,260
 
Plan: General LC Maintenance
Stats: 230/160/165 Male 70 inches
BF:way less now
Progress: 108%
Location: Pittsburgh
Default

One of the reasons manufacturer use maltitol plus splenda as opposed to straight splenda is that maltitol brings a texture to the recipe that splenda can not. Also maltitol alway seem to be in chocolate sweets. Ive only seen 2 substitutes replace it when made by a maufacturer: polyd and erythritol.
Reply With Quote
  #8   ^
Old Mon, Dec-19-05, 08:46
littlejohn's Avatar
littlejohn littlejohn is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 284
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 280/215/194 Male 6 feet 2 inches
BF:
Progress: 76%
Location: Texas
Default

Put me on the no more SAs for me list. I think the 3/4 of the carbs as sugar is about right for me. The digestive problems are not the main problem for me. They cause some cravings and stall (more like cause weight gain) me significantly.

If you can eat one a day or less you are ok. And I did that for quite a while. But it started getting out of control. General rule - processed food of any kind is bad news.
Reply With Quote
  #9   ^
Old Mon, Dec-19-05, 15:50
mskitty331 mskitty331 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 121
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 245/175/160 Female 5 feet 6 inches
BF:
Progress: 80%
Location: New Hampshire-USA
Unhappy sugar alcohols

Sugar alcohols are a killer for me. I get terrible cramping, on the toilet constantly, and makes me very gassy, especially the malitol, I guess being on the john all the time helps in losing weight LOL. I really have to read the labels before I buy any low carb chocolate, or even pancake syrup for that matter. I bought some of Steeles blueberry pancake syrup, didn't read the lable and had some and it was good but the after effects wasn't to pretty, it had Malitol in it. So now I have snacks that are like almonds, jello, I really have to read labels now.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trigger Of Insulin Resistance; Extra Sugar Can Cause Insulin Resistance in Cells IslandGirl LC Research/Media 7 Thu, Nov-18-04 21:54
"The Lowdown on Sweet" gotbeer LC Research/Media 8 Thu, May-20-04 07:51
"Coffee, Spices, Wine: New dietary ammo against diabetes?" gotbeer LC Research/Media 7 Tue, May-04-04 12:00
European sugar association claims tamarian LC Research/Media 0 Fri, Jun-01-01 10:57


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:53.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.