Mon, Jan-11-21, 05:20
|
 |
|
|
Plan: P:E/DDF
Stats: 225/150/169
BF:45%/28%/25%
Progress: 134%
Location: NC
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BawdyWench
Janet, I fully agree with you and others on the fact that some people can't do high-fat keto because the body will most likely burn the fat you eat (an easy process) rather than burn your body fat (a more complex process). I also find that I simply can't eat that much fat. When fat gets up to around 70% I start having trouble getting it all in without drinking melted butter.
Yesterday I tested my blood sugar when I woke up. It was 94. About an hour later I had about 5 oz of chicken breast with a Tablespoon of butter. An hour after that I tested again and it was 91. I took this to mean that the protein did not raise my blood sugar. Did I do that correctly? Was the timing right to get accurate results?
|
That's the way to test your reaction to foods, anywhere 1-2 hours after is OK. You can test anything if on its own...do artificial sweeteners raise your BG? Etc. Protein did not for you. But if if want to get fancy in a nerdy, geeky type of way,  consider Data Driven Fasting...where your own BG level BEFORE meals indicates if your "fuel tank" is empty.
https://optimisingnutrition.com/why...tabolic-health/
The Marty Kendall review of Taubes book above looks at the increased consumption of fats (mostly soybean oils) to the decreased consumption of carbs. ... where the "it’s all about carbs and sugar story" get rockier.
https://forum.lowcarber.org/showpos...7&postcount=125
Last edited by JEY100 : Mon, Jan-11-21 at 06:03.
|
Threaded Mode