Tue, Feb-05-19, 06:48
|
|
|
|
Plan: P:E/DDF
Stats: 225/150/169
BF:45%/28%/25%
Progress: 134%
Location: NC
|
|
Twitter has so many funny clever comments about this paper today, I can’t find my way back to the original question...but it is who did the peer review? And the answer from Lancet was...
From Nina Teicholz:
Quote:
Wow. Apparently peer review of EAT-Lancet paper was by its own authors. That's the best/worst story I've heard of 'peer review' yet! ~TheLancet Plus it seems they got some references wrong.
|
|