Quote:
Originally Posted by Dodger
People are being conned into thinking that real food is unhealthy and industrial foods are healthy.
|
This is so true - and it's been going on for a while, just getting worse over time.
The grocery store I worked for started adding "guiding stars" to shelf tags to promote healthy foods. Products only get stars if they meet certain nutritional criteria
based on the nutrition facts label, and then they get 1-3 stars, denoting good, better, best.
When I worked there, they were slowly working their way through rating center of store foods. I see that at this point, they're rating fresh produce, meats, seafood, and dairy.
Of course the rating depends on things like high fiber, low fat, low sodium, and lower amounts of added sugars.
Several flavored greek yogurts are getting 3 stars - because they're non-fat or low-fat and have fruit additions plus extras like kale and barley. I understand the full fat ones automatically failing their obvious fat-phobic criteria, but several plain greek yogurts with no junky additions get zero stars, and the only reason I can see for that is that they don't have fruit, vegetables or grains added to them.
For some foods, the ratings make sense - but the ratings are definitely biased against sodium, fats (particularly saturated fats), and cholesterol. It looks to me like added sugars are more likely to get a pass than fats. And apparently protein content doesn't count at all.
If you want to check out the crazy ratings some foods get - google for guiding stars shelf tags. That page will explain how their criteria for ratings work. Then you can bring up the food finder page and enter the name of a food in the search bar.
As an example of ridiculous ratings:
Ghirardelli 100% cocoa unsweetened cocoa powder gets 3 stars because it has no saturated fat.
But -
Ghirardelli unsweetened 100% cocoa powder only gets 2 stars because that version has 0.39g sat fat (even though it's still 0% RDA).
The two products are virtually identical, except for a slight difference in the name - and that tiny smidgen of sat fat that remains in the cocoa powder because it's not quite as processed as the one with no sat fat.
In many cases their ratings system actually pushes more highly processed foods - de-fatted, or more additions to "increase nutrition" (additions that you could easily add yourself).