Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Mark Forums Read Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Sat, Mar-09-19, 16:26
nawchem's Avatar
nawchem nawchem is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 8,701
 
Plan: No gluten, CAD
Stats: 196.0/158.5/149.0 Female 62
BF:36/29.0/27.3
Progress: 80%
Default Low-carb diets cause people to burn more calories

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releas...81114120302.htm

Date: November 14, 2018
Source: Boston Children's Hospital
Summary:
Most people regain the weight they lose from dieting within one or two years, in part because the body adapts by slowing metabolism and burning fewer calories. A meticulous study now finds that eating fewer carbohydrates increases the number of calories burned. The findings suggest that low-carb diets can help people maintain weight loss, making obesity treatment more effective.
Share:

FULL STORY
Most people regain the weight they lose from dieting within one or two years, in part because the body adapts by slowing metabolism and burning fewer calories. A meticulous study led by Boston Children's Hospital, in partnership with Framingham State University, now finds that eating fewer carbohydrates increases the number of calories burned. The findings, published November 14 in the BMJ, suggest that low-carb diets can help people maintain weight loss, making obesity treatment more effective.

The study, known as the Framingham State Food Study, or (FS)2, tightly controlled what people ate by providing them with fully prepared food-service meals for a 20-week period. Researchers carefully tracked participants' weight and measured insulin secretion, metabolic hormones and total energy expenditure (calories burned).

"This is the largest and longest feeding study to test the 'Carbohydrate-Insulin Model,' which provides a new way to think about and treat obesity," says David Ludwig, MD, PhD, who is co-principal investigator with Cara Ebbeling, PhD. (Ludwig and Ebbeling are co-directors of the New Balance Foundation Obesity Prevention Center in Boston Children's Division of Endocrinology.) "According to this model, the processed carbohydrates that flooded our diets during the low-fat era have raised insulin levels, driving fat cells to store excessive calories. With fewer calories available to the rest of the body, hunger increases and metabolism slows -- a recipe for weight gain."

Comparing carb levels head to head

After careful telephone screening of 1,685 potential participants, Ebbeling, Ludwig and colleagues enrolled 234 overweight adults (age 18 to 65, body mass index of 25 or higher) to an initial weight-loss diet for about 10 weeks. Of these, 164 achieved the goal of losing 10 to 14 percent of body weight and went on to the study's maintenance phase.

These participants were then randomized to follow high-, moderate- or low-carbohydrate diets for an additional 20 weeks -- with carbs comprising 60, 40 and 20 percent of total calories, respectively. Carbs provided to all three groups were of high quality, conforming to guidelines for minimizing sugar and using whole rather than highly processed grains.

In all three groups, total calorie intake was adjusted to maintain weight loss, so participants' weight did not change notably. During this phase, the goal was to compare energy expenditure -- how the different groups burned calories at the same weight. Energy expenditure was measured by a gold-standard method using doubly labeled water.

Over the 20 weeks, total energy expenditure was significantly greater on the low-carbohydrate diet versus the high-carbohydrate diet. At the same average body weight, participants who consumed the low-carb diet burned about 250 kilocalories a day more than those on the high-carb diet.

"If this difference persists -- and we saw no drop-off during the 20 weeks of our study -- the effect would translate into about a 20-pound weight loss after three years, with no change in calorie intake," says Ebbeling.

In people with the highest insulin secretion at baseline, the difference in calorie expenditure between the low- and high-carb diets was even greater, about 400 kilocalories per day, consistent with what the Carbohydrate-Insulin Model would predict. Ghrelin, a hormone thought to reduce calorie burning, was significantly lower on the low- versus high-carb diet.

"Our observations challenge the belief that all calories are the same to the body," says Ebbeling. "Our study did not measure hunger and satiety, but other studies suggest that low-carb diets also decrease hunger, which could help with weight loss in the long term."

Ludwig and Ebbeling recently launched another clinical trial called FB4, in which 125 adults with obesity live in a residential center for 13 weeks. Participants are being randomized to one of three diets: very-low-carb, high carb/low sugar or high carb/high sugar diets, with their calorie intakes individually matched to their energy expenditure. Results are expected in 2021.


Cara B Ebbeling, Henry A Feldman, Gloria L Klein, Julia M W Wong, Lisa Bielak, Sarah K Steltz, Patricia K Luoto, Robert R Wolfe, William W Wong, David S Ludwig. Effects of a low carbohydrate diet on energy expenditure during weight loss maintenance: randomized trial. BMJ, 2018; k4583 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k4583
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Sat, Mar-09-19, 17:26
JEY100's Avatar
JEY100 JEY100 is offline
Posts: 13,430
 
Plan: P:E/DDF
Stats: 225/150/169 Female 5' 9"
BF:45%/28%/25%
Progress: 134%
Location: NC
Default

This study received a large amount of press when published last November, including this one in the NYT and other articles discussed in the previous thread.
https://forum.lowcarber.org/showthread.php?t=481579
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Sat, Mar-09-19, 17:27
Dodger's Avatar
Dodger Dodger is offline
Posts: 8,764
 
Plan: Paleoish/Keto
Stats: 225/167/175 Male 71.5 inches
BF:18%
Progress: 116%
Location: Longmont, Colorado
Default

20% of calories from carbs is not really low-carb even. I wonder what the results would have been if the carbs were 5% or less.
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Sat, Mar-09-19, 17:48
nawchem's Avatar
nawchem nawchem is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 8,701
 
Plan: No gluten, CAD
Stats: 196.0/158.5/149.0 Female 62
BF:36/29.0/27.3
Progress: 80%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JEY100
This study received a large amount of press when published last November, including this one in the NYT and other articles discussed in the previous thread.
https://forum.lowcarber.org/showthread.php?t=481579

Thanks jey!
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Sat, Mar-09-19, 17:50
nawchem's Avatar
nawchem nawchem is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 8,701
 
Plan: No gluten, CAD
Stats: 196.0/158.5/149.0 Female 62
BF:36/29.0/27.3
Progress: 80%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dodger
20% of calories from carbs is not really low-carb even. I wonder what the results would have been if the carbs were 5% or less.

I think even better. I think Dr. Atkins found research studies on this done in the 90s. Anything Atkins related was simply discredited. What would a Cornell graduate specializing in cardiology know?
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Sun, Mar-10-19, 03:22
JEY100's Avatar
JEY100 JEY100 is offline
Posts: 13,430
 
Plan: P:E/DDF
Stats: 225/150/169 Female 5' 9"
BF:45%/28%/25%
Progress: 134%
Location: NC
Default

Dr Eric Westman did the first clinical research using the Atkins diet with 20g carbs, but could only get funding from The Atkins Foundation. So even though the studies were well conducted at Duke and the VA, the results were dismissed with claims of COI. The history and referenced studies are in Why We Get Fat by Gary Taubes. He also mentioned Westman's studies Friday at Low Carb Denver, and Dr Ludwig spoke yesterday about this study in detail.
https://forum.lowcarber.org/showthread.php?t=482120

1998...so 20 years and "the metabolic advantage" is still debated. The are many good articles about it in the November thread linked in previous post.

Last edited by JEY100 : Sun, Mar-10-19 at 04:24.
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Sun, Mar-10-19, 04:38
M Levac M Levac is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 6,498
 
Plan: VLC, mostly meat
Stats: 202/200/165 Male 5' 7"
BF:
Progress: 5%
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Default

Quote:
"This is the largest and longest feeding study to test the 'Carbohydrate-Insulin Model,' which provides a new way to think about and treat obesity," says David Ludwig

Nope, not by a long shot. The longest and largest feeding study to test the carbohydrate-insulin model is still the A-TO-Z study by Chris Gardner. He did cite Gardner's follow-up study, the DIETFITS study, it's number 58 in the list.

Maybe the claim can be made that this is the largest and longest study to test specifically the metabolic advantage part of the model.

Either way, this one's still good for reference.

-edit- No wait, it says "feeding" study. Ignore the above then.
Reply With Quote
  #8   ^
Old Sun, Mar-10-19, 04:38
WereBear's Avatar
WereBear WereBear is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 14,674
 
Plan: EpiPaleo/Primal/LowOx
Stats: 220/130/150 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 129%
Location: USA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dodger
20% of calories from carbs is not really low-carb even. I wonder what the results would have been if the carbs were 5% or less.


If you listen to nutritionists, it would be SPONTANEOUS HUMAN COMBUSTION.
Reply With Quote
  #9   ^
Old Sun, Mar-10-19, 06:53
Calianna's Avatar
Calianna Calianna is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,891
 
Plan: Atkins-ish (hypoglycemia)
Stats: 000/000/000 Female 63
BF:
Progress: 50%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JEY100
Dr Eric Westman did the first clinical research using the Atkins diet with 20g carbs, but could only get funding from The Atkins Foundation. So even though the studies were well conducted at Duke and the VA, the results were dismissed with claims of COI. The history and referenced studies are in Why We Get Fat by Gary Taubes. He also mentioned Westman's studies Friday at Low Carb Denver, and Dr Ludwig spoke yesterday about this study in detail.
https://forum.lowcarber.org/showthread.php?t=482120

1998...so 20 years and "the metabolic advantage" is still debated. The are many good articles about it in the November thread linked in previous post.



And yet numerous poorly designed studies, funded by Kelloggs, General Mills, etc, using extremely fuzzy math to arrive at ridiculous conclusions are NEVER automatically dismissed due to conflict of interest.


Right.
Reply With Quote
  #10   ^
Old Sun, Mar-10-19, 09:10
GRB5111's Avatar
GRB5111 GRB5111 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 4,041
 
Plan: Very LC, Higher Protein
Stats: 227/186/185 Male 6' 0"
BF:
Progress: 98%
Location: Herndon, VA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calianna
And yet numerous poorly designed studies, funded by Kelloggs, General Mills, etc, using extremely fuzzy math to arrive at ridiculous conclusions are NEVER automatically dismissed due to conflict of interest.


Right.

The way of the world lately, supported by religiously-motivated food manufacturers' money widely shared with anyone in academia willing to support this blatant COI.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 19:23.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.