Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Mark Forums Read Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Wed, May-01-19, 01:35
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 26,729
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/153/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 109%
Location: UK
Default Lessons for parents in British city put child obesity into reverse

From The Times
London, UK
1 May, 2019

Quote:
Lessons for parents in Leeds put child obesity into reverse

A city has become the first in Britain to reduce childhood obesity after introducing mass parenting lessons, a study has revealed.

Leeds has reported that its poorest pre-school children have become thinner while nationally the obesity gap between rich and poor has widened. The data has been hailed as “astonishing”. Parenting classes for hundreds of families, which teach them how to encourage children to eat more healthily and exercise more, have been credited with making progress not seen elsewhere.

Ministers have praised the results, and experts have urged other cities to similarly target new parents.

In Leeds obesity rates in children starting school averaged 9.4 per cent between 2009 and 2013, falling to an average of 8.8 per cent over the next four years, while remaining stable in England as a whole.

The biggest fall was in the most deprived fifth of children, where rates fell from 11.5 per cent to 10.5 per cent.

Across England, obesity in this group was unchanged at 12 per cent, while in a sample of 15 cities that are demographically similar to Leeds it rose from 11.6 per cent to 11.7 per cent, according to data presented at the European Congress on Obesity in Glasgow.

Susan Jebb, a professor of diet and population health at the University of Oxford, who analysed the figures, said: “The most dramatic thing is if you look at it by deprivation: the most deprived group in Leeds is doing especially well. That is astonishing. We know there is this striking relationship in England between deprivation and obesity. Nationally this gap is getting wider. But in Leeds in the reception class children there is something really striking that has gone on.”

Richer children nationally are becoming thinner, but while reception age obesity rates among the better off fell from 6.7 per cent to 6.3 per cent in England, in Leeds they fell from 6.8 per cent to 6 per cent.

Professor Jebb said the paper could not prove what had caused the decline, but linked it to a decision in Leeds to focus on pre-school children by training staff such as health visitors in “authoritative” parenting and offering classes at children’s centres.

“For new parents, parenting is all new behaviour,” Professor Jebb said. “You’re not trying to change the way they feed their children, you’re giving them a start on feeding their children.” She said ministers had shied away from the issue as they did not want to be seen to blame parents but that schools had reached the limit of what they could do when one in ten arrive already obese.

Obesity specialists have been praising a reduction in child obesity in Amsterdam, which has also introduced parenting classes. Professor Jebb said: “Everybody is going around saying Amsterdam is doing something amazing. Well, actually Leeds is too.”

Kim Roberts, of the charity Henry (Health, Exercise, Nutrition for the Really Young) said that while 34 cities used its approach, Leeds was unique in the scale and persistence of its commitment, which began a decade ago. “I would very much hope that other cities look at the inspiring example,” she said.

Tips include guided choice, such as offering children the option of carrots or broccoli for dinner rather than anything they like. Parents are advised to set a good example, including eating family meals together.

“It’s usually not information that people are lacking, it is confidence and motivation,” Ms Roberts said, adding that she wanted to give parents strength to set boundaries and resist “pester power”.

Seema Kennedy, the public health minister, is preparing national action on pre-school children. She said: “It’s great to see some promising reductions in childhood obesity . . . I hope we can learn more about this kind of work.”


https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/...verse-2fbrzc8mc



Quote:
LEEDS OBESITY PLAN

Leeds child obesity: ‘My two-year-old only ate baked beans’


Like many two-year-olds, Libby-Joy Mould was a fussy eater. “She would eat beans and sausages seven days a week,” her mother Belinda recalled.

The hope of finding ways to broaden her daughter’s diet helped to attract Ms Mould to parenting classes at a Leeds children’s centre. Through the course she found a way to make healthy eating fun so that Libby-Joy, now three, will happily devour broccoli, peas and sweetcorn. “She’s brilliant now, she eats just about everything,” Ms Mould, 40, said.

Although she found some of the cookery and nutritional information “quite basic”, Ms Mould said the parenting tips had made a real difference to how she raised her daughter. “What was really helpful was the idea of ‘guided choice’. I found that really fascinating. So you don’t ask, ‘Do you want to go to the park or do you want to stay at home?’ You say, ‘We’re going to the park, would you like to wear your red boots or blue boots?’ So they get some say in it.”

Giving children choice within clear boundaries also worked with food. “I would say to her, ‘Would you like scrambled eggs or would you like beans? Would you like toast or would you like beans?’ Because she still had the choice of beans, she started to try other things. That worked well.”

The classes also helped Ms Mould when her daughter did something infuriating. Instead of commanding Libby-Joy not to reach for a glass on the counter, the aim was to explain why it would be dangerous if it fell and smashed.

Remembering the lessons in the heat of family disputes could still be a challenge, she conceded, but she had taken to heart lessons on the importance of parents’ “recharging their batteries”, and going off to meditate instead of getting furious. “That has made a massive difference,” she said.

Libby-Joy is thriving and healthy and yesterday spent an hour and a half running about in the park, looking for beetles and ladybirds.

Janice Burberry, who oversees the programme for Leeds city council, said the strategy was “about sitting alongside parents and thinking through what’s right for them. Parents want to do the best for their children.”

Classes range from practical issues such as where to buy cheap vegetables locally and how to make them last in the freezer, to the importance of empathy. “It’s a real mix of factual stuff about what you should be eating and being active but also about being a responsive parent,” Ms Burberry said. “It is up to you to set boundaries.”

She said it was crucial that classes were available to all parents rather than targeted at those with problems.

“We wouldn’t be telling them they need to come, because that wouldn’t work. They have to want to come,” she said. “It’s completely no-blame. We are not coming round pointing the finger at parents and saying, ‘There is an issue here and it’s your responsibility’. That’s absolutely key.”

Dutch city has the recipe for cutting obesity

Six years ago the city of Amsterdam was spurred into action by worryingly high levels of child obesity. Now its extreme measures are paying off (writes Bruno Waterfield).

Children are banned from taking fruit juice or other soft drinks into school, where only tap water is allowed. Also outlawed are birthday feasts of cakes or sweets in the classroom and branches of McDonald’s operating near schools have agreed that unaccompanied children can only buy fruit, not chips or burgers.

To ram home the message to the fast food industry, Amsterdam’s city council refuses sponsorship to events that take money from Coca Cola or McDonald’s.

Parents are encouraged to put small children on bikes without pedals or to get them walking to school rather than wheeling them there in push chairs.

In 2013, more than 20 per cent of children in the Dutch city were found to be overweight or obese, way above the national average of 13 per cent in the Netherlands.

The “Amsterdam model” of tackling obesity, costing £5 million a year, begins with counselling for pregnant women and continues for the first 1,000 days of a child’s life. The results are striking. The council’s health department figures show the number of overweight and obese children in Amsterdam to be down 12 per cent while the national average has remained the same.

Children and parents are given cooking classes to teach, as the council puts it, “healthy varieties of ethnic dishes”.


https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...beans-320cxbhgh
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Wed, May-01-19, 01:57
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 26,729
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/153/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 109%
Location: UK
Default

Quote:
Leeds becomes first UK city to lower its childhood obesity rate

City’s Henry programme gives children choices while helping parents maintain boundaries


https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...od-obesity-rate

Quote:
The Henry Programme

At HENRY we are passionate about babies and young children getting the best possible start in life. This means supporting the whole family to make positive lifestyle changes, creating healthier and happier home environments, and building healthier communities.

Over the past 10 years we have supported thousands of families to transform family life for the better in all sorts of ways – including improved nutrition, emotional wellbeing, parenting skills, breastfeeding, and getting more active. We have worked with over 10,000 health and early years practitioners and collaborated with NHS trusts, local authorities, and many other partners.

https://www.henry.org.uk
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Wed, May-01-19, 06:04
WereBear's Avatar
WereBear WereBear is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 14,674
 
Plan: EpiPaleo/Primal/LowOx
Stats: 220/130/150 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 129%
Location: USA
Default

This is AWESOME stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Wed, May-01-19, 07:40
jschwab jschwab is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 6,378
 
Plan: Atkins72/Paleo/NoGrain/IF
Stats: 285/220/200 Female 5 feet 5.5 inches
BF:
Progress: 76%
Default

I hope they are expanding into physical skills, too. That is the alarming thing I see here. When I was a kid, even the heavy kids still did all the basic physical activities (me included!) because of recess and gym class and just being bored and taking off on our bikes, playing games. I teach swimming and now I see kids -- whether they are thin or fat, whether they play a sport or not -- and their bodies are destroyed by hours of sitting at school and inside at home with no exercise, no recess. They have very little physical facility and their strength is very low, regardless of weight. I started incorporating a lot of varied activities in my classes because I know they are likely not getting the activity anywhere else but it's such an upward battle. It's a smoking time bomb, honestly, so much more so than weight for me. The next generation will die very young, I think. Once you don't develop properly as a child, it's very hard to make up for lack of balance, grip strength, coordination, etc. All of those things you need to keep yourself going as you age. I was the least athletic kid in my grade school and I was a thousand times more athletic than the kids I teach. The preschoolers are fine - it's the start of school that is robbing these kids of their physicality. It terrifies me, honestly.
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Wed, May-01-19, 11:43
CityGirl8 CityGirl8 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 856
 
Plan: Protein Power, IF
Stats: 238/204/145 Female 5'8"
BF:53.75%/46.6%/25%
Progress: 37%
Location: PNW
Default

I find all this food choice stuff for three-year-olds quite fascinating. When I was a kid, you ate what your mom put on the table and you shut up about it. If you were lucky, you had the kind of parents who let you serve yourself as long as you had some of everything (including the broccoli). If you weren't lucky, you had the kind of parents who served you and made you sit at the table until you cleaned your plate. There were no choices. Occasionally, my mom would ask us what kind of sandwiches we wanted for lunch when we were in elementary school.

Within a generation, moms and dads had turned into short order cooks at dinner time, making different meals for different demands. If kids didn't like what was on the table they could get up and go make themselves something different.

I don't even know why that mom is negotiating with her kid about baked beans. Put some food on the table and tell her that's what there is to eat. The kid will pitch a hissy fit for two weeks (because her mother already taught her she can eat what she likes) and then will settle down and adjust to the new normal.

90% of the "my kid only eats xxxx" really translates to "I'm willing to only give my kid xxxx." (The other 10% is kids with genuine sensory issues, ASD, etc., and so beside the point of this rant.)
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Wed, May-01-19, 12:06
jschwab jschwab is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 6,378
 
Plan: Atkins72/Paleo/NoGrain/IF
Stats: 285/220/200 Female 5 feet 5.5 inches
BF:
Progress: 76%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CityGirl8
I find all this food choice stuff for three-year-olds quite fascinating. When I was a kid, you ate what your mom put on the table and you shut up about it. If you were lucky, you had the kind of parents who let you serve yourself as long as you had some of everything (including the broccoli). If you weren't lucky, you had the kind of parents who served you and made you sit at the table until you cleaned your plate. There were no choices. Occasionally, my mom would ask us what kind of sandwiches we wanted for lunch when we were in elementary school.

Within a generation, moms and dads had turned into short order cooks at dinner time, making different meals for different demands. If kids didn't like what was on the table they could get up and go make themselves something different.

I don't even know why that mom is negotiating with her kid about baked beans. Put some food on the table and tell her that's what there is to eat. The kid will pitch a hissy fit for two weeks (because her mother already taught her she can eat what she likes) and then will settle down and adjust to the new normal.

90% of the "my kid only eats xxxx" really translates to "I'm willing to only give my kid xxxx." (The other 10% is kids with genuine sensory issues, ASD, etc., and so beside the point of this rant.)


Totally agree. My mom has sensory issues but just didn't eat or ate slowly as a kid. She adapted. I have known way too many kids in feeding therapy over pickiness, basically. Kids control what they can control if they are in an out of control environment and food is the easiest one to control.
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Wed, May-01-19, 12:17
Ms Arielle's Avatar
Ms Arielle Ms Arielle is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 19,217
 
Plan: atkins, carnivore 2023
Stats: 200/211/163 Female 5'8"
BF:
Progress: -30%
Location: Massachusetts
Default

Hurray!!!! Much easier to start with NEW parents to help get their youngsters off in the right direction!! My kids were good healthy eaters.... until they went to school and saw all the junk kids ate for snacks AND the junk the school provided.




Quote:
now I see kids -- whether they are thin or fat, whether they play a sport or not -- and their bodies are destroyed by hours of sitting at school and inside at home with no exercise, no recess.


After 3 years sitting at a PC all day 5 days a week every other week, and then at home playing or homework, his body is weakened and needs a slow program to get back up to his old soccer shape.

He DID NOT want to do track as ALL his friends in IT dont do any sports at all.

My youngest had a shot at a private school which requires ALL students to participate in sports from 2-5 every day. Sadly he didnt get in. BUT he is self driven enough to do a work out most days.
Reply With Quote
  #8   ^
Old Wed, May-01-19, 12:50
jschwab jschwab is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 6,378
 
Plan: Atkins72/Paleo/NoGrain/IF
Stats: 285/220/200 Female 5 feet 5.5 inches
BF:
Progress: 76%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ms Arielle


After 3 years sitting at a PC all day 5 days a week every other week, and then at home playing or homework, his body is weakened and needs a slow program to get back up to his old soccer shape.

He DID NOT want to do track as ALL his friends in IT dont do any sports at all.

My youngest had a shot at a private school which requires ALL students to participate in sports from 2-5 every day. Sadly he didnt get in. BUT he is self driven enough to do a work out most days.


That private school sounds amazing!

My experience is that doing sports doesn't quite cut it. My kids did A sport but most sports are very focused nowadays on very specific physical skills and limited in the functional fitness that they teach. My kids have never done a cartwheel! I was the LAZIEST kid but I still danced, biked, ran, did gymnastics, etc. I did a variety of things. That's been the most startling for me - how physically limited even the kids who do sports are because it's so specialized. They do the sport as an activity and, in between, they do nothing.
Reply With Quote
  #9   ^
Old Wed, May-01-19, 13:05
Ms Arielle's Avatar
Ms Arielle Ms Arielle is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 19,217
 
Plan: atkins, carnivore 2023
Stats: 200/211/163 Female 5'8"
BF:
Progress: -30%
Location: Massachusetts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jschwab
That private school sounds amazing!

My experience is that doing sports doesn't quite cut it. My kids did A sport but most sports are very focused nowadays on very specific physical skills and limited in the functional fitness that they teach. My kids have never done a cartwheel! I was the LAZIEST kid but I still danced, biked, ran, did gymnastics, etc. I did a variety of things. That's been the most startling for me - how physically limited even the kids who do sports are because it's so specialized. They do the sport as an activity and, in between, they do nothing.


There is a study that shows organized sports is not all its cracked up to be. UN organized sports leads to a longer life. ( Got this from a gardener on his way back from a conference; he sat next to an MD at a different conference. Gardening was among the top 4 activities for longevity.)

As for foods: getting kids to eat right is a challenge given the "normal" SAD fare that abounds.
Reply With Quote
  #10   ^
Old Wed, May-01-19, 13:07
DaisyDawn's Avatar
DaisyDawn DaisyDawn is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 363
 
Plan: Higher P/Moderate F + C
Stats: 152/146.6/130 Female 66
BF:
Progress: 25%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jschwab
Totally agree. My mom has sensory issues but just didn't eat or ate slowly as a kid. She adapted. I have known way too many kids in feeding therapy over pickiness, basically. Kids control what they can control if they are in an out of control environment and food is the easiest one to control.


I have two kiddos with ADHD and one is underweight, (he goes in for regular weigh-ins with his pediatrician, to make sure he doesn't get too low, and my other one is border-line underweight). For both of them their default is to not eat, which can be just as unhealthy as a kid who's overeating and overweight. It's a pain but I am that short-order cook mom who makes different foods for different family members. And then after I make them food that I know they like I have to make sure they can actually focus long enough to eat it sigh.... I don't know why parents would do this voluntarily if they didn't have to-I dream of preparing a meal that's all the same for everyone
Reply With Quote
  #11   ^
Old Wed, May-01-19, 13:21
jschwab jschwab is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 6,378
 
Plan: Atkins72/Paleo/NoGrain/IF
Stats: 285/220/200 Female 5 feet 5.5 inches
BF:
Progress: 76%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ms Arielle
There is a study that shows organized sports is not all its cracked up to be. UN organized sports leads to a longer life. ( Got this from a gardener on his way back from a conference; he sat next to an MD at a different conference. Gardening was among the top 4 activities for longevity.)

As for foods: getting kids to eat right is a challenge given the "normal" SAD fare that abounds.


Yes, and I see it all the time. Even with my own kids whish is super-depressing. When they were little, we went to the park but there were hardly ever kids to play with because all of the other parents kept their kids home. So they didn't learn to do a lot of new things. I force myself to play around. In between teaching (I teach swim lessons), I will goof off and do handstands, flips stuff like that. I look crazy but my functional fitness has improved more doing that than it ever did doing endless laps. I ended up incorporating a lot of that into my lessons. It used to be kids did handstands in the pool to show off.
Reply With Quote
  #12   ^
Old Wed, May-01-19, 15:18
Zei Zei is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,596
 
Plan: Carb reduction in general
Stats: 230/185/180 Female 5 ft 9 in
BF:
Progress: 90%
Location: Texas
Default

I was the "unlucky" kid whose very well-meaning parents dished up the amount they thought would be good (way more than I wanted and very unappealing taste) and made me sit and cry at the table. No choice, yes. But better than for my mom, whose relatives required her to eat things they knew every time would make her ill and vomit. Because "children must eat what's put in front of them." Period. Wow, glad that kind of inflexible and unsympathetic kind of culture has passed on. Pretty sure I went a bit farther in the opposite direction to make sure my kids never had to endure that kind of insensitive treatment. Maybe that kind of reaction is why so many people play short-order cook for their kids now, the pendulum swinging a bit too far off the other way but at least not where it was.
Edit to add: I really like the idea they promoted in the article of giving children a choice between two things that will both get the needed job done. Everyone including kids like to feel they're being treated with respect, like being offered choices rather than being bossed around, and it still accomplishes the task so this is great.

Last edited by Zei : Wed, May-01-19 at 15:27.
Reply With Quote
  #13   ^
Old Wed, May-01-19, 16:07
jschwab jschwab is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 6,378
 
Plan: Atkins72/Paleo/NoGrain/IF
Stats: 285/220/200 Female 5 feet 5.5 inches
BF:
Progress: 76%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zei
I was the "unlucky" kid whose very well-meaning parents dished up the amount they thought would be good (way more than I wanted and very unappealing taste) and made me sit and cry at the table. No choice, yes. But better than for my mom, whose relatives required her to eat things they knew every time would make her ill and vomit. Because "children must eat what's put in front of them." Period. Wow, glad that kind of inflexible and unsympathetic kind of culture has passed on. Pretty sure I went a bit farther in the opposite direction to make sure my kids never had to endure that kind of insensitive treatment. Maybe that kind of reaction is why so many people play short-order cook for their kids now, the pendulum swinging a bit too far off the other way but at least not where it was.
Edit to add: I really like the idea they promoted in the article of giving children a choice between two things that will both get the needed job done. Everyone including kids like to feel they're being treated with respect, like being offered choices rather than being bossed around, and it still accomplishes the task so this is great.


So well-put! I agree wholeheartedly with these sentiments. That's where I see the craziness. Is it really worth a struggle when you can - within reason and with choices not dictatorship - make mealtime pleasant? We had a couple we invited for a birthday party once who brought their toddler over with his uneaten dinner in a baggie (they ate very early). He wasn't allowed to have the cake we were sharing until he ate his bagged up dinner and he flipped out, of course. It was so socially inappropriate, led to a screaming fit and I was in shock. Not surprisingly, he continued to have serious eating issues.
Reply With Quote
  #14   ^
Old Wed, May-01-19, 20:26
Merpig's Avatar
Merpig Merpig is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 7,582
 
Plan: EF/Fung IDM/keto
Stats: 375/225.4/175 Female 66.5 inches
BF:
Progress: 75%
Location: NE Florida
Default

I always had to be a member of the “clean plate” club as a kid and I hated it. My mom was forever making green peas as our vegetable and I totally loathed them, but was forced to eat them anyway! I’m now 67 years old and I will still never voluntarily allow a green pea to cross my lips. Hate them just as much now as I did as a 3-4 year old.

But preparation can matter too. My mom only used frozen freezer-burned veggies which she would boil into a mush. My dismay at being served Brussels sprouts was almost as bad as my pea dismay. But now Brussels sprouts are one of my favorites! But I get fresh Brussels sprouts which I toss with olive oil, garlic and parsley powder, and salt, and roast until nicely browned. Yum

But I’m sure distressed when I see the food they serve at my grandkids’ school. Luckily they usually brown bag it, but one day I went to have lunch with my granddaughter at her school with her. The food was appalling, nothing remotely edible. I ended up getting a corn dog and peeling off the corn to eat the hotdog underneath. The lunch lady tried to get me to take some green beans too - though they were clearly the “canned beans cooked into mush” variety. Eeek! “you need to set a good example for your granddaughter” she urged me, since she had also refused the green beans. No thanks.

But my granddaughter will happily eat two servings of green beans as prepared by her mother: fresh beans lightly sautéed in butter with salt and garlic. “But those beans at school are awful” she confided in me. I could only agree just from looking at them.
Reply With Quote
  #15   ^
Old Wed, May-01-19, 23:24
rightnow's Avatar
rightnow rightnow is offline
Every moment is NOW.
Posts: 23,064
 
Plan: LC (ketogenic)
Stats: 520/381/280 Female 66 inches
BF: Why yes it is.
Progress: 58%
Location: Ozarks USA
Default

News flash: parents who are given psychological permission to feel it's ok to behave like a parent, tend to behave more like a parent, which is generally a better nutritional outcome than a 2-8 year old will choose on their own.

The only thing amazing about this is that it took someone this long to figure it out. Obviously targeting the parents is the solution to improving* childhood obesity. Normally when people say that though they're called haterz!

PJ

* improving, not ending. The multi generations of obesity, and obese or high glucose maternal environ, is likely responsible for a good % of the problems children have with obesity. Some people are literally born fat and it never changes. But certainly everything helps. And 'fat' can certainly be a matter of degree -- so, the lower the better.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:38.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.