Mon, Jan-05-09, 12:24
|
Senior Member
Posts: 382
|
|
Plan: No caffeine, no alcohol
Stats: 175/154/150
BF:
Progress: 84%
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zilly
Tomsey - thanks for clarifying. I didn't mean to insult you in any way. I was just confused b/c I saw only posts in the War Zone based on your profile and history.
I agree that it's completely individual. Personally, I find that I lose weight on LC even though my calories are higher. I have tried a number of lower-protein, low-fat, high-fiber diets, and regardless of how low I went with calories, I never lost.
I do want to point out that up until 10,000 years ago, humans subsisted on a diet of almost all meat, with some nuts and berries based on what was available. Essentially, we're dealing with 150,000 generations of hunters/meat-eaters and only a few hundred generations of grain eaters. Our physiology has not caught up with the added grains, much less with all the chemical-laden fare that is available now. Until our bodies evolve to the point where they can readily process carbohydrates, most people do better sticking to a lower-carb WOE. Notice I said "most." There have been, and always will be, anomalies. (My DH can eat everything under the sun and his weight never changes, for example.)
|
no probs, i guess i do like to argue a little
i've read a lot of the paleo stuff and i find dairy, legumes and fruits bother me, not so much wheat and potatoes... oatmeal, quinoa and many cereals disagree with me but i dont get much ill effect from say pasta.... I think i do benefit from a lower carb diet
|