Originally Posted by less_tara

Currently, most peer review is single-blinded. I.e. the authors of the papers are visible to the reviewers, who remain anonymous. I think it should be the other way around. For the purposes of the review process, author information should be removed from the manuscript, resulting in an anonymous manuscript. And reviewers, faced with an anonymous manuscript, work under the knowledge that their names, corrections and what they impose on the paper will be fully disclosed at the time of publication.