View Single Post
  #140   ^
Old Fri, Oct-21-05, 20:50
eve25's Avatar
eve25 eve25 is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 491
 
Plan: atkins
Stats: 315/274/175 Female 69 inches
BF:
Progress: 29%
Default

i just read this WHOLE thread from the beginning....WHEW.
i think the big issue with these people is that, not only were they vegan, but they ate only RAW food. so obviously that baby had no milk and no formula (not even vegan or soy as it would have to be heated/preserved in a can). how is that NOT child abuse??

all the talk about the LAW and semantics issues like "common sense" and what's "reasonable" is so irrelevant. how many chances did this lady have:
breastfeeding?___couldnt
formula?____wouldnt
weight gain?___not there
NO EXCUSE for that. if she was reading up on rawfoods and veganism, couldnt she have found one book about child development???

another similar situation (but alot luckier)
http://www.vegfamily.com/blog/?p=6
(you gotta love how the vegan owner of the site doesnt comment/defend anymore after someone posts the press release)
Reply With Quote