Tue, Mar-19-19, 03:46
|
 |
|
|
Plan: P:E/DDF
Stats: 225/150/169
BF:45%/28%/25%
Progress: 134%
Location: NC
|
|
Another good rebuttal from Dr Scher:
Eggs are bad – then good – then bad again? What gives?
https://www.dietdoctor.com/eggs-are...gain-what-gives
One quote
Quote:
On the surface, this appears to be an impressive study. A large sample cohort, lengthy follow up, and important outcome measures such as all-cause mortality as well as heart disease events.
Looking deeper, however, we see that the subjects provided only one food frequency questionnaire at the time of enrollment. That’s it. One data sample to estimate dietary habits in 17 years of follow-up.
The entire study is based on an unreliable food frequency questionnaire given one time only with absolutely no consideration of how patients’ diets may have changed over 17 years.
Does that sound like good science to you? Is it possible that people drastically altered their eating habits, other lifestyle activities, or other health parameters over 17 years? I would venture to say, “Yes, it is.”
|
|