I watched the first moderated panel, and it was so poorly moderated with panelists seething about provocative statements and one-upping one another, that it was useless in value. It's clear that agreement on what is healthy and the ability to craft a statement that helps the population achieve health with a sound nutritional approach has been and will continue to be a challenge. Today we have camps with some who are committed to a WOE based on results of N=1. Looks like that will continue, and when I hear cardiac health improvements confidently linked to consumption of vegetable seed oils and the elimination of trans fats, the reduction of red and processed meats, and the reduction of saturated fats, I hear an underlying pervasive disagreement among many "experts" that serves no purpose for moving forward.