tryptophan versus leucine, serotonin
First: whey protein will probably not decrease your lifespan. I don't buy this at all. But it's an interesting study, that has nothing to do with whey protein. So of course the headline is all about whey protein...
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releas...90430091826.htm
Quote:
Put down the protein shake: Variety of protein better for health
Popular protein great for increasing muscle mass, but could reduce your life-span -- researchers say to vary protein intake
Amino acids have long been touted by the fitness and bodybuilding communities for their muscle building benefits. From ultra-bulk protein powders to lean mass-promoting snack bars, there's no shortage of products available for those seeking a muscle boost.
However, protein's popularity has also meant that less attention has been paid to researching its potentially negative side-effects.
Published today in Nature Metabolism, new research led by academics from the University of Sydney's Charles Perkins Centre, Professor Stephen Simpson and Dr Samantha Solon-Biet, suggests that while delivering muscle-building benefits, excessive consumption of branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) may reduce lifespan, negatively impact mood and lead to weight gain.
BCAAs great for adding muscle mass, but science says you could pay for it later
Dr Solon-Biet's research has investigated the complex role nutrition plays in mediating various aspects of metabolic health, reproduction, appetite and ageing.
"While diets high in protein and low in carbohydrates were shown to be beneficial for reproductive function, they had detrimental effects for health in mid-late life, and also led to a shortened lifespan," she explained.
"What this new research has shown is that amino acid balance is important -- it's best to vary sources of protein to ensure you're getting the best amino acid balance."
BCAAs could influence mood -- and lead to overeating
The current research examined the impacts that dietary BCAAs and other essential amino acids such as tryptophan had on the health and body composition of mice.
"Supplementation of BCAAs resulted in high levels of BCAAs in the blood which competed with tryptophan for transport into the brain," explained Academic Director of the Charles Perkins Centre's and researcher from the School of Life and Environmental Sciences Professor Stephen Simpson.
"Tryptophan is the sole precursor for the hormone serotonin, which is often called the 'happiness chemical' for its mood-enhancing effects and its role in promoting sleep. But serotonin does more than this, and therein lay the problem," he said.
"This then lowered serotonin levels in the brain, which in turn was a potent signal to increase appetite. The serotonin decrease caused by excess BCAA intake led to massive overeating in our mice, which became hugely obese and lived shorter lives."
Mice were fed double the normal amount of BCAAs (200%), the standard amount (100%), half (50%) or one fifth (20%) for life. Mice who were fed 200% BCAAs increased their food intake, resulting in obesity and a shortened lifespan.
Increase protein variety for health benefits
Qualified dietitian and public health nutritionist from the University of Sydney's School of Life and Environmental Sciences Dr Rosilene Ribeiro recommends eating a wide-range of proteins.
It's important to vary protein sources in order to get a variety of essential amino acids, through a healthy and balanced diet rich in fibre, vitamins and minerals.
BCAAs are essential amino acids present in protein-containing foods, with red meat and dairy being the richest sources. Chicken, fish and eggs are also nutritious sources of BCAAs.
Vegetarians can find BCAAs in beans, lentils, nuts and soy proteins.
Foods rich in tryptophan include seeds and nuts, soy beans, cheese, chicken,turkey and interestingly, crocodile.
About BCAAs
BCAAs are a group of three essential amino acids: leucine, isoleucine and valine, and are most commonly found in red meat and dairy. Whey protein -- the most popular form of fitness protein -- is made from dairy by-products and contains high levels of BCAA.
|
Wasn't quite sure where to put this.
Potatoes not Prozac and other carbs versus depression plans are based on some tryptophan versus leucine studies. It's a total misreading of the science. Feed an animal some carbohydrate, almost protein-free--insulin etc. increases protein synthesis, this draws leucine and other branched chain amino acids out of circulation, increased tryptophan to leucine etc. ratio results in increased tryptophan across the brain barrier, and increased serotonin. But it only works with very low protein, potatoes have too much protein for the effect.
This study also looks a bit misreported. They talk about "foods rich in tryptophan" or leucine. But
Quote:
|
Mice were fed double the normal amount of BCAAs (200%), the standard amount (100%), half (50%) or one fifth (20%) for life.
|
This is too precise. Without a semi-purified diet, with added branched chain amino acids, they couldn't get these numbers while keeping things like protein content of the diet constant.
Quote:
|
Here, we show that when dietary BCAAs are varied against a fixed, isocaloric macronutrient background, long-term exposure to high BCAA diets leads to hyperphagia, obesity and reduced lifespan.
|
and
Quote:
|
These effects are not due to elevated BCAA per se or hepatic mammalian target of rapamycin activation, but instead are due to a shift in the relative quantity of dietary BCAAs and other amino acids, notably tryptophan and threonine. Increasing the ratio of BCAAs to these amino acids results in hyperphagia and is associated with central serotonin depletion.
|
they don't quite specifically say that protein intake was kept constant, but that would be too much of a confounder, if they didn't keep it constant, I'm not sure how they could assume a ratio of this to that rather than absolute quantity of the aminos was to blame.
Going from this, to food...Eating twice as much turkey is not going to increase leucine: tryptophan in the diet as a ratio. Can we make assumptions that high leucine whey will give poor results? Wait a minute, this is a mouse study. Switching mice to whey versus casein, at least, generally improves things.
Cronometer gives whey as a fairly good source for leucine. But at a dose that shows 100 percent of the day's "requirement" for leucine, it shows 200 percent of the requirement for tryptophan. Looking at various other protein sources, that's a pretty good ratio if you think increasing tryptophan:leucine is a good idea.
I'm not crazy about whey protein because it's got all the non-protein nutrition removed. But as a protein, it's probably fine. |