View Single Post
  #3   ^
Old Sat, Oct-13-18, 12:43
Grav Grav is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,469
 
Plan: Banting
Stats: 302/187/187 Male 175cm
BF:
Progress: 100%
Location: New Zealand
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GRB5111
This is good news that the principles of IF are getting acknowledged. The BMJ is playing a large role in communicating sound science on nutrition along with taking an important stand in 2016 to not retract Nina Teicholz's article about the DGAs. The BMJ has become a beacon to shine a light on nutritional science. Very encouraging.

I wonder how much of an effect BMJ editor-in-chief Fiona Godlee is having when it comes to publication of "new" angles in nutrition science. I was impressed with her appearance at the Swiss Re conference earlier this year, she seemed committed to trying to bring people with opposing views together and reaching consensus at whatever level it could be found.

Anyway, I'd love to see more case studies get this sort of attention. After all, what is a single case study but a carefully monitored n=1? We all have our own individual stories to tell, and as someone in the Swiss Re audience suggested at the time, there are an awful lot of n=1 successes out there.
Reply With Quote