Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Tue, Apr-19-16, 04:51
JEY100's Avatar
JEY100 JEY100 is online now
Posts: 13,439
 
Plan: P:E/DDF
Stats: 225/150/169 Female 5' 9"
BF:45%/28%/25%
Progress: 134%
Location: NC
Default The Full-Fat Paradox: Dairy Fat Linked To Lower Diabetes Risk

Quote:
If you melt at the creaminess of full-fat yogurt, read on.

A new study finds the dairy fats found in milk, yogurt and cheese may help protect against Type 2 diabetes.

The research, published in the journal Circulation, included 3,333 adults. Beginning in the late 1980s, researchers took blood samples from the participants and measured circulating levels of biomarkers of dairy fat in their blood. Then, over the next two decades, the researchers tracked who among the participants developed diabetes.

"People who had the most dairy fat in their diet had about a 50 percent lower risk of diabetes" compared with people who consumed the least dairy fat, says Dariush Mozaffarian, dean of the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University, who is also an author of the study.

The study does not prove a cause and effect, but it builds on a body of evidence suggesting that dairy fat may have protective effects, both in cutting the risk of diabetes and in helping people control body weight.

"For a long time we've had this notion that saturated fat [the kind found in dairy products] is always bad for you," says Mark DeBoer, a pediatrician at the University of Virginia.

But this assumption is being questioned. As we've previously reported, DeBoer has studied the connection between dairy fat and children's body weight. And he published a surprising finding.

"It appears that children who have a higher intake of whole milk or 2 percent milk gain less weight over time" compared with kids who consume skim or nonfat dairy products, explains DeBoer.

And there's some evidence that dairy fat may help adults manage weight as well. As we've reported, researchers in Sweden found that middle-aged men who consumed high-fat milk, butter and cream were significantly less likely to become obese over a period of 12 years compared with men who never or rarely ate high-fat dairy.

So, in other words, the butter and whole-milk eaters did better at keeping the pounds off. In addition, a meta-analysis -- which included data from 16 observational studies — also found evidence that high-fat dairy was associated with a lower risk of obesity.

Researchers can't fully explain these counterintuitive findings.

It's possible that "the fat in dairy makes you less hungry to eat some other foods," says DeBoer.

And there's evidence that "when people consume more low-fat dairy, they eat more carbohydrates" as a way of compensating, says Mozaffarian.

Many high-carb foods such as cereals, breads and snacks that contain highly refined grains are less satiating and can prompt people to eat more calories.

With all the new evidence that challenges the low-fat-is-best orthodoxy, Mozaffarian says it may be time to reconsider the National School Lunch Program rules, which allow only skim and low-fat milk.

"Our research indicates that the national policy should be neutral about dairy fat, until we learn more," says Mozaffarian.


Another paradox, fancy that?
"Researchers can't fully explain these counterintuitive findings."
Really? have they never seen any previous studies about fat, satiety, blood sugars, etc.?

http://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt...r-diabetes-risk

Last edited by JEY100 : Tue, Apr-19-16 at 05:08.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Tue, Apr-19-16, 08:10
Bintang's Avatar
Bintang Bintang is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 258
 
Plan: MyOwn:CHO<90g/d
Stats: 207/149/150 Male 169 cm
BF:40%/17%/18%
Progress: 102%
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JEY100
Another paradox, fancy that?
"Researchers can't fully explain these counterintuitive findings."
Really? have they never seen any previous studies about fat, satiety, blood sugars, etc.?

http://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt...r-diabetes-risk


I think you should read this as:
the journalist/writer of the article can't fully explain these counterintuitive findings and was too lazy to ask or do any independent checking.

But we are seeing the beginning of the back-pedalling from nutrition scientists and the medical profession. I think it will gather momentum and we will see many more of this type of article.

However, the very, very last thing they will admit (if ever) is that certain of their more clever colleagues such as Drs Phinney and Volek figured these things out long before they did and were ignored by the mainstream.
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Tue, Apr-19-16, 09:15
WereBear's Avatar
WereBear WereBear is online now
Senior Member
Posts: 14,683
 
Plan: EpiPaleo/Primal/LowOx
Stats: 220/130/150 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 129%
Location: USA
Default

Here's a clue, "journalists" and "nutritionists." When you have a paradox, it means some of your facts are not true.
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Tue, Apr-19-16, 10:00
bkloots's Avatar
bkloots bkloots is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 10,151
 
Plan: LC--Atkins
Stats: 195/160/150 Female 62in
BF:
Progress: 78%
Location: Kansas City, MO
Default

Quote:
"It appears that children who have a higher intake of whole milk or 2 percent milk gain less weight over time" compared with kids who consume skim or nonfat dairy products, explains DeBoer.
Let's see. How are all those infants going to get skim milk from a breast?? Seems like children fed exclusively on mother's milk for several months, or even years, might be in pretty good shape over the long run. I'm not a mom, but it's worrisome that moms for at least as long as the low-fat panic has been in effect have been counseled to give their children skim or 2 per cent, even when breast-feeding is concluded.
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Tue, Apr-19-16, 11:52
Squarecube's Avatar
Squarecube Squarecube is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 877
 
Plan: atkins/paleo/IF
Stats: 186.5/159.0/160 Male 5' 11"
BF:
Progress: 104%
Location: NYC
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkloots
Let's see. How are all those infants going to get skim milk from a breast?? snip


"Sumtin" just tells me that what today's mom produces, with her low fat yogurt, low fat milk, zero fat dressing.
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Wed, Apr-20-16, 03:50
Bintang's Avatar
Bintang Bintang is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 258
 
Plan: MyOwn:CHO<90g/d
Stats: 207/149/150 Male 169 cm
BF:40%/17%/18%
Progress: 102%
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkloots
…...but it's worrisome that moms for at least as long as the low-fat panic has been in effect have been counseled to give their children skim or 2 per cent, even when breast-feeding is concluded.


I had no idea that has been happening or that it was compulsory for schools to give kids only skim or low fat milk.

It makes the saga of Tim Noake's prosecution (for telling a mother to ween her child onto low carb high fat) even more bizarre. It shouldn't be Tim Noakes on trial. It should be those nutritionists who have been telling mothers to give their children skim or low fat milk.
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Wed, Apr-20-16, 07:50
WereBear's Avatar
WereBear WereBear is online now
Senior Member
Posts: 14,683
 
Plan: EpiPaleo/Primal/LowOx
Stats: 220/130/150 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 129%
Location: USA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bintang
It shouldn't be Tim Noakes on trial. It should be those nutritionists who have been telling mothers to give their children skim or low fat milk.


That is why I am rather excited that this is actually going to trial. Where it is kind of mandatory for each side to present their case.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:37.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.