Not a lot of information about these products out there, except of course, from the companies that are pushing them. What few scientific articles there are about any of the ingredients, are either inconclusive, or flat out show they don't work and don't live up to the claims.
Trying to read through the ads for this stuff though, is mind-boggling to say the least. Convoluted, misleading, vague, inaccurate and downright false! ..
The main ingredients for these "carb blockers" is a combination of any or all of the following :
- phaseolus vulgaris (or some "patented" name derived from it)
- gymnema sylvestre
- garcinia cambogia (hydroxycitrate)
- chromium
- chitosan
- possibly other vitamins or minerals
Phaseolus vulgaris is yer garden variety of white kidney bean. An extract of the raw bean has been shown to inhibit the production of alpha-amylase, an enzyme required for the breakdown of starch molecules into glucose. It's this same principle that makes ya FART when you eat baked beans. As the "undigested" starch moves throught the bowel, however, it is acted upon by normal bacteria, which brings about the conversion to glucose, and ends up being absorbed anyway. Another problem is that the pill likely gets acted upon by hydrochloric acid in the stomach, and the effect is diminished or even totally negated. Also, enzymes in our saliva begin the starch-breakdown and glucose-conversion process, long before the food ever reaches the small intestine.
(Beware of claims that digestion takes place in the stomach - it DOES NOT)
Gymnema sylvestre has a slightly more favourable reputation. It has been widely used in Ayurvedic medicine for blood sugar control and diabetes. However, for this purpose, it needs to be taken in fairly high doses, and requires the supervision of a trained health care professional. One of its benefits seems to be that it might reduce sugar cravings, possibly by inhibiting the sweet-taste sensors in the tongue (??)
Garcinia cambogia (hydroxycitrate) is widely touted as being able to prevent glucose from being converted to body fat. Again, this has been demonstrated in the lab setting, but no studies on humans have shown it to be effective for either reducing body fat, or for weight loss. That being said, there are testimonial reports that hydroxycitrate may have some appetite suppressant effects.
Chromium is a mineral which plays a role in insulin production and function. It's often called "glucose tolerance factor" or GTF. However, it also has NOT been shown to enhance weight loss, fat-burning or lowered blood sugar in any human study.
Chitosan is derived from the shells of crustaceans - shrimp, crayfish, etc.... It is supposed to bind with fat in the digestive tract, thus preventing absorption; there are claims also that it can reduce blood cholesterol levels. From what I could read, chitosan MAY be able to do what it claims in the lab setting, but the dose required is very high, and supplements only provide a fraction of the effective amount. Caution is advised for those with allergies to shellfish. Recent studies in Britain have shown no weight loss or lowered cholesterol levels from taking chitosan.
====================================================
Checking around the lowcarb message boards, a few folks have had "positive" experiences with these, but most found them not worth the money. And a lot of uncomfortable gas, bloating, gas, diarrhea and GAS ...
The whole notion of being able to eat pasta, potatoes, carbs, and sugary desserts goes against the principle of a lowcarb WOE or WOL. If you want to eat all kind of carby foods every day, then you are not lowcarbing. Some of the more experienced lowcarbers felt the products were vaguely helpful for occasional carb splurges, such as a wedding or holiday celebration. The general consensus is that the lowcarb diet itself should be the mode relied on for weight loss.
It's worth noting also that the carbs these pills are supposed to block are complex starches only. Not sugar, not highly refined, quickly digested starch such as white flour or white rice. Kind of defeats the purpose, I think.
This is just my opinion, of course, but seems to me the only thing getting slim here, is yer wallet.
hope this is helpful,
Doreen
[Edited by doreen T on 04-02-01 at 16:55]