Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Wed, Aug-15-12, 02:28
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 26,753
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/153/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 109%
Location: UK
Default Yo-Yo Dieting Does Not Thwart Weight Loss Efforts or Alter Metabolism Long Term

Quote:
From Science Daily
August 14, 2012

Yo-Yo Dieting Does Not Thwart Weight Loss Efforts or Alter Metabolism Long Term, Study Finds

Yo-yo dieting -- the repetitive loss and regain of body weight, also called weight cycling -- is prevalent in the Western world, affecting an estimated 10 percent to 40 percent of the population. The degree to which weight cycling may impact metabolism or thwart a person's ability to lose weight in the long run has been unclear -- until now.

A new study by researchers at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, published online in the journal Metabolism, for the first time has shown that a history of yo-yo dieting does not negatively affect metabolism or the ability to lose weight long term.

"A history of unsuccessful weight loss should not dissuade an individual from future attempts to shed pounds or diminish the role of a healthy diet and regular physical activity in successful weight management," said the study's senior author Anne McTiernan, M.D., Ph.D., a member of the Hutchinson Center's Public Health Sciences Division.

Two-thirds of the U.S. population is currently overweight or obese and it is estimated that nearly half of American women are currently dieting to lose weight. Obesity is a known risk factor for many cancers as well as heart disease and diabetes. A relationship between body fat and the production of certain hormones and inflammatory markers is thought to contribute to increased cancer risk.

"We know there's an association between obesity, sedentary behavior and increased risk of certain cancers," McTiernan said. "The World Health Organization estimates that a quarter to a third of cancers could be prevented with maintenance of normal weight and keeping a physically active lifestyle."

The study was based on data from 439 overweight-to-obese, sedentary Seattle-area women, ages 50 to 75, who were randomly assigned to one of four groups: reduced-calorie diet only, exercise only (mainly brisk walking), reduced-calorie diet plus exercise and a control group that received no intervention. At the end of the yearlong study, participants on the diet-only and diet-plus-exercise arms lost an average of 10 percent of their starting weight, which was the goal of the intervention.

The analysis aimed to determine whether women with a history of moderate or severe weight cycling were at a disadvantage compared to non-weight-cyclers when it came to losing weight. Of the study participants overall, 18 percent (77 women) met the criteria for severe weight cycling (having reported losing 20 or more pounds on three or more occasions) and 24 percent (103 women) met the criteria for moderate weight cycling (having reported losing 10 or more pounds on three or more occasions).

Although severe weight cyclers were, on average, nearly 20 pounds heavier than non-cyclers at the start of the study, at the end of the study the researchers found no significant differences between those who yo-yo dieted and those who didn't with regard to the ability to successfully participate in diet and/or exercise programs. The cyclers also did not differ from the non-cyclers with regard to the impact of diet or diet-plus-exercise on weight loss, percentage of body fat and lean muscle mass gained or lost. Other physiological factors such as blood pressure, insulin sensitivity, and blood concentrations of hormones such as leptin (which helps make one feel full) and adiponectin (which helps regulate glucose levels) also did not differ significantly among those whose weight fluctuated and those whose did not.

These finding may represent a first in the scientific community. "To our knowledge, no previous studies have examined the effect of prior weight cycling on the body composition, metabolic and hormonal changes induced by a comprehensive lifestyle intervention in free-living women," the authors wrote.

The National Institutes of Health, the National Cancer Institute and the Canadian Institutes of Health funded the research. The study also included investigators at Harvard Medical School, the National Cancer Institute and the University of Washington.

Journal Reference:
Caitlin Mason, Karen E. Foster-Schubert, Ikuyo Imayama, Liren Xiao, Angela Kong, Kristin L. Campbell, Catherine R. Duggan, Ching-Yun Wang, Catherine M. Alfano, Cornelia M. Ulrich, George L. Blackburn, Anne McTiernan. History of weight cycling does not impede future weight loss or metabolic improvements in postmenopausal women. Metabolism, 2012; DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2012.06.012
http://www.sciencedaily.com/release...20814213252.htm
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Wed, Aug-15-12, 03:23
jmh's Avatar
jmh jmh is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 480
 
Plan: my own
Stats: 224/182/165 Female 175cm
BF:
Progress: 71%
Location: Was in London, now in NZ
Default

This in itself is an interesting point:

Quote:
Although severe weight cyclers were, on average, nearly 20 pounds heavier than non-cyclers at the start of the study,


I seem to remember another new study showing that dieters experienced a permanent lowering of metabolism.
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Wed, Aug-15-12, 08:20
kindke's Avatar
kindke kindke is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 451
 
Plan: my own
Stats: 278/217/185 Male 5 feet 11 inches
BF:
Progress: 66%
Default

OH how I wish this was true, but my own personal experience says otherwise
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Wed, Aug-15-12, 08:41
lovemyvet's Avatar
lovemyvet lovemyvet is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 455
 
Plan: whole foods
Stats: 280/166/167 Female 64 inches
BF:
Progress: 101%
Location: So CA
Default

i say "bunk" LOL

i question the study's definition of "severe" weight cycling as losing 20 pounds or more 3 or more times. in what world are they living? that sounds more like most women walking down the street.

i'm not clear that they even addressed lowered metabolic rate?
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Wed, Aug-15-12, 09:00
bkloots's Avatar
bkloots bkloots is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 10,151
 
Plan: LC--Atkins
Stats: 195/160/150 Female 62in
BF:
Progress: 78%
Location: Kansas City, MO
Default

One more mystery of weight management not fully resolved.

As a typical yo-yo since adolescence, I've lost 10, 20, 30, 50 lbs at various times on various diets, including "cut the starches," Stillman, Weight Watchers, low-fat/low-calorie, and major exercise. Finally, Atkins. Atkins (or low-carb in general) is, I believe, the key to my particular body, tastes, and maintenance results. But I still have lapses, and continue to yo-yo to a certain extent, although not (thanks to low-carb) without hope.

Aging and activity/exercise levels are probably important factors in the continuing challenge of weight maintenance. Sometimes I find all this tiresome, but I would never use "it's hopeless" as an excuse to quit trying.

Quote:
"A history of unsuccessful weight loss should not dissuade an individual from future attempts to shed pounds or diminish the role of a healthy diet and regular physical activity in successful weight management," said the study's senior author Anne McTiernan, M.D., Ph.D., a member of the Hutchinson Center's Public Health Sciences Division.


Yes to this. I don't know what the upper limit of my weight gain might be if I didn't take control. My highest weight of 192 (in 1996--age 50) was not by any means a point of homeostasis. I would have continued to accumulate fat. Without mindful dietary management and exercise, I would by now (age 66) be looking at the possibility of Type 2 diabetes, joint injuries, liver disease, and failing mental abilities (I mean, more than I have!)

I say hooray for yo-yo dieting. The alternative is appalling.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:26.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.