The second brain in our stomachs : LC Research/Media Forum : Active Low-Carber Forums

#1 ^

Wed, Jul-11-12, 01:32

Demi

Strong Girls Rock!

Posts: 26,729

Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/153/160 Female 5'10"

BF:
Progress: 109%

Location: UK

The second brain in our stomachs

Not low carb per se, but I thought others here might find it an interesting read:

Quote:

From BBC Online
London, UK
11 July, 2012

The second brain in our stomachs

by Michael Mosley

Our own stomachs may be something of a dark mystery to most of us, but new research is revealing the surprising ways in which our guts exert control over our mood and appetite.

Not many of us get the chance to watch our own stomach's digestion in action.

But along with an audience at London's Science Museum, I recently watched live pictures from my own stomach as the porridge I had eaten for breakfast was churned, broken up, exposed to acid and then pushed out into my small intestine as a creamy mush called chyme.

I had swallowed a miniature camera in the form of a pill that would spend the day travelling through my digestive system, projecting images onto a giant screen.

Its first stop was my stomach, whose complex work is under the control of what's sometimes called "the little brain", a network of neurons that line your stomach and your gut.

Surprisingly, there are over 100 million of these cells in your gut, as many as there are in the head of a cat.

The little brain does not do a lot of complex thinking but it does get on with the essential daily grind involved in digesting food - lots of mixing, contracting and absorbing, to help break down our food and begin extracting the nutrients and vitamins we need.

And all those neurons lining our digestive system allow it to keep in close contact with the brain in your skull, via the vagus nerves, which often influence our emotional state.

For instance when we experience "butterflies in the stomach", this really is the brain in the stomach talking to the brain in your head. As we get nervous or fearful, blood gets diverted from our gut to our muscles and this is the stomach's way of protesting.

Hunger hormones

To accommodate a big meal your stomach has to expand from the size of a fist to around 2 litres. That's a 40-fold increase.

We used to think that stretch receptors in the stomach told the brain when the stomach was full, time to stop eating. But it turns out that the hunger signals produced by your stomach are far more sophisticated than that.

Understanding that has helped doctors treat father of 4, Bob Lakhanpal, who had hardly ever felt full, no matter how much he ate. As a result he had grown to 20 stone.

Six years ago, at the age of 28, he had a heart attack. To help him lose weight, he was recently given gastric bypass operation.

Now, you might think that just reducing the size of the stomach would be enough to sort out Bob's problems, because the smaller the stomach the less you eat.

But that does not seem to be what happens according to his surgeon, Mr Ahmed Ahmed, at London's Charing Cross Hospital.

"The modern thinking is that by doing the surgery you're producing changes in various hormones, chemical messengers which affect hunger levels and fullness levels, which in turn cause the weight loss.

"Bob's gastric bypass surgery separated off and isolated the part of his stomach which produces most ghrelin, a hormone which appears to play a key role in making you feel hungry." The hope was that this would result in a permanent fall in production of ghrelin.

His new shrunken stomach was then attached further down his small intestine, to a section known as the ileum which secretes a different gut hormone, PYY, which is responsible for making you feel full.

When we eat, it normally takes 20 minutes for food to get from the stomach to the ileum, causing the release of PYY and the message to the brain, "I'm full".

That is why it is better to eat slowly, to give the stomach a chance to tell the brain you have had enough before you overeat.

With his ileum so much nearer his stomach, Bob's brain now gets that message much quicker.

Six weeks after his operation, he had already lost three stone.

"These days I only have to eat a small amount of food and I feel full - I'm happy with that and I can stick with that. Family's happy, I'm happy, can't wait to lose more weight."

Gastric bypass is only available for more extreme cases but there is now intense interest in developing drugs that mimic the actions of PYY.

We think that the brain rules our decision-making process but it's pretty clear from operations like this that our guts have a very profound effect on how we behave.

When you have a big meal, for example, and feel a desire to lie down, that's because about a third of your blood supply is being diverted to your guts to let them do their vital work.

Which is why, as you may have been told as a child, it's best not to do anything too vigorous till your body has had a chance to digest.

Michael Mosley presents Guts: The Strange and Mysterious World of the Human Stomach on BBC Four at 21:00 BST on Thursday 12 July or watch online afterwards via iPlayer at the above link (UK only).

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-18779997

Last edited by Demi : Wed, Jul-11-12 at 01:38.

Sponsored Links

#2 ^

Wed, Jul-11-12, 07:21

M Levac

Senior Member

Posts: 6,498

Plan: VLC, mostly meat
Stats: 202/200/165 Male 5' 7"

BF:
Progress: 5%

Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Quote:

Its first stop was my stomach, whose complex work is under the control of what's sometimes called "the little brain", a network of neurons that line your stomach and your gut.
...
"Bob's gastric bypass surgery separated off and isolated the part of his stomach which produces most ghrelin, a hormone which appears to play a key role in making you feel hungry." The hope was that this would result in a permanent fall in production of ghrelin.

His new shrunken stomach was then attached further down his small intestine, to a section known as the ileum which secretes a different gut hormone, PYY, which is responsible for making you feel full.

It sounds more to me that the stomach is an endocrine organ, not a "little brain". Fat tissue is also an endocrine organ that both secretes and responds to hormones and enzymes, and that's where the problem really is anyway. Come to think of it, the brain is also an endocrine organ because it secretes lots of hormones like GHRH, GnRH, dopamine, etc, which all affect in some way some other hormone that directly affects fat tissue like GH, testosterone, estrogen, etc. Yet the hormones themselves is but one side of the equation. The other side is how sensitive the various tissues - especially fat tissue either directly or by secondary effect like insulin resistance for example - are to those hormones.

Based on the explanation of how gastric bypass surgery works and on all the hormones cited above and how it all works to ultimately regulate fat tissue, it's doubtful that the source of the problem is mechanical at the stomach. It's even more doubtful that the solution would be mechanical as well. It's beyond doubtful that the problem is that the stomach is somehow incorrectly mechanically connected to begin with.

Gastric bypass surgery itself is merely further proof that the source of the problem is not mechanical, but hormonal. That's because the primary effect of gastric bypass surgery is not how much food we can eat - we could just eat small meals more often to compensate - but instead it's hormonal, by changing the effect food has on the various hormones secreted by the gut as food passes through it, or in this case as food bypasses part of it.

But then it brings up the question of nutritional adequacy that may be compromised by gastric bypass surgery. The problem is fat tissue grows bigger, and in doing so segregates energy which would otherwise feed us. Since this is regulated - or dis-regulated - by hormonal signals, what causes those hormonal signals to do so in the first place? Gastric bypass surgery already tells us that food is what affects the hormones secreted by the gut, so it's obvious to me that we should at that first for the cause of dis-regulation of hormonal signals that make fat tissue grow bigger. If we change how food affects the gut, but don't change the composition of this food, then we don't actually change the cause of the problem, and we may even exacerbate it further because now the hormonal signals tell us to eat less, so there's even less nutrition coming in. In effect, we're inducing a semi-starvation diet, which we already know is deficient and causes of kinds of nasties like emaciation and neurosis. But I guess if we take care of the neurosis by removing the deep constant hunger caused by a semi-starvation diet, emaciation won't seem so bad.

I get the impression that all this time the underlying problem is believed to be a lack of willpower. Yet I can't understand how this belief could persist when the arguments used to support it are made up of hormones and enzymes.

Last edited by M Levac : Wed, Jul-11-12 at 07:39.