Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members Calendar Mark Forums Read Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Mon, Jul-26-10, 05:44
Hutchinson's Avatar
Hutchinson Hutchinson is online now
Senior Member
Posts: 2,308
 
Plan: Dr Dahlqvist's
Stats: 205/152/160 Male 69
BF:
Progress: 118%
Default 30-Days of High Omega-6 Diet--Stiffens Arteries and Increases Belly Fat

30-Days of High Omega-6 Diet--Stiffens Arteries and Increases Belly Fat
Quote:
Case Study: 30-Days of High Omega-6 Diet--Stiffens Arteries and Increases Belly Fat
Bottom line: A daring journalist eats a high omega-6 diet for 30-days (think Super-Size Me), which results in stiffer arteries, lowered metabolism, and an increase in belly fat.
Background: Journalist and author, Susan Allport, sold Oprah magazine on the idea of a “super-size me ” version of eating a high omega-6 fat diet for 30 days. Bravely, she offered to be the human guinea pig. What makes Susan particularly valiant is that she was well aware of the health hazards of eating a high omega-6 diet, as it was the subject of her book, Queen of Fats.

Although Susan willingly subjected her body to a daily dietary omega-6 bombardment for 30-days and chronicled her omega odyssey, Oprah magazine decided not to publish it. Susan got paid for her efforts—but that wasn’t the point. Susan wanted to raise awareness of the harmful health effects of eating excess omega-6 fats, and so she approached me with her story.

I was impressed with Susan’s scientific diligence as you shall see in her methodology for a mere subject of n=1. This is an inspiring case study, which shows that it doesn’t take long for an omega-6 fat imbalance to effect health parameters.

Method:

The Diet. Susan’s high-omega-6 diet consisted of eating her usual foods and mainly switching to high omega-6 spreads and oils for one-month. For example, regular mayonnaise (made with soybean-oil) replaced canola-based mayo. Olive oil-based salad dressings were replaced with a mixture of safflower, sunflower, corn, and soybean oils. She also replaced her grass-fed dairy products with traditional dairy foods.

Fish was eaten at least twice weekly, because it is an American Heart Association (AHA) recommendation. (Notably, AHA also recommends using omega-6 oils ).

Scientists were recruited to evaluate the effect of eating a high omega-6 diet for 30-days, which included evaluations of fatty acid content of blood cells, body composition, and cardiovascular parameters.

Fatty Acid Analysis. Blood samples were analyzed for fatty acid content. Doug Bibus, MS, PhD, from the University of Minnesota, provided a home omega-3 kit for daily blood testing.

Metabolism and Cardiovascular Indices. Jeff Volek, RD, MS, PhD, an associate professor in the Human Performance Laboratory at the University of Connecticut, provided the following tests:

Body composition evaluation using a state-of-the-art dual-energy X-ray machine to determine the amount, and distribution, of fat and lean tissue.
Resting Metabolic Rate (RMR) was evaluated by measuring oxygen consumption for a 30-minute period. (Each liter of oxygen consumed, is the equivalent of about 5 calories.)
Flow-Mediated Vasodilation was measured, to evaluate vascular health.
Arterial Stiffness was measured by an ultrasound scan.
Results: The results were surprising for only a 30-day evaluation. Susan’s weight remained unchanged. But there were dramatic changes in her blood fatty acid composition, body fat, arterial function, and body mass composition. During the 30-day period, omega-6 fatty acid was significantly increased, while omega-3 fatty acid content was decreased, as shown in the three following charts:
http://images.quickblogcast.com/8/9...sSusan.jpg?a=73
These fatty acid blood changes also impacted the Omega-3 Index score, which is a blood-based risk factor for predicting heart disease risk. For heart health, the recommended Omega-3 Index is 8% or greater [1]. Susan’s baseline score of 8.3 decreased to 4.7% in just 30 days, as shown below:http://images.quickblogcast.com/8/9...rtData.jpg?a=69

While body weight remained the same, body fat increased in the abdominal area by nearly ½-pound. Fat was also increased in the trunk region, where notably, lean body mass decreased. Metabolic rate also decreased from 1367 to 1291 calories.

In just 30 days, brachial artery dilation dropped by 22%, a change much larger than the day-to-day variation of this test. The amplitude of this changed surprised everyone involved in this project. Susan’s arteries were also stiffer, as revealed by the ultrasound scan, which indicates blood vessels are less able to expand and contract.
Discussion: The fact that Susan’s body weight remained the same is important, because it indicates that Susan wasn’t overloading her omega-6 intake to the point of gaining weight, she only changed the type of fat she was eating.

It’s especially notable that although Susan ate fish at least twice weekly, her Omega-3 Index dropped significantly. This reinforces the notion that merely gobbling fish oil, or eating fish, will not overcome the problem of eating a high omega-6 fat diet.

Japanese researchers discovered a similar phenomenon and called it “Omega-6 Syndrome.” They were puzzled as to why Okinawan inhabitants experienced a sudden and marked rise in chronic health diseases. The answer, the scientists discovered, was Okinawans had inadvertently tripled their omega-6 intake [2] . Notably, just like Susan, the Okinawans were still eating fish, but it did not protect them from health problems, when eating a higher omega-6 fat diet.

Commentary: Unquestionably, a study with a subject of n=1, does not make for conclusive evidence. But given the surmounting studies indicating harmful effects from excess dietary omega-6 fats, this case study merits replication with a statistically significant sample size.

Today we eat oils that did not exist 100 years ago, like cottonseed and soybean oils, which are among the top sources of omega-6 fat. Prior to industrialization, no population has eaten the current high levels of omega-6 fat. While omega-6 fat is an essential nutrient (specifically linoleic acid), eating just two slices of whole wheat bread will provide what your body needs.

Over a decade ago, enough evidence existed to prompt scientists to recommend eating less omega-6 fats [3]. But there is still no public health policy to lower omega-6 to balanced levels of less than 3% of calories, (which is less than 7 grams/day, based on a 2000-calorie diet.) Americans currently eat double this amount.

Just last year AHA urged Americans to make omega-6 fats a part of heart-healthy eating [4], (also see What is the American Heart Association’s Agenda?)

Perhaps, awareness and change will come from public health's “war on obesity”. Earlier this month, the newswire service AFP, warned that eating the wrong mix of fats can cause obesity, and quoted the lead scientist, "Omega six is like a fat-producing bomb" [5]

If you would like to help bring awareness to this important public health issue, please feel free to post this article on your blogs and social media sites. Also, if you would like to read Susan's full story and access the data described here, (but in more detail), you will find it on Susan’s homepage (left column):

Omega-6 Me : The not-so-pretty results of a month-long, high omega-6 diet (doc 54.0KB)
Blood work from my high Omega-6 diet (excel 60.5KB)
Link to Resources
[1] The Omega-3 Index: a new risk factor for death from coronary heart disease? Prev Med. 2004 Jul;39(1):212-20 .

[2] Okuyama, H et al. Dietary fatty acids—the n-6/n-3 balance and chronic elderly diseases: excess linoleic acic and relative n-3 deficiency syndrome seen in Japan. (1997); 35(4):409-457 .

[3] Simopoulos AP, Leaf A, Salem Jr N.Workshop on the Essentiality of and Recommended Dietary Intakes for Omega-6 and Omega-3 Fatty Acids. 1999; 18: 487-489

[4] Omega-6 fatty acids: Make them a part of heart-healthy eating. DALLAS, Jan. 27, 2009.

[5] Hood, M. Omega imbalance can make obesity 'inheritable': study. (AFP) – Jul 16, 2010.

Copyright © 2010 by Evelyn Tribole, MS, RD Published at http://www.EvelynTribole.com

•Rights to Reproduce: As long as you leave it unchanged, you don’t charge for it, and you include the entire copyright statement, you may reproduce this article. Please let us know you have used it by sending a website link or an electronic copy to Etribole at gmail dot com.

DISCLAIMER: The information is intended to inform readers and is not intended to replace specific advice from a health care professional. Copyright 2010 Evelyn Tribole, MS, RD

Last edited by Hutchinson : Mon, Jul-26-10 at 06:26.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Mon, Jul-26-10, 10:00
KarenJ's Avatar
KarenJ KarenJ is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 993
 
Plan: tasty animals with butter
Stats: 150/115/110 Female 60"
BF:maintaining
Progress: 88%
Location: Northeastern Illinois
Default

That was an interesting little case study. I especially liked the link to the AHA's agenda (here ). The graph comparing olive oil to soybean oil is one of those things I've wanted to see for a long time- it's telling.

Quote:
No One is Suggesting the Elimination of Omega-6 Fat In 1999, there was enough scientific evidence to prompt scientists to recommend an upper limit for omega-6 fats, to no more than 6.7 grams per day [Simopoulos]. This ceiling is based on eating a maximum of 3% fat calories from omega-6 fat on a 2000 calorie diet. (Note, this is a similar level to the the Lyon Diet Heart study.) Now, ten years later, the American Heart Association is urging people to continue to eat more than double that amount. No scientist is urging for the elimination of omega-6 fats. Linoleic acid is the chief omega-6 fatty acid consumed by Americans and westernized countries, and it is essential but in small quantities. This is similar to the nutrient sodium, it's essential in small amounts, but in excess it's not good for your health. When the dietary omega-3 and omega-6 fats are in balance, it's truly a beautiful synergy in the body. But in excess, the omega-6 fatty acids are like overzealous fire-fighters, chopping down your door because of a chronic false fire alarm. Yes, we need fire departments and fire fighters, but if they destroy the very buildings they are trying to protect, it's a problem--akin to chronic inflammation in the body, which lies at the root of many diseases.


I don't know if "balance" is the correct word here, aren't we supposed to be aiming for a 2:1 ratio of o6 to o3? However, it's really interesting to see the ceiling of 6.7 grams per day. Apparently, I've been fretting over nothing.
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Mon, Jul-26-10, 17:34
Bexicon Bexicon is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 364
 
Plan: my own
Stats: 125/125/125 Female 5'7"
BF:
Progress:
Location: Toronto
Default

I think the O6 issue is a bit of a blind spot in low carbing. Eating a high fat, low carb diet containing a lot of poultry, eggs, mayo, frying in bacon grease or lard, using gobs of nut flours in place of grains, chowing down on pork rinds, etc. could give you an O6 intake well above that of a low fat vegan using the dreaded margarines and such.
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Mon, Jul-26-10, 17:58
Elihnig's Avatar
Elihnig Elihnig is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 4,126
 
Plan: Very Low Carb
Stats: 261/233/165 Female 70 inches
BF:
Progress: 29%
Location: Maine
Default

How's peanut oil and coconut oil in regards to Omega 6 and 3's?

Beth
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Mon, Jul-26-10, 18:53
NewRuth's Avatar
NewRuth NewRuth is offline
Gimme Bacon!
Posts: 2,037
 
Plan: General Low Carb
Stats: 000/000/000 Female 5'3"
BF:Irrelevant
Progress: 100%
Location: Heartland of the USA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bexicon
I think the O6 issue is a bit of a blind spot in low carbing. Eating a high fat, low carb diet containing a lot of poultry, eggs, mayo, frying in bacon grease or lard, using gobs of nut flours in place of grains, chowing down on pork rinds, etc. could give you an O6 intake well above that of a low fat vegan using the dreaded margarines and such.

I'm not so sure about that. Weight of the Evidence Blog posted information on that a while back -

http://weightoftheevidence.blogspot...od-sources.html

Here are the highlights -
Quote:
...

WHOLE FOOD SOURCES (per 100g)

Dairy

Cheddar cheese, natural
0.5g LA (n-6)
0.4g ALA (n-3)

Cream cheese, regular
0.8g LA (n-6)
0.5g ALA (n-3)

Gruyere cheese, regular
1.3g LA (n-6)
0.4g ALA (n-3)

American cheese, regular
0.6g LA (n-6)
0.3g ALA (n-3)

Heavy Cream, conventional, grain-fed cows
0.9g LA (n-6)
0.6g ALA (n-3)

Light Cream, conventional, grain-fed cows
0.5g LA (n-6)
0.3g ALA (n-3)

Sour Cream, conventional
0.4g LA (n-6)
0.3g ALA (n-3)

Milk, whole, conventional
0.1g LA (n-6)
0.1g ALA (n-3)

Yogurt, plain, whole milk, conventional
0.1g LA (n-6)
0.1g ALA (n-3)

Egg Yolks, conventional (100g = approximately 4 yolks)
2.6g LA (n-6)
0.05g ALA (n-3)

Egg Yolks, pastured or flaxseed included in diet
4.2g LA (n-6)
2.1g ALA (n-3)

Butter, conventional
2.73g LA (n-6)
0.32g ALA (n-3)

Butter, grass-fed organic
1.8g LA (n-6)
1.2g ALA (n-3)


Your conventional dairy, with the exception of butter, is pretty good in the 3/6 balance.

In any case, I'm willing to bet that low fat is worse off than high fat in most cases.

Quote:
Originally Posted by elhinig
How's peanut oil and coconut oil in regards to Omega 6 and 3's?

check out the link above. She has both of those listed.
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Mon, Jul-26-10, 19:36
Bexicon Bexicon is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 364
 
Plan: my own
Stats: 125/125/125 Female 5'7"
BF:
Progress:
Location: Toronto
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elihnig
How's peanut oil and coconut oil in regards to Omega 6 and 3's?

Beth
Coconut oil has a very high ratio of 6 to 3 but it's a good example of a food where the total percentage of PUFAs is so small the ratio is not really relevant. It has a really good profile overall, partly because of the level of saturated fat and medium chain fatty acids.

Nutritiondata.com has PUFAs in the charts for almost all the entries, you can find out how many grams of O3 and O6 are in most foods and you can guesstimate if their entry doesn't quite match the brand/cut/type of food you have. The ratio is one thing, the total amount of PUFAs is another thing... if you compare coconut oil to peanut oil you'll see what I mean.

With O6, if a person is eating huge amounts, it might make more sense to prioritize reducing that in preference to taking huge amounts of O3 to achieve a given ratio... and that also depends on your confidence level in O3 supplements if you take those. I think there are clear problems with consuming a lot of O6... it's not clear whether just using a ton of O3 as some sort of antidote has as much benefit as achieving that same ratio at a lower amount. Do you know what I'm saying?
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Mon, Jul-26-10, 20:15
KarenJ's Avatar
KarenJ KarenJ is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 993
 
Plan: tasty animals with butter
Stats: 150/115/110 Female 60"
BF:maintaining
Progress: 88%
Location: Northeastern Illinois
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bexicon
With O6, if a person is eating huge amounts, it might make more sense to prioritize reducing that in preference to taking huge amounts of O3 to achieve a given ratio... and that also depends on your confidence level in O3 supplements if you take those. I think there are clear problems with consuming a lot of O6... it's not clear whether just using a ton of O3 as some sort of antidote has as much benefit as achieving that same ratio at a lower amount. Do you know what I'm saying?


This whole thing has been very confusing to me. I don't use mayo very much, but when I do it's the Hellman's soybean oil and I make sure I take some Krill oil, too. So I am indeed using O3 as a type of antidote, trying to achieve the right ratio... but if more than 6.7 grams of O6 is considered problematic, is it necessary to chase a ratio rather than just limiting O6?

Quote:
Originally Posted by NewRuth
Egg Yolks, pastured or flaxseed included in diet 4.2g LA (n-6) 2.1g ALA (n-3)


Pastured eggs!
Reply With Quote
  #8   ^
Old Mon, Jul-26-10, 20:20
Bexicon Bexicon is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 364
 
Plan: my own
Stats: 125/125/125 Female 5'7"
BF:
Progress:
Location: Toronto
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NewRuth
I'm not so sure about that. Weight of the Evidence Blog posted information on that a while back -

http://weightoftheevidence.blogspot...od-sources.html

Here are the highlights -

Your conventional dairy, with the exception of butter, is pretty good in the 3/6 balance.

In any case, I'm willing to bet that low fat is worse off than high fat in most cases.


check out the link above. She has both of those listed.

Well, I'm not sure whether you see the point I'm trying to make. The concern over O6:O3 ratios/amounts is often attributed to the modern trend towards refined vegetable and seed oils replacing animal fats.

But I can hit about 10 grams of O6 just eating a plate of chicken thighs. Butter is the least of my problems. If I had bacon and eggs the same day as the chicken, whoa look out... considering I'd prefer to keep it < 5g, it's ironic it can be harder for me on low carb days than on the days I eat higher carb and low fat (when I eat more like a Kitavan.)

I'm not saying low carb is inherently high in O6 (it can be extremely low, if your meat is primarily fish and beef and your added fats are butter and coconut, for example) but it's not automatically lower than the SAD, either... low carbers eat more fat, period, so if they don't choose carefully, they can end up consuming a lot of O6, whether the ratio looks good or not.
Reply With Quote
  #9   ^
Old Mon, Jul-26-10, 20:42
Bexicon Bexicon is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 364
 
Plan: my own
Stats: 125/125/125 Female 5'7"
BF:
Progress:
Location: Toronto
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KarenJ
This whole thing has been very confusing to me. I don't use mayo very much, but when I do it's the Hellman's soybean oil and I make sure I take some Krill oil, too. So I am indeed using O3 as a type of antidote, trying to achieve the right ratio... but if more than 6.7 grams of O6 is considered problematic, is it necessary to chase a ratio rather than just limiting O6?



Pastured eggs!

Karen, I empathize with your confusion I mean, mayo and full-fat salad dressings are popular with low carbers but soybean oil is a fricking PUFA bomb, it's half PUFA and all of that is O6 ... 7 grams of O6 in a tablespoon. If somebody wasn't eating that crap before, and now does on a daily basis because it's part of eating healthier as a low-carber, well, like I said, I think it's a blind spot.
Reply With Quote
  #10   ^
Old Mon, Jul-26-10, 21:43
Nancy LC's Avatar
Nancy LC Nancy LC is online now
Posts: 30,453
 
Plan: Hedonic Paleo
Stats: 209.5/170.4/165 Female 5'8"
BF:
Progress: 88%
Location: San Diego, CA
Default

When you look at the total amount per 100g you can see even conventional meat is very low in O6.

Quote:
Beef, grain-fed, conventional
0.275g (n-6)
0.016g (n-3)


I don't think ratios are very meaningful. Gotta look at the total.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:00.


Copyright © 2000-2010 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.