
Thu, Nov-05-09, 06:25
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 2,055
|
|
Plan: Zero Carb All Meat
Stats: 202/165/165
BF:
Progress: 100%
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
|
|
Quote:
Two years of a low-fat diet had caused Rob's LDL particle number to skyrocket by 81%, nearly all due to an explosion of small LDL. Recall that small LDL is more susceptible to oxidation, more inflammation-provoking, more adhesive--the form of LDL particles most likely to cause heart disease.
Also, note that, despite the enormous increase in small LDL, HDL and triglycerides remained favorable. This counters the popular rule-of-thumb offered by some that small LDL is not present when HDL is "normal."
Low-fat diets as commonly practiced are enormously destructive. In Rob's case, a low-fat diet caused both calculated Friedewald LDL as well as LDL particle number to increase dramatically. In many other people, low-fat diets increase calculated Friedewald LDL modestly or not at all, but cause the more accurate LDL particle number to increase significantly, all due to small LDL.
I'm happy to say that, once Rob witnessed how far wrong he could go on the wrong program, he's back on Track. (Sorry, pun intended.) He has resumed his supplements and eliminated the food triggers of small LDL--wheat, cornstarch, and sugars.
|
Let me get this straight. A priori, the idea is that it's the cholesterol that causes heart disease. Or more precisely, the smaller LDL particles that are more adhesive, more inflammatory, more..., you get the picture. On the other hand, we freely acknowledge that what allows cholesterol to become causative, is the low fat diet. At what point did the diet disappear from the scope of "what's the cause of all this"? It didn't disappear, it just didn't fit the idea that it's the fat that causes heart disease. See, it's low fat, so it can't be the cause of heart disease. Here we are, acknowledging that this same low fat diet allowed this one man to grow sicker with heart disease over that two year period, yet we don't blame the diet, we blame the cholesterol particle size.
It's like trying to determine what caused the pain after smashing one's own thumb with a hammer. We look and we prod and we poke, to no avail. We just can't figure out what's the cause of all this pain. All the while still holding the hammer in the other hand. "It's obvious why you hurt, your thumb is all smashed up." "It's obvious why he's dead, he's got a hole in his head." This reminds me of something somebody said about somebody who forgot history who was doomed to repeat it. Or somebody who can't see the forest for the trees. Or somebody who mistakenly believe that the mechanism is the cause. Or some such.
It ain't the cholesterol, it's the diet. It ain't the bruise, it's the hammer. It ain't the hole, it's the bullet. That's the cause of all this. The cholesterol, the bruise, the hole, they're just telltales of what happened. It seems rather moronic to try to fix the problem by trying to hide the evidence of its existence. Or worse, by trying to dig a bigger hole.
My sarcasm meter just blew. I gotta get a new one.
|