Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > Low-Carb War Zone
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #76   ^
Old Tue, Jan-11-05, 12:46
doreen T's Avatar
doreen T doreen T is offline
Forum Founder
Posts: 37,229
 
Plan: LC paleo
Stats: 241/188/140 Female 165 cm
BF:
Progress: 52%
Location: Eastern ON, Canada
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nancy LC
Hmm... the USDA has beef liver at 1.3 mg per 100g RAW (vit C). Cooked is 1.9... hmmm. Lamb is 4mg. I'm beginning to doubt the raw liver, vit C thing. They must've gotten it from somewhere else......

From our nutrient data tool (carb counter), which is based on the latest USDA release 17 ... here are counts for other beef organ meats ..

- vit C in mg, per 100g cooked food (braised in liquid)..

- spleen: 50.3mg
- pancreas: 20.3mg
- lung: 32.7mg
- thymus: 30.2mg
- brain (raw): 16.6mg
- kidney(raw): 9.4mg

From the Canadian Nutrient File ... moose, caribou, beaver, muskrat, polar bear, whale, walrus and seal typically had 3-7mg vit C per 100g muscle meat. Vit C content tends to be proportionally higher in the organs and glands; unfortunately I couldn't find any data about those .. except for moose liver, which comes in at 22.6mg vit C per 100g cooked. Perhaps the further north one goes, the animals produce greater amounts of vit C? Just a guess though.

cheers,

Doreen
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #77   ^
Old Tue, Jan-11-05, 13:27
Nancy LC's Avatar
Nancy LC Nancy LC is offline
Experimenter
Posts: 25,865
 
Plan: DDF
Stats: 202/185.4/179 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 72%
Location: San Diego, CA
Default

Interesting Doreen! I gotta get more muskrat spleen in my diet!

I wouldn't think that the folks that are really far north would have rose hips. Probably any sort of greenery they'd get would have to be from roots.
Reply With Quote
  #78   ^
Old Tue, Jan-11-05, 15:36
Lisa N's Avatar
Lisa N Lisa N is offline
Posts: 12,028
 
Plan: Bernstein Diabetes Soluti
Stats: 260/-/145 Female 5' 3"
BF:
Progress: 63%
Location: Michigan
Default

Just for reference, 100 grams converts to 3.5 ounces.
It's also interesting to note that when Vitamin C is in short supply, the kidneys reabsorb it from the urine.
Reply With Quote
  #79   ^
Old Tue, Jan-11-05, 20:50
fatburner's Avatar
fatburner fatburner is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 151
 
Plan: low low carb
Stats: 142/146/148 Male 177
BF:?/?/22%
Progress: 67%
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Default

[QUOTE=Gee1]Eggs are no doubtedly good for you, but are they better then veggies, lets see:....


I'm a bit curious why you think that because some vegetables have more of certain vitamins and minerals than animal products, then they are a 'healthier' part of the human diet. I thought we were trying to establish wether animal products supplied ADEQUATE levels of all the known vitamins and minerals. The point is surely that many fruits and vegetables also contain glycemic carbs which the members of this forum are well on the way to discovering are the source of not only weight gain but most disease. This is not a competition about which foods win your 'gold medal' for particular vitamins and minerals, but which foods in combination contain adequate amounts of all of them and a minimal amount of the glycemic carbs which cause all the problems. The contributors to this thread have argued persuasively that an all animal products diet does this. It has also been pointed out that modern pollutants make the additional consumption of low glycemic vegetables and fruit a prudent improvement on an all animal product diet. I don't think any of the people here who accept that an all animal product diet can be really healthy are not choosing to eat large quantities of low glycemic fruit and vegetables because they add variety, taste and many antioxidants which help our bodies cope with the appalling toll of environmental pollution. I'm also hoping the real cause of the bleeding problems of the Inuit is clear to you now?

While I am the first to concede that an all animal diet would be pretty boring, perhaps the contributions to this thread are making you more comfortable with it being not only perfectly healthy in its own right, but more importantly much more healthy than any diet which includes glycemic carbs.
Reply With Quote
  #80   ^
Old Tue, Jan-11-05, 20:54
fatburner's Avatar
fatburner fatburner is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 151
 
Plan: low low carb
Stats: 142/146/148 Male 177
BF:?/?/22%
Progress: 67%
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Default

[QUOTE=dina1957]Fatburner:
You mixed kidney and liver. A cup of cooked kidney has only 1.33g of carbs, it's the liver that contains 10g.

Oops!
Reply With Quote
  #81   ^
Old Wed, Jan-12-05, 07:28
Gee1's Avatar
Gee1 Gee1 is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 41
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 181/181/143 Female 174cm
BF:
Progress: 0%
Location: London,UK
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fatburner
I'm a bit curious why you think that because some vegetables have more of certain vitamins and minerals than animal products, then they are a 'healthier' part of the human diet..


Becuase they rarely contain bacteria that can kill you,and unlike with meats, you don;t HAVE to cook them to be safe.You HAVE heard of a mad cow desease. Secondly, because meats contain saturated fat and veggies/fruits rarely do.Thirdly they do contain all the vit/min that meats do, are testier and more variable option,so in addition to the first two,I'd say,a BETTER and SAFER option.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fatburner
I thought we were trying to establish wether animal products supplied ADEQUATE levels of all the known vitamins and minerals. .


In a way. And we have seen that they don;t. But essentially this thread is about weather on Atkins, vegetables are a MUST or an OPTION.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fatburner
The point is surely that many fruits and vegetables also contain glycemic carbs which the members of this forum are well on the way to discovering are the source of not only weight gain but most disease. .


Which is why fruit is not allowed or allowed in limited quantities on Atkins. As for deseases, I dont think carbs can claim responsibility for MOST deseases. Some yes. Not most.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fatburner
This is not a competition about which foods win your 'gold medal' for particular vitamins and minerals,.


Not MY goldmedal. IT's gold medal. I don;t put vit and min into plants. And although this is not a competition true, this is nevertheless an important discussion which should enlighten and teach many about the quality of vegetables,cos many refuse to eat them and don;t realise their full importance. And since some people are suggesting that eating meat alone is perfectly healthy, now is also important for all to realise that this is in no way correct as we have seen it already, becuase it will only give an amunition to them not toeat veggies, and will suffer the consequences later in life. Just like Eskimos.So I am trying to help. What are you doing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by fatburner
but which foods in combination contain adequate amounts of all of them and a minimal amount of the glycemic carbs which cause all the problems. .


See, this is exactly where the people get confused. You think that just because meat is low-carb, is automatically perfectly OK to eat , and only meat!

So are the vegetables low carb. Why do you in this case then not consider vegeterian rather then Eskimo diet? Becuase on veggies alone you will be safer both carb-wise, bacteria-wise and vit/min wise.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fatburner
The contributors to this thread have argued persuasively that an all animal products diet does this..


Maybe you feel that way. I and many others are not persuaded. Cos you can;t argue the vit/min and you can;t argue the lack of bacteria in veggies.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fatburner
I'm also hoping the real cause of the bleeding problems of the Inuit is clear to you now?.


I should hope the same. It was clear to me when I wrote it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fatburner
While I am the first to concede that an all animal diet would be pretty boring, perhaps the contributions to this thread are making you more comfortable with it being not only perfectly healthy in its own right, but more importantly much more healthy than any diet which includes glycemic carbs.


Pefectly healthy? Mad cow desease? Strokes? Nosebleeds that can;t stop?Yeah...Right.

When you are talking about your "healthy" meat only diet, you keep forgetting to tell people that not only they ought to eat their meat raw to get half decent amount of its benefits, but also that the same raw meat will contain a huge amount of bacteria which can kill them. Now tell me, how come nobody here on your side mentioned bacteria in your ever so "healthy" diet? And how come nobody here mentioned the vitamin deficiencies on a meat only diet? YOU think you eat veggies as a CHOICE You eat them cos you NEED them.I got 2 words for you: Vitamin C.

Last edited by Gee1 : Wed, Jan-12-05 at 07:36.
Reply With Quote
  #82   ^
Old Wed, Jan-12-05, 10:33
Dodger's Avatar
Dodger Dodger is offline
Posts: 8,765
 
Plan: Paleoish/Keto
Stats: 225/167/175 Male 71.5 inches
BF:18%
Progress: 116%
Location: Longmont, Colorado
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gee1
Becuase they rarely contain bacteria that can kill you,and unlike with meats, you don;t HAVE to cook them to be safe.You HAVE heard of a mad cow desease. Secondly, because meats contain saturated fat and veggies/fruits rarely do.Thirdly they do contain all the vit/min that meats do, are testier and more variable option,so in addition to the first two,I'd say,a BETTER and SAFER option.
Gee1,

Only contaminated meats have bacteria that can kill you, just like contaminated vegetables have bacteria that can kill you. I have read numerous health articles that say that vegetables must be throughly washed before eating to remove bacteria and pesticide residue.

Mad cow disease is extremly rare. More people die from eating poisonous mushrooms each year than from mad cow.

Yes, meats have more saturated fats than most vegetables, but what does that have to do with what was being discussed?

Vegetables contain no vitamin B12. That vitamin only comes from meat sources.

Whether vegetables are tastier than meats is a personal preference. In my experience, most childern do not like to eat vegetables, but readily eat meat. I like my vegetables better if they have an animal based flavoring,; butter or cheese are my favorites.

Quote:
When you are talking about your "healthy" meat only diet, you keep forgetting to tell people that not only they ought to eat their meat raw to get half decent amount of its benefits, but also that the same raw meat will contain a huge amount of bacteria which can kill them. Now tell me, how come nobody here on your side mentioned bacteria in your ever so "healthy" diet? And how come nobody here mentioned the vitamin deficiencies on a meat only diet? YOU think you eat veggies as a CHOICE You eat them cos you NEED them.I got 2 words for you: Vitamin C.
I agree that over cooking meat can reduce its nutrient content, just like over cooking vegetables can reduce their nutrient content. Cooking meats, just like cooking vegetables can make some nutrients more absorbable.

There is no problem with bacteria in meat, unless it has been contaminated. Just like there is no problem with bacteria in vegetables, unless they have been contaminated. The contamination comes from the food handling/processing system and is due to human mistakes, not due to an intrinsic property of the meat or vegetable. Not all meat is contaminated, just like not all vegetables are contaminated.

I think that previous posts have put the rest the vitamin C controversy, but as a counter two words to you: vitamin B12.
Reply With Quote
  #83   ^
Old Wed, Jan-12-05, 12:54
potatofree's Avatar
potatofree potatofree is offline
Fully Caffeinated
Posts: 17,245
 
Plan: Back to Atkins
Stats: 298/228/160 Female 5ft9in
BF:?/35/?
Progress: 51%
Default

I was under the impression that cooking doesn't protect you from Mad Cow? E coli, yes... trichinosis, yes... but I've been told the organism responsible for BSE can't be destroyed by cooking.
Reply With Quote
  #84   ^
Old Wed, Jan-12-05, 12:55
LukeA's Avatar
LukeA LukeA is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,326
 
Plan: gluten free atkins maint.
Stats: 250/155/180 Male 6 foot 3 inches
BF:
Progress: 136%
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by potatofree
I was under the impression that cooking doesn't protect you from Mad Cow? E coli, yes... trichinosis, yes... but I've been told the organism responsible for BSE can't be destroyed by cooking.



Yes, you are correct.
Reply With Quote
  #85   ^
Old Wed, Jan-12-05, 13:47
Nancy LC's Avatar
Nancy LC Nancy LC is offline
Experimenter
Posts: 25,865
 
Plan: DDF
Stats: 202/185.4/179 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 72%
Location: San Diego, CA
Default

While I think veggies are healthy and wonderful, I do grow them in cow shit, so I don't know exactly how bacteria free they are.
Reply With Quote
  #86   ^
Old Wed, Jan-12-05, 15:19
dina1957 dina1957 is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 1,854
 
Plan: My own
Stats: 194/000/150 Female 5'5"
BF:Not sure
Progress: 441%
Location: Bay Area
Default

We can contract E-coli from anything that comes into contact with animal feces, because it's where the E-coli resides. While it doesn't bother animals, it can be deadly to humans. The problem with the meat processing that if can contaminate the meat surafce if the animal bowel gets panctured. But it's enough to cook large peaces of beef for internal temperature of 145 for 3 minutes, it will destroy E-Coli. The only probelm is with undercooked hamburger meat, when the surface gets mixed with internal part. There is another concern of eating undercooked or raw meat besides E-Coli, it's parasites.
http://www.kt.iger.bbsrc.ac.uk/FACT...0files/kt37.pdfIn order to destroy them , the meat should be cooked all the way through until well done. I try to avoid eating meat roasted at a high temperature, fried and BBQd , so I like to brase or stew beef or lamb on a low temperature. This works best with cuts like short ribs, shanks, rather than a steak. But then we are getting parts close to bone marrow and spinal cord. This is where we should be concern about getting BSE aka mad cow desease since it mostly affects brain and spinal cord of the animal. The causing protein like agent is not destroyed by heating, even at a higher temperature. So, while beef is a great source of B12, there is enough of B12 in dairy (milk and yougurt) and eggs. WE can also get vegetables and fruits contaminated with E-coli if they are not washed (especially strawberry and lettuce ) properly. In modern agriculture when organic produce is rather a gimmick, it's all about feeedom of choice: pesticides or E-Coli, PCB and mercury or growth hormones and BSE . Not much left to eat, if you think about it. While we can avoid contaminated veggies and fruits by simply washing them thorough, it's hard to avoid mad cow desease. Until ADA will start to sample every slautered cow and sheep, no one is safe. But it does not mean that I don't eat beef and lamb, I just buy grass fed from a local farm and cook it thorough. I also think that vegetables and fruits are far more safer choice than meat.

Last edited by dina1957 : Wed, Jan-12-05 at 15:33.
Reply With Quote
  #87   ^
Old Wed, Jan-12-05, 15:24
newlcer's Avatar
newlcer newlcer is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,396
 
Plan: Atkins/LCHF
Stats: 225/185/175 Female 5 feet 9 inches
BF:Really High!!
Progress: 80%
Location: Toronto, Ontario Canada
Default

I vote for veggies, too! In fact, DD and I just discovered Boston Leaf Lettuce Wraps...amazingly good! You don't miss the bread at all!!!
Cath
Reply With Quote
  #88   ^
Old Wed, Jan-12-05, 15:56
Lisa N's Avatar
Lisa N Lisa N is offline
Posts: 12,028
 
Plan: Bernstein Diabetes Soluti
Stats: 260/-/145 Female 5' 3"
BF:
Progress: 63%
Location: Michigan
Default

Quote:
Becuase they rarely contain bacteria that can kill you,and unlike with meats, you don;t HAVE to cook them to be safe.


Not true, Gee. Salad bars are a common source of food poisoning (often the lettuce or mushrooms are the culprit). E Coli can be present on vegetables as well as on meat and vegetables are often treated with pesticides and can harbor parasites as well. Unwashed raw veggies are not as benign as you think, so if you're going to eat your veggies raw, best to wash them first.
Improperly canned vegetables can contain Clostridium Botulinum (botulism), which can be deadly.

Quote:
fruit is not allowed or allowed in limited quantities on Atkins.


Technically, not so. Sweet fruits are limited, but the non-sweet fruits such as olives, avocados, peppers, cucumbers and tomatoes are allowed even during induction.

Quote:
Secondly, because meats contain saturated fat and veggies/fruits rarely do.


And the problem with saturated fats (on a low carb plan) would be...?
Reply With Quote
  #89   ^
Old Wed, Jan-12-05, 20:41
mio1996's Avatar
mio1996 mio1996 is offline
Glutton for Grease!
Posts: 1,338
 
Plan: Primal-VLC
Stats: 295/190/190 Male 76
BF:don't/really/care
Progress: 100%
Location: Clemson, SC
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by potatofree
I was under the impression that cooking doesn't protect you from Mad Cow? E coli, yes... trichinosis, yes... but I've been told the organism responsible for BSE can't be destroyed by cooking.


You are correct, potatofree. As a matter of fact, even chemicals cannot destroy it. I read a study where brain electrodes from the brain of an infected chimp were sterilized with both formaldehyde and fire, then were locked away for an extended period of time. The electrodes were then inserted into the brain of another chimp, which then contracted the disease.

It's not actually even considered an organism that causes mad cow, it is a mutant protein (I think it is called a prion).
Reply With Quote
  #90   ^
Old Wed, Jan-12-05, 21:26
potatofree's Avatar
potatofree potatofree is offline
Fully Caffeinated
Posts: 17,245
 
Plan: Back to Atkins
Stats: 298/228/160 Female 5ft9in
BF:?/35/?
Progress: 51%
Default

I didn't know what it was called either.... "organism" sounded better than "Cootie" or "yucky thing" though.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 22:25.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.