Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Exercise Forums: Active Low-Carbers > Advanced/High Intensity
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Wed, Jul-14-04, 06:43
tagcaver's Avatar
tagcaver tagcaver is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 787
 
Plan: Lyle Style FD
Stats: 143/124.5/123 Female 5 ft 4 in
BF:24.8%
Progress: 93%
Location: Huntsville, AL
Default At what rate can muscle be gained?

I've been reading lots of posts on the Atkins forum that have the general theme of "I'm stalled, been eating what I should and exercising, still not losing...". Usually the replies to these threads are "If you're exercising you've probably gained muscle while losing fat -- take your measurements." Usually these complaints and replies happen after only a week or two without any weight loss. It seems to me to be not enough time to gain any measureable amount of muscle.

I've always been under the impression that it takes about 12 weeks to start seeing a difference for a beginner, doing a gereral cardio and weight routine 3 times a week at a gym. I would think that when someone who isn't doing really intense workouts is in a 2-3 week "stall" without losing the expected 3-6 lbs, that it would be unlikely that this much fat could be replaced with an equal mass of muscle.


But I could be wrong. So my question is, exactly how fast can muscle be gained? For example, if someone is doing just general exercise, exactly how many pounds of muscle can they gain in a week?


This has been bugging me for a while now. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Wed, Jul-14-04, 08:41
KathyD's Avatar
KathyD KathyD is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 576
 
Plan: Carb Cycle
Stats: 185/155/140 Female 5'5
BF:
Progress: 67%
Location: New York
Default

Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Wed, Jul-14-04, 09:00
fridayeyes's Avatar
fridayeyes fridayeyes is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,044
 
Plan: low glycemic
Stats: // Female jkl
BF:
Progress: 69%
Default

Muscle gain varies greatly depending on the person and the level of exercise. Even two or three weeks of halfway decent cardio will produce some muscle changes and perhaps a small muscle gain - maybe a pound or two. For people who have never done resistance training (weight-lifting) and hit it whole hog, the gains can be over a pound per week. With moderate exercise programs, most people will notice performance gains within two weeks and shape changes within 4.

cheers,

Friday
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Wed, Jul-14-04, 11:58
mps's Avatar
mps mps is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 392
 
Plan: NHE/UD2/General LC
Stats: 175/175/175 Male 6'
BF:10/6/?
Progress:
Location: Michigan
Default

Quote from the linked article above:
"For example, someone who weighs 180 pounds might expect to gain an extra four, six, maybe even nine pounds of lean muscle over a six-week period."
So here we are talking about a pound/week. And I believe this can happen, especially when someone is just starting out (as long as their workout plan and diet is good).
But from there, to continue to gain like this, it's much more 'tricky'.

Quote from article:
"Remember, you won't gain weight at this rate forever. Over the course of a year, it's rare to gain more than 25 pounds of muscle. Sure, you might gain more than 25 pounds of weight. But, unless you're using drugs, gaining this much lean muscle in one year or less is very hard to do."

No kidding!! if I gained just 5 pounds/ YEAR since I started... I should be (doing the math...) 225 pounds ripped to shreds!! Ok, I'm not.
In my experiance muscle gains come MUCH slower over time. However, gaining SIZE has not been my main goal. If I ate like a pig and did'nt care about fat at all I'm sure I'd have more muscle... but I'd also have more fat.

Also... I believe the BFL'ers can build a lot of muscle quickly (as shown by their before and after pics) But I would suggest it is because they are changing their program and makeing an effort to achieve a goal in a fixed (short) amount of time. This may put them in the same category as a person just starting out... simply because the plan is different. It's like the Hawthorn effect... a change produces results... then it tappers off.

As someone said... I don't remember who... the Hawthorn effect is not a bad thing... You just need lots of them.
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Wed, Jul-14-04, 12:38
legwarmers's Avatar
legwarmers legwarmers is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 353
 
Plan: NHE
Stats: 135/133/140 Female 64"
BF:15%
Progress: -40%
Default

the statistic for muscle growth for women (not including newbie phenomenon) that i've always been quoted says that the average woman should only expect to see a max of 5lbs of growth a year.

that makes sense to me.

only female genetic marvels that i know can gain 1lb of mass per week. natural male athletes can apparently do this with a lot of hard work, though.
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Wed, Jul-14-04, 12:43
Built's Avatar
Built Built is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 3,661
 
Plan: Metabolic Surge
Stats: 170/139/? Female 5'8"
BF:
Progress: 100%
Location: Canada's Wet Coast
Default

This has been my experience as well, and that's only been by ditching almost ALL cardio and REALLY focussing on intense, heavy lifting with plenty of protein in my diet and strategic carb snacks.

My first year, I MIGHT have put on 8-10 pounds of muscle. I THINK I managed another 5 last year. I MIGHT have put on 3 since January this year. I THINK. And I've been REALLY working at it HARD. It's REALLY slow.

I only ever lost muscle doing cardio.
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Wed, Jul-14-04, 12:46
liftnlady's Avatar
liftnlady liftnlady is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 821
 
Plan: hi prot/carb/cal cycling
Stats: 138.5/133.5/120 Female 64 inches
BF:20%
Progress: 27%
Location: San francisco
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by legwarmers
the statistic for muscle growth for women (not including newbie phenomenon) that i've always been quoted says that the average woman should only expect to see a max of 5lbs of growth a year.

that makes sense to me.

only female genetic marvels that i know can gain 1lb of mass per week. natural male athletes can apparently do this with a lot of hard work, though.


ditto this....it has taken me about 2 years to add maybe 5-10 lbs of muscle. Rarely can muscle be added in a caloric deficit you need an excess of calories, most women I know are opposed to gaining weight and therefore do not reap the benefits as much. Also, never heard of cardio adding muscle...might help harden the existing area..but cardio is catabolic not anabolic.
Reply With Quote
  #8   ^
Old Wed, Jul-14-04, 13:02
legwarmers's Avatar
legwarmers legwarmers is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 353
 
Plan: NHE
Stats: 135/133/140 Female 64"
BF:15%
Progress: -40%
Default

agreed LL.

MOST women won't eat enough to see gains. that shocks me, but it shouldn't really.

cardio... totally agreed. if i do too much i turn into a stick.
Reply With Quote
  #9   ^
Old Wed, Jul-14-04, 13:04
Built's Avatar
Built Built is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 3,661
 
Plan: Metabolic Surge
Stats: 170/139/? Female 5'8"
BF:
Progress: 100%
Location: Canada's Wet Coast
Default

Quote:
cardio... totally agreed. if i do too much i turn into a stick.


And I just get squishy
Reply With Quote
  #10   ^
Old Wed, Jul-14-04, 13:11
jonthepa jonthepa is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 87
 
Plan: just low carb
Stats: 238/211/190 Male 74 inches
BF:
Progress: 56%
Location: Fort Mill, SC
Default

New body builders tend to develop muscle fairly quickly. However muscle growth slows after about one year. I believe it is possible to gain 5-7 lbs of muscle per year afterward with excellent diet and training. However I do believe there is a limit to the size, and by that I mean muscle mass, that each individual will allow itself to get. The trick is finding out what that size is; and most of us will take forever to find that out.
Reply With Quote
  #11   ^
Old Wed, Jul-14-04, 13:15
Built's Avatar
Built Built is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 3,661
 
Plan: Metabolic Surge
Stats: 170/139/? Female 5'8"
BF:
Progress: 100%
Location: Canada's Wet Coast
Default

Hey Jon - you talking boy-gains, or girl-gains?
Reply With Quote
  #12   ^
Old Wed, Jul-14-04, 13:20
jonthepa jonthepa is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 87
 
Plan: just low carb
Stats: 238/211/190 Male 74 inches
BF:
Progress: 56%
Location: Fort Mill, SC
Default

Sorry, I was meaning boy gains. With less endogenous androgens, ladies will probably gain less (I mean just lean muscle), but I don't know for sure. However, I do know that 5lbs of muscle on someone 5 foot 4 looks a helluva lot different on someone 6 foot 3.
Reply With Quote
  #13   ^
Old Wed, Jul-14-04, 13:42
tagcaver's Avatar
tagcaver tagcaver is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 787
 
Plan: Lyle Style FD
Stats: 143/124.5/123 Female 5 ft 4 in
BF:24.8%
Progress: 93%
Location: Huntsville, AL
Default

This is great information. Thanks. So, I guess that when posters complain about not losing anything for 2-3 weeks or maybe even go up a bit, that telling them that they've probably gained muscle mass (if they're exercising in any form, that is) is not realistic.

I've always been skeptical.

Guess they should be referred to this forum instead.
Reply With Quote
  #14   ^
Old Wed, Jul-14-04, 13:47
Built's Avatar
Built Built is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 3,661
 
Plan: Metabolic Surge
Stats: 170/139/? Female 5'8"
BF:
Progress: 100%
Location: Canada's Wet Coast
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonthepa
Sorry, I was meaning boy gains. With less endogenous androgens, ladies will probably gain less (I mean just lean muscle), but I don't know for sure. However, I do know that 5lbs of muscle on someone 5 foot 4 looks a helluva lot different on someone 6 foot 3.

Thanks for the clarification Jon

Reply With Quote
  #15   ^
Old Wed, Jul-14-04, 14:21
adukart adukart is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,308
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 180/179.8/130 Female 5'4.75"
BF:
Progress: 0%
Location: ND
Default

Built or anyone,

Isn't it true though that your muscle may hold on to water initially so one could be gaining some type of water weight when they start exercising? That explanation is way over simplified so if you could explain what I am talking about that would help too, that is only IF you know what I am talking about. I believe you stated something to that affect in this thread: http://forum.lowcarber.org/showthread.php?t=186007

Which was also the first time I met you .
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[CKD] Losing muscle... serrelind Specific Exercise Plans 23 Fri, May-14-04 14:57
muscle spasms???? (long I'm afraid) lasert Newbies' Questions 14 Fri, Dec-12-03 18:06
12 Reasons every adult should strength train RodeRash Beginner/Low Intensity 0 Wed, Apr-09-03 16:09
Bodybuilding/workout terminology Trainerdan Advanced/High Intensity 0 Mon, Jan-07-02 16:23
Metabolic Rate and Weight Regain in Dieters tamarian LC Research/Media 3 Tue, Nov-14-00 13:19


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:13.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.