Quote:
I just don't think they would still be on the market if they had serious side effects.
|
ROFLMAO!!!
TRANS-FATS SHOULDN'T BE ON THE MARKET EITHER!
In fact they're illegal in Europe--have been for several years, I understand. Pressure from (certainly not the manufacturers) various groups finally convinced the FDA to have them pulled from the market, but not until 2008. Alot can happen B4 then, including the FDA changing its mind, and a lot more people dying. The manufacturer of Nutrasweet knew that it caused brain damage (killed brain cells in vitro) B4 it was approved. Do you think that this scholarly knowledge has ceased to exist since then?? Scholarly research is rarely, if ever done for pure altruism--unless the doctoral candidate and/or college professor is independently wealthy. Only
funded research projects get scholarly blessings and approval. Even Dr. Atkins had to knuckle under to the
scholarly establishment to get positive
scholarly attention focused on what he had been observing in his practice--by creating a "non-profit foundation" to pony up the funds for some
scholarly research on the subject. And where do you suppose the major
scholarly funding comes from (to prove or disprove the hypothesis that, for example, Nutrasweet is a health hazard)? If you guessed manufacturers and/or foundations with an agenda, then you'd be correct. What if the results aren't what was planned or expected? Just about
any research can be written (or re-written) to minimize, or even bury unpleasant findings. Why do you think that the tobacco companies were able to
PROVE through
scholarly research that cigarettes were at worst benign, and at best actually
good for you for so many years, even when, by their own belated admission, they knew the real facts from their own privately funded studies since at least 1949? Do you honestly believe that the major food companies are less unscrupulous that Big Tobacco was?
Yes anyone can put anything on the net. And in books. There are still active members of the Flat Earth Society too. And ostriches (of the avian
and human variety) still put their heads in the sand when they don't want to believe in the danger surrounding them. Contrary to common public opinion, the FDA is NOT on the side of the consumer. If they were, they would never have knuckled under to Big-Ag and adopted the Food Pyramid to replace the "4 basic food groups" (that incidentally, though probably outdated, at least kept our parents and grandparents
thinner and healthier than the Pyramid has done for us).