Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members Calendar Mark Forums Read Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Fri, Apr-13-07, 03:18
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 17,668
 
Plan: LC Maintenance
Stats: 215/147/150 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 105%
Location: UK
Default Obesity fuelled by cheaper food

Have just come across this interesting article

BBC News Online
London, UK
Originally published: 31 March, 2007



Obesity fuelled by cheaper food

In the third of his series on global food markets, BBC World Affairs Correspondent Mark Doyle gets into a 'Bod Pod' to investigate how modern eating habits are making many of us fat.

I regretted suggesting a visit to an obesity clinic almost as soon as the words had left my lips.

But my colleague, BBC producer Ed Butler, immediately seized upon it as an excellent way of illustrating the increasingly important issue of global obesity.

So I found myself at Addenbrooke's Hospital, in the east of England, in the company of Dr Nick Finer, a senior medical consultant on obesity.

Dr Finer told me to take my shoes off and clamber inside a sort of sealed air chamber called a 'Bod Pod'.

"You just climb in there, Mark, and I'll be able to measure how much of your body is fat."

I climbed in; the machine started whirring away.

It was around eight years ago that the number of overweight people in the world began exceeding the number of underweight people - many of them seriously undernourished.

The figures switched because, contrary to popular prejudice, it's not just Americans and Belgians who now tend to be fat.

Citizens of the developing world - from Mexico, for example, Egypt and South Africa - are also tipping the scales as overweight.

Poverty reduced

"Since the turn of the century," said Barry Popkin, Professor of Nutrition at the University of North Carolina, "we've seen big reductions in poverty, particularly in India and China."

"So we've had large reductions in the number of people who are underweight. At the same time we've had far faster increases in the numbers of those overweight."

"In every country in the world, the rate of increase in the number becoming overweight and obese has accelerated."

"So today we have reached a point where we have, depending on the estimates, between 1.3bn and 1.6bn overweight people in the world, but fewer, between 700m and 800m, who are underweight."

The reasons why more people than ever before are putting on weight are, on the face of it, simple enough; they eat too many fatty or sweet foods, and don't do enough exercise.

Least healthy

But behind that truism are several complex processes.

Barry Popkin says the way we have organised agriculture is a key factor:

"Over the past century we have worked very hard to produce cheap beef. The global price of beef has gone down to about a quarter of its cost in the 1950s.

"This makes it that much easier for poor people to consume beef, and the same has occurred for edible oils and sugars."

"These products are the least healthy in terms of producing diabetes, cancer and obesity."

In contrast to meat, oils and sugars, Professor Popkin concludes, "We have in global budgetary terms probably invested one thousandth of 1% in encouraging the consumption of fruit and vegetables."

Back at the controls of 'Bod Pod', Dr Nick Finer was doing calculations about my body mass. Since I know I am a little overweight I wasn't overly keen to get the results.

So I tried to distract him with some questions about why we often eat food that is not good for us.

Inappropriate messages

"In the past, when we were hunter-gatherers, our bodies were programmed to eat what we could when we could," said Dr Finer. "We needed to store food because we didn't know where the next meal would come from."

But now that agriculture has delivered plenty, the messages our brains give to our bodies may no longer be appropriate.

"The human brain is very good at telling us we are hungry and need food. But the problem now is that there is always plenty available and the brain is not so good at telling us we have had enough."

Pursuing my diversionary tactics further, I asked Dr Finer if that meant human beings were therefore predisposed to getting ever fatter and fatter.

"In a world of ever-expanding food supply", replied Dr Finer, "and where we don't expend enough energy through exercise, the answer to that is 'Yes'."


Then he told me my body was about 35% fat when it should, ideally, be between 25% and 28% fat. So there was no escaping my result.

And the world may not ultimately be able to escape the consequences of the patterns of consumption we have come to demand.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/6495889.stm


In the same series:
Tiny island with a global warning
The limits of a Green Revolution?

Click on any of the following for more information and to listen to the broadcast:
Part One: Growing Pains
Part Two: The Taste of Excess
Part Three: The Future Test
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Fri, Apr-13-07, 08:34
Nancy LC's Avatar
Nancy LC Nancy LC is online now
Senior Member
Posts: 28,340
 
Plan: Hedonic Paleo
Stats: 209.5/170.4/165 Female 5'8"
BF:
Progress: 88%
Location: San Diego, CA
Default

Quote:
"Over the past century we have worked very hard to produce cheap beef. The global price of beef has gone down to about a quarter of its cost in the 1950s.

"This makes it that much easier for poor people to consume beef, and the same has occurred for edible oils and sugars."


And once again, they overlook the incredibly obvious. It's grains that are the cheapest food in the world and in amazing abundance.
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Fri, Apr-13-07, 09:05
Angeline's Avatar
Angeline Angeline is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,423
 
Plan: Atkins (loosely)
Stats: -/-/- Female 60
BF:
Progress: 40%
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Default

Frustrating isn't it? They make a good point, about how cheap food is part of the obesity epidemic. Food now takes a much smaller part of your budget than it did 100 year ago. And that also allowed restaurants and the food industry to offer larger and larger portions.

But for God's sake, pointing the finger at beef is incredibly dull witted. And lumping sugar with beef? Gimme a break. I hardly think people are getting fact because they are eating too much beef. Do they have statistics to prove this? No, they just pull statements out of their ~ss. What kind of journalistic standard is that?
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Fri, Apr-13-07, 15:30
Voo36's Avatar
Voo36 Voo36 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,937
 
Plan: Low Carb Intuitive Eating
Stats: 289.0/247.6/199 Female 71 inches
BF:
Progress: 46%
Location: Hueytown, AL
Default

Along with that cheap beef.. $1 double cheeseburgers from McD's comes about 30 grams of carbs from the bun and ketchup. I think it's a fairly safe bet to say that beef isnt the problem, but rather all the side items and dishes we surround it with when we make unwise choices?
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Fri, Apr-13-07, 21:09
teaser teaser is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 528
 
Plan: Modified Pritikin
Stats: 190/167/160 Male 68 inches
BF:
Progress: 77%
Default

"We have in global budgetary terms probably invested one thousandth of 1% in encouraging the consumption of fruit and vegetables."

Maybe what little was spent in encouraging the consumption of fruit and vegetables was just spent less wastefully than usual by governments? Anyone here who doesn't know that their government wants them to eat five to ten servings of vegetables or fruit a day? (or some similar number outside of Canada)

If you really want to save money but eat healthy, the old standby of avoiding the middle aisles works pretty good.

I think its a good thing that people don't have to work as hard to avoid starving to death.
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Sat, Apr-14-07, 20:57
Rachel1 Rachel1 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,419
 
Plan: Atkins/IF
Stats: 12/06/04 Female 5' 1.5
BF:
Progress: 75%
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
Default

Considering that a good number of the world's overweight people are vegetarians for religious reasons (I'm thinking India), pointing the finger at beef doesn't cut it for me either.

But I agree that having fewer people outright starving really is a good thing.

Rachel
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Sun, Apr-15-07, 08:37
Atrsy's Avatar
Atrsy Atrsy is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,704
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 050/029/000 Female 5ft, 8 1/2 inches
BF:
Progress: 42%
Location: Pennsylvania
Default

I think the key to this is that people have more money. Let's face it, eating highly processed foods is a much more expensive way to eat. It used to be that poor people ate pasta and bread because it was cheap. But when you check the price of cereal, cookies, crackers, and processed foods, you will see that they are very expensive compared to vegetables and meat. Of course, the pasta is still cheap, but it is just flour and water so what are you getting for that money?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 14:44.


Copyright © 2000-2010 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.