Tue, Apr-11-06, 01:58
|
|
Registered Member
Posts: 44
|
|
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 336/313/150
BF:
Progress: 12%
Location: Pennsylvania
|
|
I remember that Dr. Atkins had a problem with aspertame (Nutrasweet) because it was totally synthetic. As for Splenda, I think he died before the research was in. He rallied around Splenda because, as he described it, it WAS sugar, but Sugar Alcohol, or a bi-product of Sugar (I read it in the Diet Revolution, but I don't have my copy at hand to quote from it). The problem is that the bi-product, sucralose, is on the scare list (you'll find plenty of websites that will give you this scare).
Now, if you believe in conspiracy theories and understand that the Sugar industry is sueing Splenda, and believe that the scare tactic is an aim against a product which threatens Sugar in a big way (more than aspertame)... you just might be on the right track.... OR, there really is (??) a problem with Splenda and those who use it are the human guinea pigs.
I've been a Sweet N Low user for ages now and have become used to it in my coffee. I need two Splenda's to equal the taste that 1 Sweet N Low gave me. The only aspertame I use is Crystal Light drink mix (but I am looking for non-sweetened products that I can add Stevia too - because Sweet N Low is just too bitter).
I didn't like Stevia when I first tried it either so I gave it away. I just ordered Stevia tablets, packets and powder. I figured... heck, I got used to Sweet N Low, I'll get used to Stevia... it will just take some time. Meanwhile, I'll at least know that I'm using something that's been around as a natural sweetener for more than 400 years and wasn't created in a lab... so maybe this way, I'll be able to adjust to it better.
|