Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #76   ^
Old Thu, Sep-24-09, 00:48
Scars Scars is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 231
 
Plan: Personalized
Stats: 190/178/170 Male 5'8"
BF:
Progress:
Default

Quote:
However, these two groups are identified not through actual energy intake but through actual weight change. In other words, they make the assumption that when a subject loses weight, he doesn't compensate, and when he doesn't lose weight, he compensates. In simpler terms, they don't know.

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #77   ^
Old Thu, Sep-24-09, 06:09
M Levac M Levac is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 6,498
 
Plan: VLC, mostly meat
Stats: 202/200/165 Male 5' 7"
BF:
Progress: 5%
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scars

But, but, you're the one who posted the links! I merely poked holes in them. Now you post a picture of guys moving a goal post, perhaps implying I'm changing my claims?!? But, but, I didn't make any claim, you did! You said that there isn't overcompensation or even compensation, and I merely pointed out that they don't actually know because they didn't measure. Yet they still acknowledge compensation by assumption. Basically, the data you provided is unreliable. There is no truth to be had from it.

You present data for us to peruse. We poke holes in it. You're not happy because your data is found lacking. You complain every which way. Huh hu.
Reply With Quote
  #78   ^
Old Thu, Sep-24-09, 13:44
Scars Scars is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 231
 
Plan: Personalized
Stats: 190/178/170 Male 5'8"
BF:
Progress:
Default

Quote:
I merely poked holes in them


Bwhahahahaha... making far-reaching and speculative claims about the studies is no "poking holes" its grasping for straws and yes, moving goalposts.

The argument that John Cloud makes is that exercise makes you hungry. I provided studies that show no additional hunger and/or compensation in response to exercise and you've provided.... nothing. I've already acknowledged that there are "compensators". Yes, some people DO in fact get hungry in response to exercise however this is not usually the case.
Reply With Quote
  #79   ^
Old Thu, Sep-24-09, 13:47
Scars Scars is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 231
 
Plan: Personalized
Stats: 190/178/170 Male 5'8"
BF:
Progress:
Default

Quote:
Basically, the data you provided is unreliable. There is no truth to be had from it.


Translation: It doesn't fit my belief system so I will ignore it.
Reply With Quote
  #80   ^
Old Thu, Sep-24-09, 22:22
M Levac M Levac is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 6,498
 
Plan: VLC, mostly meat
Stats: 202/200/165 Male 5' 7"
BF:
Progress: 5%
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scars
Yes, some people DO in fact get hungry in response to exercise however this is not usually the case.

In order to show that it's not "usually the case", you'd have to present every single paper ever published about the matter, or one paper which reviews all those papers. Do you know of such a paper? If not, then you make an unsupportable claim. Incidentally, I can make the opposite claim and get away with it just as easily. Here it is: Everybody usually grows more hungry following exercise. There, I said it. It is unequivocal and unambiguous. And there's nothing you can do about it. Why am I so cocky? Because, again, if you want to refute it, you must present every single paper ever published on the subject, or one paper which reviews all those papers.

Also, "usually the case" applies to things all humans have in common. Like a stomach, a mouth, and a brain. "usually the case" also applies to those organs' function. Like, growing hungry following exertion and eating according to hunger. I'd like you to try to refute this. But don't try too hard, or you just might work up an appetite in the process.
Reply With Quote
  #81   ^
Old Fri, Sep-25-09, 07:56
doctorK doctorK is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 126
 
Plan: Zone, IF
Stats: 220/170/160 Male 67 inches
BF:25%
Progress: 83%
Default

For me, what drove hunger was low blood sugar. After working out my blood sugar was low, I felt tired and craved carbs. But by working out 'smarter' not harder, I didn't drop blood sugar too low because I was using fat more than sugar. So both of you could be right: Exercise stimulates more eating and exercise stimulates less eating. :-)
Reply With Quote
  #82   ^
Old Fri, Sep-25-09, 08:27
cbcb's Avatar
cbcb cbcb is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 791
 
Plan: South Beach-esque
Stats: 194/159/140 Female 5'3"
BF:34% / 28% / 20%
Progress: 65%
Default

So how does one exercise just enough to gently boost glucagon but not exacerbate the other stuff? What about just low level aerobic activity after a high fat snack? Or what are some other ways to stimulate glucagon without exercise?
Reply With Quote
  #83   ^
Old Fri, Sep-25-09, 08:43
doctorK doctorK is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 126
 
Plan: Zone, IF
Stats: 220/170/160 Male 67 inches
BF:25%
Progress: 83%
Default

Using a heart rate monitor to stay within the fat-burning zone is what I was alluding to.
Reply With Quote
  #84   ^
Old Fri, Sep-25-09, 11:48
Nancy LC's Avatar
Nancy LC Nancy LC is offline
Experimenter
Posts: 25,863
 
Plan: DDF
Stats: 202/185.4/179 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 72%
Location: San Diego, CA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by doctorK
For me, what drove hunger was low blood sugar. After working out my blood sugar was low, I felt tired and craved carbs. But by working out 'smarter' not harder, I didn't drop blood sugar too low because I was using fat more than sugar. So both of you could be right: Exercise stimulates more eating and exercise stimulates less eating. :-)

Did you actually use a meter to get a reading? According to Dr. Eades, it isn't (usually) the fact that blood sugar is low but that it is dropping. So you could actually have rather high blood sugar and still feel hypoglycemic. In fact, this is very common in pre-diabetics and type 2 diabetics.

I used to get that too until I started keeping my carbs much, much lower.

Maybe if you opted for a lower carb diet you wouldn't feel that either. If I recall you were pretty high for a low carber.
Reply With Quote
  #85   ^
Old Fri, Sep-25-09, 16:44
doctorK doctorK is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 126
 
Plan: Zone, IF
Stats: 220/170/160 Male 67 inches
BF:25%
Progress: 83%
Default

No, I was going by how I felt. Too low blood sugar leaves me shaky and cold. A trainer put me on the treadmill for a stress test and determined where my best pace is for fatburning. It showed me that I was running too much too fast and not getting enough recovery rest. Slowing down has allowed my body to make better use of fat over carb. Carb is still necessary but not at the levels I used to eat.

Those two guys have been butting heads over this. I put my two cents in to show I've had it both ways: Gaining weight while running a lot and losing weight while running a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #86   ^
Old Fri, Sep-25-09, 19:59
capmikee's Avatar
capmikee capmikee is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 5,160
 
Plan: Weston A. Price, GFCF
Stats: 165/133/132 Male 5' 5"
BF:?/12.7%/?
Progress: 97%
Location: Philadelphia
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nancy LC
According to Dr. Eades, it isn't (usually) the fact that blood sugar is low but that it is dropping. So you could actually have rather high blood sugar and still feel hypoglycemic. In fact, this is very common in pre-diabetics and type 2 diabetics.

That's very interesting. I was checking my blood sugar a lot last year before I started IF. I could never find a strong correlation between BG and extreme crashes - maybe this explains it. On the other hand, I don't think my blood sugar varied much at all - it was always between 80 and 90 if I recall correctly.
Reply With Quote
  #87   ^
Old Fri, Sep-25-09, 21:20
cbcb's Avatar
cbcb cbcb is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 791
 
Plan: South Beach-esque
Stats: 194/159/140 Female 5'3"
BF:34% / 28% / 20%
Progress: 65%
Default

While we're here, any particular blood glucose meter you guys like?
Reply With Quote
  #88   ^
Old Sat, Sep-26-09, 19:37
Scars Scars is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 231
 
Plan: Personalized
Stats: 190/178/170 Male 5'8"
BF:
Progress:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by M Levac
In order to show that it's not "usually the case", you'd have to present every single paper ever published about the matter, or one paper which reviews all those papers. Do you know of such a paper? If not, then you make an unsupportable claim. Incidentally, I can make the opposite claim and get away with it just as easily. Here it is: Everybody usually grows more hungry following exercise. There, I said it. It is unequivocal and unambiguous. And there's nothing you can do about it. Why am I so cocky? Because, again, if you want to refute it, you must present every single paper ever published on the subject, or one paper which reviews all those papers.

Also, "usually the case" applies to things all humans have in common. Like a stomach, a mouth, and a brain. "usually the case" also applies to those organs' function. Like, growing hungry following exertion and eating according to hunger. I'd like you to try to refute this. But don't try too hard, or you just might work up an appetite in the process.


More red herrings...

I'm not sure what would satisfy you in terms of evidence Martin - short of testing everybody in the world. Do a pubmed search - the majority of studies show NO INCREASE IN APPETITE/SUBSEQUENT COMPENSATION IN RESPONSE TO EXERCISE. You clearly didn't bother to look at the literature I posted as on of the King et. al papers is in fact a review. Here are some clips from it;

"The relationship between exercise-induced energy deficits and food consumption has been subjected to much scrutiny, and the evidence suggests that there is no increase in hunger or energy intake as a result of an exercise-induced energy deficit (Reger et al. 1986; Reger & Alison, 1987; Thompson et al. 1988; Kissileff et al. 1990; King et al. 1994; King & Blundell, 1995)"

"Only one study has created energy deficits using both methods (food deprivation and exercise-induced) in a single study using the same individuals (Hubert el al. 1997). This study confirmed that the energy deficit created by food deprivation (meal omission) significantly increased hunger and energy intake, whereas the exercise-induced energy deficit did not."

"Many studies have shown that following a bout of intense exercise (> 60 % maximum O2 uptake) hunger is actually suppressed (Reger et al. 1986; Reger & Alison, 1987; Thompson et al. 1988; Kissileff et al. 1990; King et al. 1994; King & Blundell, 1995)"

Again Martin - show me a comparable quantity/quality of studies that show otherwise and then you will have a case. Until then, my contention stands: In most people, exercise DOES NOT INCREASE HUNGER.
Reply With Quote
  #89   ^
Old Sat, Sep-26-09, 19:43
Scars Scars is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 231
 
Plan: Personalized
Stats: 190/178/170 Male 5'8"
BF:
Progress:
Default

Here's the King paper that discusses the research on the issue.
http://journals.cambridge.org/downl...d1724b76fbc7feb
Reply With Quote
  #90   ^
Old Sat, Sep-26-09, 19:52
Scars Scars is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 231
 
Plan: Personalized
Stats: 190/178/170 Male 5'8"
BF:
Progress:
Default

If you are one of those people who do find that exercise makes you hungry - here are some ways to curb post workout hunger;

1. Eat intuitively and mindfully - especially after you exercise. Make an especially concerted effort to make good choices after your exercise session.

2. It may be more of a function of when you had your last meal. Try eating 30-60 min before a workout. This will help curb post-workout munchies. Tolerance levels will vary here.

3. Be sure you're eating adequate protein. Getting enough protein will help keep hunger at bay - especially in the peri-workout window.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 14:48.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.