Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Best Of
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Mark Forums Read Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Fri, May-24-02, 12:14
Natrushka Natrushka is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 11,512
 
Plan: IF +LC
Stats: 287/165/165 Female 66"
BF:
Progress: 100%
Question What is "low carb" ?

What makes a low carb plan "low carb"?

When we undertake a LC plan there are many different books available to us to choose from; have a look through the link "Which LC Plan is Right for Me?" on the right hand margin of every page for an idea.

What makes these plans LC? The restriction they place on carbohydrates? Can it be that simple? If it is, why are there so many variations. If tomorrow I stopped eating rice, corn and flour but changed no other dietary habits, would I have invented the "Nat LC Plan"?

Perhaps the question should be "What is LC". Is low carb simply eating less carbs? Is it just about diet?

What do you think the answer is?

Nat
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Fri, May-24-02, 12:37
slimchance's Avatar
slimchance slimchance is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 614
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 197/195/140 Female 65 inches
BF:
Progress: 4%
Location: new brunswick, canada
Default

Hi!

I think that it must be "lower than normal carb intake." The normal carb intake of most people in our society (especially here in NS) is way higher than any of the "low-carb" plans allow. The purpose of the plans (as I see it) is to find the carb level that allows one to lose weight and then to maintain it. I think that this is a very individual thing. Some people lose and maintain at 50g or higher, others at 20g.

Low-carb seems to be a restriction on carbs. If simply cutting out corn, flour and rice works for a person, then that seems to me to be a low-carb alternative for that person. Some people's diets may consist of mainly corn, flour and rice and that may be their problem area. Others may suffer from refined sugar addiction and simply cutting out corn, flour and rice may not be enough.

We are all individuals and all have our own eating styles and habits. I guess different plans were developed for different types of people...not to mention for making lots of money from selling the books!

I guess this is how I see it? Interesting question.

KC
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Fri, May-24-02, 12:49
tamarian's Avatar
tamarian tamarian is offline
Forum Founder
Posts: 19,570
 
Plan: Atkins/PP/BFL
Stats: 400/223/200 Male 5 ft 11
BF:37%/17%/12%
Progress: 89%
Location: Ottawa, ON
Default

I was really thinking about this for a while. What is high-carb? The traditional "healthy" diet is 70%C/15%P/15%F. Is low-carb anything lower than that?

Or a balanced diet, what's that? One third of each: Protein, Carbs and Fat? Above 33% is high, below 33% is low?

The percentage method is skewed depending on the caloric intake too. So is it by the grams count?

It seems like an impossible task, but who knows? Take a shot at your own definition.

Wa'il
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Fri, May-24-02, 15:24
TeriDoodle TeriDoodle is offline
Starting Over!
Posts: 3,435
 
Plan: Protein Power LifePlan
Stats: 182/178/150 Female 67 inches
BF:Jiggley mess
Progress: 13%
Location: Texas!!
Default

I consider it to be anything below 50g for weight loss and 100g/day for maintenance, only low-glycemic index carbs. I also think of it as any plan that doesn't require you to ever go below ~1500 cals/day so that the BMR isn't lowered.
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Fri, May-24-02, 16:16
LC Sponge LC Sponge is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,160
 
Plan: Atkins Maintenance
Stats: //2002
BF:and feeling great
Progress: 99%
Location: Ontario, along the Rideau
Default Re: What is "low carb" ?

Quote:
Originally posted by Natrushka
What makes a low carb plan "low carb"?

Nat


What makes these plans LC? The restriction they place on carbohydrates? Yes

Can it be that simple? Yes

If it is, why are there so many variations. Money. The diet industry is a multi billion dollar industry. Copycats appear anytime there is a place to make money. And it's not necessarily driven only by the authors and inventors and producers - but the publishers and investors as well. George Carlin once said "Nail 2 things together that have never been nailed together before, and some schmuck will buy it from you."

If tomorrow I stopped eating rice, corn and flour but changed no other dietary habits, would I have invented the "Nat LC Plan"? Yes, you could have and you still can. You can't copyright a recipe or any food combinations. You can only copyright what you invent. None of the low carb authors have invented a new food. Butter is not new.

Perhaps the question should be "What is LC". Is low carb simply eating less carbs? Is it just about diet? Low carb as a phrase, to me means only about diet. I eat low carb style. The program I followed was called "Atkins". I have incorporated low carb style eating into my lifestyle which I think of as simply "healthy" and well adjusted. No fanatical obsessions, lots of variety and good choices in exercise, spirituality, introspection, social activities, a good dose of elbow grease applied against anything worthy of my attention, and a bit of slap and tickle every once in a while. I can say that when I started out and well into my weight loss plan I focussed very much on being "a low carber" and using that phrase to represent the whole me. But since at goal, my focus has shifted to simply living life to its fullest just for me. I don't compete with anyone.

Good topic Nat. Are you taking up philosophy by chance?
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Fri, May-24-02, 18:05
Natrushka Natrushka is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 11,512
 
Plan: IF +LC
Stats: 287/165/165 Female 66"
BF:
Progress: 100%
Default Re: Re: What is "low carb" ?

Quote:
Originally posted by LC Sponge
Good topic Nat. Are you taking up philosophy by chance?


I'm thinking more "religion"

N
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Fri, May-24-02, 19:21
rustpot's Avatar
rustpot rustpot is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,110
 
Plan: atkins/protein power 1st
Stats: 269/278/210 Male 5 feet 10 ins.
BF:33%/30%/ ?
Progress: -15%
Location: Hertfordshire
Default What is LC?

Well, It is not low fat for sure. The problem is that we have three variables in our diet to play with; Protein, Carbohydrate and Fat. The majority of the processed foods available contain all three. High and low are all relative terms to what? Higher than each other or higher than an absolute value. Low carb could be the same as high protein or high fat.

For most LC plans LC is lower than an absolute value normally 20-40 carbs. But a personal carbohydrate level could be even higher and still within the low carb framework.

So for me Low carb is defined by what it isn't. It is not low calorie. It is not low fat. It is not low protein.

The fat is higher than the protein which is higher than the carbohydrate. So there is a hierachy as well.

There are no proprietary rights to the truth. The truth is in the carbohydrate/sugar/insulin/weight gain equation. I wish I could make some money by repackaging everything in a new bestseller.

The New Sugar Zone Power Flush for Life.
Reply With Quote
  #8   ^
Old Fri, May-24-02, 19:39
Natrushka Natrushka is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 11,512
 
Plan: IF +LC
Stats: 287/165/165 Female 66"
BF:
Progress: 100%
Default Re: What is LC?

Quote:
Originally posted by rustpot
So for me Low carb is defined by what it isn't. It is not low calorie. It is not low fat. It is not low protein.

The fat is higher than the protein which is higher than the carbohydrate. So there is a hierachy as well.


Well said, rustpot. As usual.

How about the Hierachical Plan?

Nat
Reply With Quote
  #9   ^
Old Fri, May-24-02, 21:21
razzle razzle is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,193
 
Plan: mostly paleo
Stats: //
BF:also don't care
Progress: 100%
Location: West Coast, USA
Default

Wellllll, I don't know! Moderate calorie, higher-fat, adequate protein, and carbs no higher than ?X? (120, which is a typical Zone number?) hmm. SP doesn't count LC veggies...so it's possible to eat 80 grams on her plan in a day even if you're only moderately active. well heck, but paleo doesn't limit carbs at all! you can have 14 bananas in a day on that (which would likely result in some darned odd digestive results, but would not result in our eliminating that plan from the board listings) Both the Zone and Dr. Berstein's Diabetic Solution have pretty low calorie levels.

Is insulin control the main object? That would allow CAD, the Zone, and probably paleo to fall under the definition, but barely. CAD allows really HC foods--chocolate cake and milk are fine on that plan. Not all plans are ketogenic, so that can't work.

Is the permanent way of eating a requirement? It seems that most of the programs end up in about the same place in maintenance phase (some retain permanent food restrictions, tho, in particular, the elimination of sugar in all forms)
Do healthy fats matter? Dr A seems to care not a bit about that. Neanderthin, SP and PPLP care a whole lot. (and doesn't the specific carb diet?)

I'm trying to figure it out a bit backwards, Nat. Looking at the programs we accept here as "LC," what are the commonalities...can that help us reach a definition?

Last edited by razzle : Fri, May-24-02 at 21:47.
Reply With Quote
  #10   ^
Old Fri, May-24-02, 21:43
Bloom Bloom is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,181
 
Plan: Dukan
Stats: 229/185/154 Female 168cm
BF:
Progress: 59%
Location: New Zealand
Default

I dont think the amount of protein or fat needs to change in ones diet for them to be eating LC.
If I was eating lets say 200 g carb daily, which would be considered 'normal' and lowered that to 50ecc g (which is what I had yesterday) that would be lowering my carbs to way below the general populous so therefore labelled LC.
If I am eating the right amount of protein recomended for my weight and lifestle and enough fat to provide the essentials needed, there is no need to change anything further.
I am not on a high/low fat diet or a high/low protein diet both I think should be adequate but for one to say they are eating LC that means in a nut shell they have cut the carbs back to considerably enough to be different than the norm. For health and satisfaction reasons we then also hopefully be sensible and choose our carbs from the most unrefined/natural and low glycemic factor as possible.
A person could though eat NO carbs all day and then have a spoon of sugar in hot chocolate at bedtime and still be LCing.
Just not a way I would recomend though. CAD is LC but i couldnt do it. The reward meal drove me to distraction.
I suppose it depends on how carb addicted you are and what your trigger foods are.
I get frustrated with the way some people ask me what i doing to lose weight and when i say Im LCing or on Atkins, they immediately start callingit a high protein diet. I didnt say that, I am not eating high protein (yesterday I had 78g) I am eating LC.
I eat between 10 and 12 x my lean body mass in calories a day. This is lower then many of you but I am happy with what I eat but minding the calories are not whats enabling me to be sucessful, its cutting out ALL the refined carbs and LCing so thats where I lay all the credit
Reply With Quote
  #11   ^
Old Fri, May-24-02, 21:48
Bloom Bloom is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,181
 
Plan: Dukan
Stats: 229/185/154 Female 168cm
BF:
Progress: 59%
Location: New Zealand
Default

Quote:
I can say that when I started out and well into my weight loss plan I focussed very much on being "a low carber" and using that phrase to represent the whole me. But since at goal, my focus has shifted to simply living life to its fullest just for me. I don't compete with anyone.
__________________
LC Sponge

"A man who has attained mastery of an art
reveals it in his every action."


Just had to comment on how well chosen your siggie is, fits in with your statement to a T
Reply With Quote
  #12   ^
Old Fri, Mar-07-03, 00:23
zandria72's Avatar
zandria72 zandria72 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,061
 
Plan: moderate - BFing
Stats: 247.5/195/150 Female 66 inches
BF:preg/curr/goal
Progress: 54%
Location: Muncie, IN
Default

I would not call CAD a low carb diet. It is about insulin control, but it is not low carb, IMO. Most LCers would cringe at the idea of eating what people on CAD can scarf down during their reward meal (or whatever they're calling it now). Many carbs can be consumed in that hour!

I think that the limits TeriDoodle proposed are about right. I'm not sure that I completely agree that the carbs have to be low GI. They *should* be, of course, but <100 g of carbs seems LC to me, regardless of their composition.
Reply With Quote
  #13   ^
Old Sun, Oct-19-03, 11:05
black57 black57 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 11,822
 
Plan: atkins/intermit. fasting
Stats: 166/136/135 Female 5'3''
BF:
Progress: 97%
Location: Orange, California
Default

Low carb is about reducing your carb intake. If you were to remove candy bars, ice cream, doughnuts etc from your diet, you will lose weight, if this is your primary source of carbs. However, you must have carbohydrates but not so many of them. Therefore look to nutritious, lc, vegetables and low carb fruits for your carb intake. There are many of them. You can reduce your carb intake by removing or reducing white flour, rice, potatoes if this is your primary source of carbohydrates. I have found that over-dosing on carbohydrates is the fat culprit not carbs themselves. If we learned to limit these things in our youth there would not have been the carbohydrate/obesity/diabetic problems that we see today.
Reply With Quote
  #14   ^
Old Mon, Dec-08-03, 09:46
Archie's Avatar
Archie Archie is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 518
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 236/202.5/159 Male 66
BF:
Progress: 44%
Location: Vancouver Island, B.C.
Default

I've never been crazy about the term Low Carb. I would, at the least prefer Dr Atkins term of "controlled carbs".
As we can see from this thread and by the many books out there each individual interprets LC slightly differently.
I guess the really question is "what are the commonalities amoungst these various interpretations?".
The first thing for me is "get rid of any refined sugars"
The second is "get rid of processed high glycemic index foods"

I believe if these two things didn't exist then the current epidemic of overweight people would not exist.
Of course now we need LC plans that go to more extreme lengths like reducing daily carbs to below 20 in order to get the weight we've gained off. Once it is off and for most of those who have it off following these two rules will likely keep it off.
Reply With Quote
  #15   ^
Old Mon, Dec-15-03, 21:54
black57 black57 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 11,822
 
Plan: atkins/intermit. fasting
Stats: 166/136/135 Female 5'3''
BF:
Progress: 97%
Location: Orange, California
Default

I was just thinking that even if one went as low as 100 grams of carbs per day that would be low carb. Considering 4 slices of some breads=100 grams of carbs.
To me if a diet addresses the carbohydrate issue with boldness and accuracy, it is low carb. Removing sweets and chips from my diet would make it low carb. I think I ate more Snicker Bars than potatoes or rice. As a matter of fact, cookies, chips and candy ends up going bad in our house now. Does that mean that I was the only one eating those things? Low carb is actually normal carb when we eat right.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Starbucks "low carb" berry muffins Mrs.E Canada 14 Tue, May-04-04 08:33
Pria "low carb" bars and Genisoy low carb crunch blue4lemon Atkins Diet 3 Tue, Apr-27-04 13:14
Down with carbohydrates! US "low carb" food fad on up. faywin LC Research/Media 1 Tue, Mar-30-04 18:45
What Does "Low Carb" Really Mean? ellemenno LC Research/Media 3 Fri, Feb-06-04 09:45
"Low carb" substitutes downscale Pre-Maintenance & Maintenance 10 Sat, Jan-24-04 10:45


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:07.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.