Not to argue with you, but you have to understand cholesterol level is one of the indicators. It is an effect produced by other factors in your body.
For example, blood sugar level is one of the indicators of many other diseases/symptoms/causes/results...
You eat lots of carbs or sugar affecting your blood sugar level.
My point is blood sugar level does not go up and down by itself.
Same as cholesterol level does not go up and down by itself.
Conclusion, human body is an extreme complex machine. Most people and scientists have not enough Big Data information to understand the whole picture. Most scientists have no multiple degrees/knowledge/fields/information... to connect all the dots.
So when some people say something based on the experiments they did or some statistic data they manipulated, I know some other experiments/research/statistic data say otherwise.
I always wonder why they not know?
Because the other information is not in their fields of knowledge/information...???
They just don't have knowledge/time to do Big Data???
They do not have background to understand the other fields of knowledge???
I am not writing books here and do not intend to quote all the journals/scientific articles here. I am telling you what I know. It is up to you to make your own sound judgment.
FYI, always ask the web sites quote their source of the information if you really care that information. If you do not understand the source of that information, ask someone to read them for you.
Below is a quote from the latest discovery related to this argument.
"...that targeting inflammation alone (as opposed to lowering blood cholesterol and other fats) could reduce the risk of heart attack."
http://fortune.com/2017/08/28/novar...cer-heart-risk/
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mayflowers
At locarb4avr - I know enough to know that cholesterol affecting health is better if its higher. I totally don't agree with you. You should visit www.dietdoctor.com and watch the videos siting studies on cholesterol and come up to the millennium
|