Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > Low-Carb War Zone
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #541   ^
Old Fri, Mar-10-06, 09:58
Frederick's Avatar
Frederick Frederick is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,512
 
Plan: Atkins - Maintenance
Stats: 185/150/150 Male 5' 10"
BF:
Progress: 100%
Location: Northern California
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by serrelind
I have seen several females that have passed through this forum that totally loath veggies. But I do notice that females, for the most part, seem to enjoy their veggies more than the guys do.


Could it be that men just have better taste in food? LOL

*joke* of course...

Caveat: No one with heightened sensibilities should be nor feel offended in the least. Inside joke for Serre.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #542   ^
Old Fri, Mar-10-06, 12:55
PaleoDeano's Avatar
PaleoDeano PaleoDeano is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 1,582
 
Plan: antivegan,was subzerocarb
Stats: 200/187/175 Male 6' 0"
BF:27%/19%/12%
Progress: 52%
Location: Flyover Zone
Default

Congratulations, Bear!

This has just become the most read thread ever on the Paleolithic & Neanderthin Sub-Forum! With over 14,000 views... and rapidly growing!

It was already the longest… by far! And now has 542 posts!

And, this all happened in less than two weeks!

There must be something to what is being said here!

Last edited by PaleoDeano : Fri, Mar-10-06 at 16:04.
Reply With Quote
  #543   ^
Old Fri, Mar-10-06, 12:57
LOOPS's Avatar
LOOPS LOOPS is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 3,225
 
Plan: LCHF
Stats: 74/76/67 Female 5ft 6.5 inches
BF:29/31/25
Progress: -29%
Location: LA SERENA, CHILE
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by theBear
Keto-adaptation on zero carbs should be complete in 3-4 weeks.

The truth about exercise is that muscles NEVER use carbs as fuel, only fat, so the process of 'burning carbs is only the process of converting them into fat, which puts a severe load on the body during exercise- eliminate the carbs and endurance skyrockets.

Rapid intense effort (anaerobic) uses ATP, which degrades with muscular contraction into ADP. ADP is reconverted into ATP by a mechanism fueled by fatty acids complexed with n-acetyl carnitine. No carbohydrate is involved. Aerobic activity is fueled the same way.


Hi Bear -

This hasn't really been my experience to tell the truth. I take tennis lessons and my coach pushes me really hard. What I found was, on very low carb (high fat) I have lots of endurance energy, but next to nothing to do lots of sprinting. Any 'fast' energy I had was used up in the first sprint and after that it was impossible to do any more. It wasn't low blood sugar either, as I still had lots of energy, just not to sprint. In the end I found I had to add in some extra carbs before training to compensate - I felt much better with this, and could sprint again. It didn't take much (maybe 20-30g carbs in the form of fruit).

Swimming and endurance running are different - you don't have to sprint repeatedly. I could quite happily jog/swim for hours just on fat/protein.

I wish it could work for me as eating very low carb does the rest of the time.
Reply With Quote
  #544   ^
Old Fri, Mar-10-06, 13:02
LOOPS's Avatar
LOOPS LOOPS is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 3,225
 
Plan: LCHF
Stats: 74/76/67 Female 5ft 6.5 inches
BF:29/31/25
Progress: -29%
Location: LA SERENA, CHILE
Default

I've been reading this thread, and wondering about the truth behind certain nutrients, especially vitamin C, E and especially magnesium. Looking into nutritiondata.com (I hope that's a reliable source) I noticed that if I put in a whole day's worth of just eating meat/fat, my numbers came out TERRIBLE for these 3 nutrients. I wonder why a pure carnivore would not need higher levels of these - especially something like magnesium which is very important for all kinds of things. Being a woman I take magnesium for TOM cramps and backache (which I haven't had this time round doing low-carb + Mg).
Reply With Quote
  #545   ^
Old Fri, Mar-10-06, 15:29
Bobi-p's Avatar
Bobi-p Bobi-p is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 628
 
Plan: VLC
Stats: 240/145/150 Female 69 inches
BF: 21%, HT: 69"
Progress: 106%
Location: Southern California
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MissSherry
My best friend, a female, dispises veggies. She may be rare (the females that dislike veggies).


I'm a female and much prefer meat, fish, eggs, butter, cheese and cream to veggies. I eat them if I can't ignore them, like if I'm at a dinner party, and the hostess has tried a "special recipe" with different spices! I don't want to hurt anyone's feelings. But I do notice that usually within 20-30 minutes after eating such things as broccoli, or salads I have to take a very quick bathroom break!
Reply With Quote
  #546   ^
Old Fri, Mar-10-06, 16:13
mae_west's Avatar
mae_west mae_west is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 426
 
Plan: keto/paleo with IF 18/6
Stats: 215.0/198.6/175 Female 68
BF:yes
Progress: 41%
Location: Kamloops, B.C. Canada
Default

I do like some vegetables, but mostly they are what could be considered "sweet" (?) like baby carrots or spagetti squash (yet I do not like yams or the so-called sweet potatoe...hmmmmm).

I like cauliflower steamed with cheese melted on, or made into that faux potatoe filling with sour cream, green onion, bacon and cheese. I do like asparagus with butter and lemon, but only when it is just in season and the stalks are thin and tender.

I used to buy the spring mix ( lots of leafy green) but only to get the oak leaf lettuce, which tastes nutty. The stuff I have been getting lately tastes quite bitter to me, so I have stopped buying it. And no need now that I am on meat and egg fast.
Reply With Quote
  #547   ^
Old Fri, Mar-10-06, 16:33
deirdra's Avatar
deirdra deirdra is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 4,328
 
Plan: vLC/GF,CF,SF
Stats: 197/136/150 Female 66 inches
BF:
Progress: 130%
Location: Alberta
Default

Loops, you'd get more nutrients if you gnawed on the bones & used them in stew. The problem with modern people is that they do not consume most of and use the entire animal, just a few select bits.
Reply With Quote
  #548   ^
Old Fri, Mar-10-06, 16:56
ItsTheWooo's Avatar
ItsTheWooo ItsTheWooo is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 4,815
 
Plan: My Own
Stats: 280/118/117.5 Female 5ft 5.25 in
BF:
Progress: 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LOOPS
Hi Bear -

This hasn't really been my experience to tell the truth. I take tennis lessons and my coach pushes me really hard. What I found was, on very low carb (high fat) I have lots of endurance energy, but next to nothing to do lots of sprinting. Any 'fast' energy I had was used up in the first sprint and after that it was impossible to do any more. It wasn't low blood sugar either, as I still had lots of energy, just not to sprint. In the end I found I had to add in some extra carbs before training to compensate - I felt much better with this, and could sprint again. It didn't take much (maybe 20-30g carbs in the form of fruit).

Swimming and endurance running are different - you don't have to sprint repeatedly. I could quite happily jog/swim for hours just on fat/protein.

I wish it could work for me as eating very low carb does the rest of the time.


Our muscles have fast and slow twitch fibers. Fast twitch fibers allow for sudden bursts of activity, such as sprinting, because they split ATP faster. They give us speed. Slow twitch fibers give us endurance and split ATP slower, like the names imply. Carbohydrate is important for speed, because it better fuels those particular muscle fibers. Carbohydrate replenishes glycogen which increases fuel availability to the fast twitch fibers.

http://www.indoorclimbing.com/muscles.html

This is why it is often said that sprinting, or lifting weights, or other "intense short burts" of activity tax sugar for energy, whereas slower endurance activities like walking burn fat better.

I have a tendency to hypoglycemia. I notice I become hypoglycemic very easily if I do a lot of upper body lifting, for example, much much more easily than if I walked for hours and hours. Walking all day will never give me a hypo. On the other hand, walking with a sack of books or heavy groceries? Almost always will.

At work (I am a cashier part time), if I lift too many jugs, I start to "shake" because this kind of activity uses a huge amount of sugar relative to fat. I come home at the end of the day and I am almost always shaking and low blood sugar. I am also often bloated at the end of my workday, which, I think has something to do with the hypoglycemia-inducing conditions (not sure what, but it has to be related... perhaps the constant raising of adrenal hormones is responsible?).
The absolute worst is when I have been sleep deprived for a few days, and then have work the next morning. The combination of all the lifting plus the metabolic state of sleep deprivation means my body just cannot possibly make enough sugar or energy to do what is demanded of it. In fact, I have taken to always having a liter of caffiene with me just so I have a way to keep my sugar level up, just so I can *function* at work. (God bless you diet pepsi, you wonder drug of sugar energy... a couple of swigs and I am like a whirlwhind for a short while).
Of course this results in horrible consequences of worse lethargy later on in th evening (and sometimes reaaally weird blood sugar/energy problems).

Walking, on the other hand, like I said it is far less likely to make me severely hypo (to the point where I shake, as in, a sudden dip). In fact, walking improves my fat metabolism tremendously, and, at the end of a long day of walking I can tell I am much more ketogenic. I am also almost always likely to lose water. Lifting a few heavy things is enough to make me "shaky" but if I walk from my house to the end of my city, not nearly as likely and my body burns fat more.

Endurance is all about fat and pro. Sudden, short, relatively intense activity is all about carbs. Moderate cardio, walking, etc = fats. Weight lifting = glycogen and carbs.

BTW the types of activity you do also determine how well your body uses certain fuels, and how capable you are of the activity. If you run, walk, or stand often you strengthen and increase the amount of slow twitch fibers, which means you gain endurance in those activities and can use fat for energy better. If you do a lot of lifting, sprinting, or other activities you improve your capacity to do these things, plus you increase how many carbs you can eat and tolerate (because you are constantly sucking your sugar low and using up glycogen that way).

That's why weight lifting has such a tremendous benefit for people with insulin resistance. It's the best way to improve how fast we clear out glucose and raises your need for sugar.

Last edited by ItsTheWooo : Fri, Mar-10-06 at 17:02.
Reply With Quote
  #549   ^
Old Fri, Mar-10-06, 18:45
LOOPS's Avatar
LOOPS LOOPS is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 3,225
 
Plan: LCHF
Stats: 74/76/67 Female 5ft 6.5 inches
BF:29/31/25
Progress: -29%
Location: LA SERENA, CHILE
Default

Hmm. But I thought thebear was saying how we really didn't need carbs at all, even for fast twitch muscle stuff. Then again I guess he doesn't play tennis.

What is interesting is I can actually make enough glucose it would seem to sprint say once every couple of minutes, but no more than that (without carbs).

It's not for lack of time either - I've been at this WOL for a fair few months (and before that too) - very low carb.
Reply With Quote
  #550   ^
Old Fri, Mar-10-06, 20:29
Ayustar's Avatar
Ayustar Ayustar is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,967
 
Plan: Human Experimentation
Stats: 170/100/105 Female 4'10
BF:
Progress: 108%
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Default

Well, I should propose an idea here....

Why don't we take some of us here who are already on the meat and egg fast or have been on it and have them do it for a month, very strict.

Then have someone who eats a more varied low carb diet and have them go on meat and egg and see what happens. I am game. I do the meat and egg fast almost exclusively, but sometimes I break and have vegetables and nuts, I try to stay away from peanuts but they are the devil, that is beside the point though.

What do you guys think? Do it for a month or so, very strict, no dairy other than butter? Whatever fats you like, mayo included?
Reply With Quote
  #551   ^
Old Fri, Mar-10-06, 20:41
Gstout's Avatar
Gstout Gstout is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 80
 
Plan: Steak & Beer
Stats: 212/193/165 Male 69 inches
BF:
Progress: 40%
Location: SouthEast USA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by serrelind
I have seen several females that have passed through this forum that totally loath veggies. But I do notice that females, for the most part, seem to enjoy their veggies more than the guys do.



Agreed, but don't you think thats a prime illustration of 'programming'?? Girls are 'trained' to be much social and if the 'gospel' is to eat veggies, then most of them will. Like or dislike really doesn't play into it, they're just being social and following the 'rules.' Nice girls.
Reply With Quote
  #552   ^
Old Fri, Mar-10-06, 20:49
Gstout's Avatar
Gstout Gstout is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 80
 
Plan: Steak & Beer
Stats: 212/193/165 Male 69 inches
BF:
Progress: 40%
Location: SouthEast USA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayustar
Well, I should propose an idea here....

Why don't we take some of us here who are already on the meat and egg fast or have been on it and have them do it for a month, very strict.

Then have someone who eats a more varied low carb diet and have them go on meat and egg and see what happens. I am game. I do the meat and egg fast almost exclusively, but sometimes I break and have vegetables and nuts, I try to stay away from peanuts but they are the devil, that is beside the point though.

What do you guys think? Do it for a month or so, very strict, no dairy other than butter? Whatever fats you like, mayo included?



I've got a jump then, I started 'very strict' less than 5 carbs/day last Saturday. I've noticed that I'm nuking my bacon less and less and less. I'll get to see the results in the morning - wish me luck. obtw, I completed 2 weeks of Atkins Induction just before I started this 5 a day thing. FWIW: I completed 72 miles of walking/jogging this week and averaged 1503 cals/day: 70% fat, 29% protein, 1% carb according to fitday. Also fitday says I burned an average of 3357 cals/day. I've averaged about 85 oz of water per day. I also started taking 1x 250mg L-Carnitine tab/day last Wednesday. If the fitday calculations are correct, I should have lost 3.6 lbs by tomorrow's weigh-in....
Reply With Quote
  #553   ^
Old Fri, Mar-10-06, 20:52
Gstout's Avatar
Gstout Gstout is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 80
 
Plan: Steak & Beer
Stats: 212/193/165 Male 69 inches
BF:
Progress: 40%
Location: SouthEast USA
Default TheBear what page was your IceCream recipe on?

TheBear what page was your IceCream recipe on? I hate to search through this again. Did anyone tab it???
Reply With Quote
  #554   ^
Old Fri, Mar-10-06, 21:01
ItsTheWooo's Avatar
ItsTheWooo ItsTheWooo is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 4,815
 
Plan: My Own
Stats: 280/118/117.5 Female 5ft 5.25 in
BF:
Progress: 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gstout
Agreed, but don't you think thats a prime illustration of 'programming'?? Girls are 'trained' to be much social and if the 'gospel' is to eat veggies, then most of them will. Like or dislike really doesn't play into it, they're just being social and following the 'rules.' Nice girls.


It has nothing to do with socialization. Veggies just taste good to me. The bitterness is not anymore overpowering or unpleasant than other pleasantly bitter foods like chocolate or good coffee with cream. Because I eat a natural diet I am not desensitized to taste; the subtle flavors and sweetness of veggies are very perceptable. For example, the "veggie fruits" like peppers, squashes, and tomatoes all have very rich vivid sweetness to me; I regard them the way a regular-diet person might regard high sugar fruit (as "sweet but not too sweet"). Even non-fruit veggies have very perceptable sweet tastes to me. For example, carrots and cabbage tastes very sweet, as does iceberg lettuce and peas.

I propose those who do not like veggies fall into two categories:
1) Very sensitive to bitter tastes/fibrous textures
2) Very desensitized to sweet tastes/smooth textures.

The reason most people don't like veggies is because they belong to group 2. They eat so many predigested starches, cookies and sodas that it takes a heaping spoonful of refined white stuff for their brains and tongues to register sweet. As a result, veggies taste bland or overly bitter (sweet taste being overactive means bitter taste of veggies registers relatively abnormally high).
Furthermore, because they eat so many "soft processed foods", the course and "real" texture of earthy food is unappealing to them. Processed food is over cooked, over processed, milled, cut really small, etc. They aren't used to really "eating their food" so the appearance and texture of a veggie puts them off.

Far less common is group 1... those who just by genetics have an abnormally high concentration of bitter taste bud receptors relative to sweet, or, are very tactile-sensitive and adverse to roughage in meals.

Perhaps there could be a biologically coded gender difference. Supposedly men prefer to eat the same things over and over. It is also conclusively proven females perceive sensations such as pain more vividly than men due to more nerve endings.
It might be possible women, as a gender, relatively perceive "more flavor" in veggies because our nervous system can better detect the subtle flavors and sweet taste that men cannot perceive. This also might be why men prefer to eat the same things over and over, and generally speaking, do not tend to be such pleasure eaters (I do notice women are more likely to eat for pleasure than men, who seem to just eat the same thing over and over without caring). It also might account for the reason women tend to favor sweet foods over meat foods; foods that are sweet typically have more flavors and sensations going on. Meat on the other hand does not and is much more "basic" (I believe it is called "umami taste"?). Nothing has a more basic flavor than plain protein. Lack of taste stimulation is probably a big reason the LC diet is so effective to control apetite (psychologically and physiologically).

Although, I love both veggies and meat. The one thing I can say I really do not care for are heavy, gummy starches like bagels and potatoes. I was born with a caveman's palate - meat , veggies. I liked sugar, of course, but I wasn't obsessed.
I loathed being forced to eat starches, hated sunday pasta night, hated those stupid big round zitis, hated rice, and ESPECIALLY potatoes and bread. I ate these things only because they were common, because I was encouraged to, because my mom thought they were healthy, and later on because I was becoming obese and thought if I ate those it was better than eating more meat and fat (which I LOVED). As I became fatter and more addicted to carbs and junkfood, I developed a taste for starches. I favored starches in a heirarchy of their ability to carry the flavor of sauce and meat, meaning, the more granulated = the better. The first starch I loved was cous cous (lots of butter please). After coos coos was rice, followed by fine grades of pasta (angel hair was my fav), then larger grades. I could not, and still cannot tolerate disgusting potatoes unless they are deep fried somehow, and thus, chemically saturated with fat.

Even today, I marvel at how people go gaga over sacks of dough (bagels), potatoes, and bread (that isn't infused with garlic, butter, herbs, peanut butter, berries, or other actual flavorful things). Some people actually just really like starch. I don't get it. It's like bland, chewy, flavorless gum. Blech.

Last edited by ItsTheWooo : Fri, Mar-10-06 at 21:10.
Reply With Quote
  #555   ^
Old Fri, Mar-10-06, 22:00
Paleoanth's Avatar
Paleoanth Paleoanth is offline
Slothy Superhero
Posts: 12,159
 
Plan: Vegetarian Atkins
Stats: 165/145/125 Female 60 inches
BF:29/25.2/24
Progress: 50%
Location: Tennessee/Iowa
Default

I am not disputing or addressing any of the benefits of your dietary regime to your health or well being. Personally, I think if it works for you, then do it. The ONLY thing I am going to address is some of the comments I have snipped below. That is because I am a paleoanthroplogist and what you have written here does not, in any way, agree with morphological, physiological, anatomical or genetic data.

Quote:
Originally Posted by theBear
At the risk of being repetitious:

Archeological digs into paleolithic people's homesites show zero evidence of fruit or any type of food vegetation residues, like seed, stems or skin. So any grazing of such foods occurred opportunistically and was done where found.


This is not true. By the way are you referring to Upper, Middle or Lower Paleolithic? There were huge cultural changes between these. At any rate, there has been evidence that may push cereal and grains back 10,000 years in the human diet. I am not saying this is good or bad, just that they are finding things:

http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/101/26/9551
http://www.thepaleodiet.com/articles/All%20letters.pdf

In Kalambo Falls, a site dated 200000 BP-they found nuts and seeds along with evidence of fire usage.



Quote:
Originally Posted by theBear
Our physiognomy is due to the development of speech, our mouths are only secondarily used to eat with- talking has preempted and ruled the size and shape of our mouths and oral cavities. The commonly heard and false contention that we have the organs and teeth of an omnivore are just crude vegetarian propaganda which is so wrong that a child without training should be able to demonstrate the fallacy of by comparing pictures.

Our intestinal structure and length is that of a carnivore- like a big cat, and nothing like an omnivore like the rat or pig.

Our teeth are pure carnivore, they have a continuous enamel coat, are quite sharp, erupt once and do not grow or get replaced just as is the norm for animal of insectivore lineage. They are utterly unlike the complex teeth of herbivores and omnivores- whose teeth grow throughout life.


While it is very true that speech has helped shape our brains, larynx position and even not being able to eat and breathe at the same time, our teeth are not at all like carnivores.

http://www.shsu.edu/~bio_mlt/Carnivor.html

We have spatulate incisors, small canines and low grinding molars. Nothing at all like carnivores who have small incisors, sharp long canines and often carnassial premolars. and I don't know what a "continuous enamel coat" means. However, the thickness of our enamel has shifted from thicker to thinner. A thicker enamel indicates a diet is or evolved from hard to chew foods that would wear down enamel-like nuts, seeds and grasses. THe earliest apes are like this as.

http://www.johnhawks.net/weblog/rev...s_enamel_2003.w
http://www.cast.uark.edu/local/icae...ngar/satalk.htm
http://comp.uark.edu/~pungar/ (this is just a cool microwear site)
http://people.umass.edu/dewar/resea...ster/index.html (micorwear from carnivores as a comparison)

Our intenstinal structure has a reduced cecum and is, indeed, evolutionarily adapted to digest meats. Our cecum reduced, partially, to free up calories that would have gone to a more specialized digestion to allow for bigger brain development. However, that did not mean that we gave up being dietary generalists in order to become pure carnivore. It does mean that we expanded our diets to include more high quality meat foods that were easier to digest. Gave us big brains. Very cool.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/vestiges/appendix.html
http://cas.bellarmine.edu/tietjen/i...g_the_brain.htm


Quote:
Originally Posted by theBear
We really don't have any very 'close' relatives- a term needing definition, as the closest, the pongids or great apes (some of whom like the chimp are good hunters and eat large amounts of meat- mostly monkeys) separated out ~6 million years ago. Of the large genera primates, many are heavy meat eaters, some are widely omnivorous, a few rather short lived monkeys are herbivorous, like the proboscids, and some- like the tree shrew are totally insectivorous..


The gorillas are completely vegetarian, up to 90% of the chimpanzee diet is fruit and pith. However, there seems to be an increase in hunting with chimpanzees during certain months of the year-at least with one observer

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache...cd=2&lr=lang_en
http://www.sciencenews.org/pages/sn_edpik/b_1.htm.

Again, I am not arguing your results, nor am I making a case for any type of diet. I am just trying to correct some errors I noted.

Last edited by Paleoanth : Fri, Mar-10-06 at 22:23.
Reply With Quote
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:26.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.